Monday, December 12, 2016

IMF's Lagarde says she's confident ahead of a major court hearing related to when she was French finance minister

IMF's Lagarde says she's confident ahead of a major court hearing related to when she was French finance minister

christine lagarde1Christine Lagarde. Reuters
PARIS (Reuters) - International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde said on Sunday she was confident that she had done nothing wrong ahead of a court hearing about payments to a businessman when she was French finance minister.
Lagarde is set to stand trial on Monday over her role in a 400 million euro ($428 million) payout to Bernard Tapie in 2008 when she was finance minister in President Nicolas Sarkozy's government.
"Negligence is a non-intentional offense. I think we are all a bit negligent sometimes in our life. I have done my job as well as I could, within the limits of what I knew," she said on France 2 television.
Lagarde said she was confident and determined, and denied that she have favored Tapie or that she had acted on Sarkozy's orders.
Read the original article on Reuters. Copyright 2016. Follow Reuters on Twitter.

Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and other investors are launching a $1 billion green energy fund

Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and other investors are launching a $1 billion green energy fund

bill gatesBill Gates. Chip Somodevilla / Getty
Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and a consortium of high-profile investors are backing a new $1 billion (£790 million) venture fund that will invest in clean energy technology.
It's called Breakthrough Energy Ventures (BEV), and it has a broad focus. "Anything that leads to cheap, clean, reliable energy we’re open-minded to," Gates told Quartz
Alongside the Microsoft-cofounder-turned-philanthropist and the Amazon CEO, there is an array of top investors and industry leaders backing it — including Virgin's Richard Branson, Bridgewater Associate's Ray Dalio, John Doerr from Kleiner Perkins, LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman, Vinod Khosla of Khosla Ventures, Alibaba exec chairman Jack Ma, Facebook cofounder-turned-investor Dustin Moskovitz, and Softbank CEO Masayoshi Son.
In short: There are some seriously big names behind it. Quartz suggests that, with the group's combined total wealth of $170 billion, it could be the "richest group of investors ever assembled."
It's dedicated to investing in green and clean energy technologies, to try and tackle the threat of climate change and move humanity onto renewable energy sources.
"The Breakthrough Energy Coalition is a partnership committed to broad investment in new energy technologies," BEV says on its website. "We are investing our own capital and are working with over 20 countries around the world who have committed to significantly increase their investments in the basic research that leads to breakthrough innovations."
It adds: "To provide reliable and affordable power without contributing to climate change we need to address emissions in five key areas: electricity, transportation, agriculture, manufacturing, and buildings."
Gates, since stepping down as Microsoft's CEO in 2000, has devoted ever more of his time to philanthropic efforts. With tens of billions of dollars at his disposal, the work of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation varies from working on sanitation solutions to trying to stamp out malaria.
Back in November 2015, Gates and other tech leaders including Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg launched the Breakthrough Energy Coalition, which brought together more than 25 investors, The Guardian reported at the time. The launch of BEV is the next step in taking action to try and tackle climate change.
"To provide everyone in the world with access to reliable, affordable power, food, goods, transportation, and services without contributing to greenhouse gas emissions will not be an easy job," the organisation says.
"Developing the tools we need will require broad investment across a landscape of innovation—and no investor or group of investors can do this alone. Breakthrough Energy is committed to encouraging a wide network of public and private capital to work together to solve the problem."
Disclosure: Jeff Bezos is an investor in Business Insider through his personal investment company Bezos Expeditions.

SCHWARZMAN: Donald Trump is going to change the 'architecture of the world'

SCHWARZMAN: Donald Trump is going to change the 'architecture of the world'

Stephen Schwarzman, Chairman, CEO and Co-Founder of Blackstone, speaks at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills, California, U.S., May 3, 2016. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson Blackstone CEO Stephen Schwarzman. Thomson Reuters
Blackstone CEO Steve Schwarzman is excited about President-elect Donald Trump's America.
The billionaire private equity executive, who was recently named chair of Trump's economic advisory forum, described the vast regulatory changes that could potentially come to Wall Street — and corporate America — under the new administration. He was speaking at a Goldman Sachs conference.
"If you look at the architecture of the world, it's going to change very substantially," Schwarzman said.
He described the different "piles" of regulatory changes to expect. The first, he said, are executive actions that can be reversed relatively quickly. The second are changes that will require hearings; those will take more like six or nine months. 
Then there are individuals heading regulatory agencies that will eventually turn over, which could take as long as a year and a quarter, Schwarzman said. Lastly, there are changes that can only be addressed through legislation, which are much less likely because they need to be passed in the Senate.
"But this is going to be very, very substantial," Schwarzman said.
In addition to regulatory changes, he said, we will see tax reform via reconciliation, which only requires a majority of Senate votes.
"It doesn't require any Democrats, assuming the Republicans vote as a block," he said. "Both Republicans and Democrats have wanted tax reform but they couldn't do it for ideological reasons, and now don't have to worry about those ideological reasons because you get enough votes, you can just change the law."
He said the country needs to see both corporate and individual tax reform, as a large portion of US companies are registered as limited partnerships and other non-corporate entities.
"We also have the ability, under reconciliation, to bring back all this trapped cash abroad," Schwarzman said, adding that we could see a 10% tax rate on cash held abroad. "So that will probably come back into the US economy."
Schwarzman said there is no element of the current regulatory structure that won't undergo a "significant" change, and that the revamp will drive GDP, make the US a friendlier place for foreign capital, and help accelerate growth.
"I anticipate with a pretty high level of confidence that this stuff is going to happen," he said. "And this is as big a change happening all at once — you know, I've been in finance for 45 years — this'll be the biggest."

The bond market rout is continuing in Asia

The bond market rout is continuing in Asia

Michael Smith / Newsmakers
The bond market sell-off which began back in July and intensified since the US presidential election continues in Asia today with US 10-year treasuries rising to 2.49% – their highest level since June 2016.
That selling has translated to higher rates and falling prices across developed market bond curves even though the outlook for interest rates across most of the developed world – with the exception of the US – is for central bank rates to remain unchanged for an extended period.
Earlier today the Australian 10-year bond traded up to a high of 2.91 – its equal highest rate for 2016.
US, Australian, UK, and German 10-year rates daily (Source: Reuters Eikon)
Only the Fed is expected to raise rates any time soon. But bond curves the world over are steepening as traders and investors bet that there will be some leakage into the global economy from Trumponomics’ reflationary impact on the United States.
For example, the Australian bond curve at 95.8 points is the steepest it’s been between the 2- and 10-year government bond since the middle of 2015. It’s moved in line with, and in an accelerated way outperformed, the steepening in the US bond curve.
Australian and US 2-10 bond spread daily (source: Reuters Eikon)
Whether the bond market rout continues is an open question.
Last Thursday, Goldman Sachs’ legendary strategist Abby Joseph-Cohen told Tom Keene on Bloomberg that Goldman thought rates were on their way to the 2.8% region. That’s another 30 basis points of selling to go.
Over the weekend, the Bank of International Settlements – often thought of as the central bank’s central bank – didn’t try to pin the tail on an outright level for rates but simply asked whether the moves post-election would stick.
Claudio Borio, head of the Monetary and Economic Department at the BIS, in comments accompanying the release of the latest quarterly review, asked himself the question of whether we are “facing a market overreaction or a paradigm shift?”
It’s too early to tell, he concluded, but the behavioural economics and finance guy in me suggests he answered his own question when he said:
“What is surprising is that it took just one political event to seemingly dispel, in one fell swoop, the market’s belief in a future of persistently ultra-low interest rates, secularly low growth and disinflationary pressures. These events could finally represent the long-awaited beginning of a welcome normalisation process from the extraordinary post-crisis conditions. But the jury is still out, and caution is in order. And make no mistake: bond yields are still unusually low from a long-term perspective. “
Bonds bottomed 3-4 months before the US election. Janet Yellen and her colleagues were actively floating the idea of letting the economy run hot before increasing interest rates aggressively.
So the market was primed for the message that Trumponomics delivers on the potential lift in inflation and nominal growth.
As the BIS’ Borio suggests, under that environment, rates are unusually low and this bond market rout could have legs.

Trump reportedly settles on Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson as secretary of state

Trump reportedly settles on Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson as secretary of state

tillerson putinRussian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin (R) speaks with Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson at a signing ceremony in the Black Sea resort of Sochi August 30, 2011. REUTERS/Alexsey Druginyn/RIA Novosti/Pool
President-elect Donald Trump has reportedly selected Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson to be his administration's secretary of state, sources told NBC's Andrea Mitchell on Saturday.
Mitchell said that Tillerson will be officially nominated sometime next week "barring some unforeseen change of mind by the president-elect." 
Mitchell also reported that Tillerson — an unusual pick with no political experience — will likely be paired with former UN Ambassador John Bolton, who would serve as deputy secretary.
Tillerson and Trump met on Saturday morning, a transition official told Reuters. 
Tillerson had become the leading candidate for the post in recent days, amid high drama and constant speculation over the position for weeks. The Wall Street Journal reported that Tillerson's emergence as a candidate for the nation's top diplomatic post came as a surprise to both him and senior Exxon officials.
Tillerson's nomination may also open up questions about potential conflicts of interest because of Exxon's large portfolio around the globe. Few US citizens are closer to Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, beyond Henry Kissinger, according to The Journal.
Putin and Tillerson cut a deal in 2011 giving Exxon access to oil resources in Russia's Arctic, though it was eventually blocked by the US sanctions after Russia invaded the Crimean peninsula. Tillerson was awarded the country's Order of Friendship.
Tillerson's close ties to Putin will likely come intense scrutiny during his confirmation process if he is nominated. The news of his potential appointment comes a day after the reports emerged that the CIA has concluded Russian hackers deliberately interfered with the election to try to help Trump to victory.
Trump has also considered for the post 2012 Republican nominee Mitt Romney, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair Bob Corker, Gen. David Petraeus, and Bolton, among others. Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani was an early frontrunner for the position but withdrew his name from consideration.
A spokeswoman for Trump's transition team did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Oil is going crazy after the first deal in 15 years is sealed between Russia and Saudi Arabia to cut production

Oil is going crazy after the first deal in 15 years is sealed between Russia and Saudi Arabia to cut production

fracking crude oilAn oil pumpjack working at dawn in the Permian Basin oil field in the oil town of Andrews, Texas.Spencer Platt/Getty
The price of oil has surged by more than $2 a barrel, or 5%, after surprise cuts from Saudi Arabia and other major oil-producing countries.
Khalid al-Falih, the Saudi oil minister, announced a deal late on Saturday between OPEC and non-OPEC countries to cut oil production and boost prices.
At the core of the deal was an agreement between Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest oil producer and a core member of the OPEC group, and Russia, which led a consortium of other non-OPEC countries, to cut production by more than 500,000 barrels a day.
Saudi Arabia also surprised the market with deeper-than-expected cuts in its domestic production, sending oil past $52 a barrel as the market opened.
Here is the chart:
crude1Investing
Al-Falih tweeted that the deal was "historic":



أثمر اجتماع  اليوم في "فيينا" مع المنتجين من خارج المنظمة عن اتفاق تاريخي سيوسع دائرة التعاون لتوازن الأسواق
But while the agreement helped push prices back up above $50, the countries will have to follow their words with actions to keep it there.
"I'm glad that we've come through this long way and that we've eventually finished this," Alexander Novak, the Russian energy minister, said, according to a Bloomberg News report. "But this is not the end of this route, we have a big joint work to do to carry out the agreement."
Saudi Arabia, which relies on oil for its state revenue, curbed its production by more than expected to protect the market from the risk that other countries fail to follow through, according to analysts at Goldman Sachs.
Here is Goldman Sachs:
"Importantly in our view, the agreement was followed by comments by Saudi's energy minister that the kingdom is ready to cut production below the 10.06 mb/d target established on November 30. This comment comforts us in our view that Saudi Arabia has a strong economic incentive to cut production to achieve a normalization of inventories at this stage of the oil market rebalancing, even if it requires a larger unilateral cut."

China isn't the only reason Americans are losing manufacturing jobs

China isn't the only reason Americans are losing manufacturing jobs

 More Charts
  •  
  •  
  •  
Protectionism has grown quite popular as American workers continue to worry about losing jobs to other countries.
And politicians zeroed in on these anxieties as they vied for the top job in the White House during the 2016 campaign. President-elect Donald Trump in particular made the debate over free trade one of the central topics of his campaign after criticizing China, Mexico, and Japan.
Although there is empirical evidence suggesting that increased trade with China actually did cause some big problems for American workers, it's not the only factor that has affected the manufacturing sector. Automation has also been a contributor.
In a recent note to clients, Capital Economics' Andrew Hunter included a chart comparing manufacturing output (purple line) to manufacturing employment (black line).
manufacturing COTDCapital Economics
Manufacturing employment has been trickling downwards since the mid-1980s, and then started dropping at a faster rate around 2001 (which coincides with China entering the World Trade Organization). Meanwhile, manufacturing output has been increasing since the mid-1980s and is now near its pre-crisis high.
In other words, firms have overall been able to increase output with less workers over the years, which is likely at least partially due to automation.
"It’s true that many of the manufacturing sectors that account for the bulk of the jobs lost over the past 15 years are also the ones subjected to the most competition from Chinese exports. But US manufacturing has also experienced high productivity growth, with the computers and electronics industry, which has lost the most jobs, seeing the fastest productivity growth of all," wrote Hunter. 
And here's what that could mean going forward, again from Hunter:
"The upshot is that reversing the five million manufacturing jobs lost since 2001 will be difficult. For a start, if Trump were to pursue protectionist measures targeting China specifically, US firms would simply switch to other low-cost suppliers elsewhere. The only way to eliminate the goods trade deficit would probably involve an all-out global trade war. In any case, many of the manufacturing jobs have instead been lost because of faster productivity growth, which can’t be reversed. Accordingly, even if Trump were to carry through with his threats of using protectionist policies to try and close the trade deficit, a return of manufacturing employment to 2001 levels is unlikely. Furthermore, the damage caused by the kind of blanket tariff on US firms offshoring production, which Trump recently proposed on Twitter, would probably far outweigh any boost to domestic manufacturing employment."

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600