Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Moving HQ to Singapore makes sense for StanChart: Aberdeen

Moving HQ to Singapore makes sense for StanChart: Aberdeen

[SINGAPORE] Standard Chartered has a strong business case to move its headquarters from London to Singapore and save millions in taxes as, unlike HSBC , it doesn't have a banking network in the UK, Aberdeen Asset Management said. "It's a far clearer business decision for Standard Chartered as really a far purer emerging market bank with no banking network in the UK, no banking network in Europe," Hugh Young, managing director of Aberdeen Asia Management Asia, told Reuters in an interview on Tuesday.
A move to Singapore is logical for StanChart as its main franchise is in the city-state, besides Hong Kong and Africa, he said.
Aberdeen is the second biggest shareholder in Standard Chartered, with an aggregate 9.4 per cent stake. Singapore state investor Temasek Holdings is the biggest shareholder in the British bank with a 17.7 per cent stake.
HSBC and StanChart, which make most of their profits in Asia, face a combined US$2 billion bill this year under the annual UK bank tax, up from US$1.5 billion last year and almost double what they paid in 2013.
Several investors have said they want the two banks to do a thorough analysis on whether it makes sense to move after Britain raised the bank tax by a third last month.
A big jump in the tax on UK banks has made staying in Britain increasingly painful for both HSBC and StanChart. "From a purely economic point of view, given it is taxed hundreds of millions for being in London and that's not really where its business is. Yes, in a sense it should move overnight," Young said, referring to StanChart.
He, however, noted the difficulties of such a move. "It's not easy to move the domicile of a bank and re-do everything." On Monday, the chairman of HSBC, Europe's biggest bank, said that HSBC will look at whether to move its headquarters from London once the regulatory environment becomes clearer.
Aberdeen remains bullish on StanChart and is comfortable holding onto its stake. "I think it's fundamentally not a bad bank. Yes, it made some mistakes that banks make, but not fatal mistakes - relatively straight forward," Young said.
On the positive side, StanChart had a strong franchise in some long-term growth markets of the world at a very reasonable value, he said.
REUTERS

No comments:

Post a Comment

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600