Monday, November 20, 2017

A key recession indicator is getting closer to the danger zone — and the Fed can't ignore it

A key recession indicator is getting closer to the danger zone — and the Fed can't ignore it

Federal Reserve Chairman Janet Yellen speaks during a news conference after a two-day Federal Open Markets Committee (FOMC) policy meeting in Washington, U.S., September 20, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts  Federal Reserve Board Chair Janet Yellen. Thomson Reuters
  • A shift in the bond market is giving investors and Federal Reserve officials pause about the economic outlook.
  • The concern stems from earlier periods when long-term interest rates slip toward or even below their short-term counterparts, often signaling recessions.
  • Philadelphia Fed President Patrick Harker says the central bank must avoid inverting the yield curve, or allowing 10-year Treasury yields to slip beneath two-year rates.


The Federal Reserve's plan to keep raising interest rates could soon run into a wall of its own making: low long-term borrowing costs that signal expectations for weak economic growth and anemic investment returns for the foreseeable future.
Why is the Fed to blame? It isn't the only culprit, but the subdued economic recovery from the Great Recession and continued expectations for weakness stem in part from an insufficient, halting policy reaction to the deepest downturn in generations — both from monetary and, importantly, fiscal policy.
In the past, including before the Great Recession, an inverted yield curve — where long-term interest rates fall below their short-term counterparts — has been a reliable predictor of recessions. The bond market is not there yet, but a sharp recent flattening of the yield curve has many in the markets watchful and concerned.
The US yield curve is now at its flattest in about 10 years — in other words, since around the time a major credit crunch of was gaining steam. The gap between two-year-note yields and their 10-year counterparts has shrunk to just 0.63 percentage points, the narrowest since November 2007.
yield curveAndy Kiersz/Business Insider
In fact, Shyam Rajan, Carol Zhang, and Olivia Lima, rate strategists at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, think low long-term bond yields could prevent the central bank from hiking interest rates further, as it plans to do.
"We believe a pre-condition for the Fed to continue its hiking cycle in 2018 should be higher intermediate and long-term rates," they wrote in a research note to clients. "Without the latter, we would have doubts on the former."
After leaving the official federal funds rate at effectively zero for seven years, the Fed has raised it four times since December 2015, to a range of 1% to 1.25%. It has also begun shrinking a $4.5 trillion balance sheet, largely accumulated as part of extraordinary measures taken during and after the financial crisis.
Philadelphia Fed President Patrick Harker appeared to corroborate the Bank of America analysts' assumption in an interview with Bloomberg TV earlier this week: He said he was "concerned" about the flattening of the yield curve.
"That's why the pace of removal of accommodation has to be gradual," he said. "My goal is to remove accommodation in a way that we do not run the risk of inverting the yield curve."

Friday, November 17, 2017

TAX REFORM PASSES THE HOUSE

TAX REFORM PASSES THE HOUSE

paul ryan tax cut boxesHouse Speaker Paul Ryan. J. Scott Applewhite/AP Images
  • The House passed its version of the Republican Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on Thursday.
  • The bill passed despite objections from some Republican members.
  • Passage of the bill is another step toward the Republican overhaul of the tax code, but there is still work to be done.


House Republicans took a huge step forward on their plan to overhaul the federal tax code Thursday with the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
The bill passed mostly along party lines, 227 to 205, with two Democrats not voting and 13 Republicans voting against it. The White House released a statement after the vote praising the result.
"President Donald J. Trump applauds the House of Representatives for passing the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act — a big step toward fulfilling our promise to deliver historic tax cuts for the American people by the end of the year," the statement said.
Before the vote, House Speaker Paul Ryan and Republican leadership faced questions about whether they could garner enough votes from party members in states where people were expected to lose a key deduction under the plan. Republican votes against the bill came almost exclusively from members in those states: New York, California, and New Jersey.
Residents of these states are heavy users of the state and local tax deduction, which allows people to subtract state and local taxes from their federal tax bill.
The first version of the bill eliminated the deduction, but leaders were able to come up with a compromise. In the version passed by the House, the SALT deduction would be repealed for income and sales taxes, but most people would still be able to deduct up to $10,000 in property taxes.
For many members in states with high taxes, the compromise was not enough. Rep. Dan Donovan of New York, a Republican who voted "no" on the bill, said he would support the final bill "if the SALT deduction gets put back in."
Donovan also said that discussions between skeptical members and leadership on the SALT deduction were ongoing and that the provision could change when the bill comes back to the House after any revisions in the Senate.
"I think that what we're going to vote on today is not going to be the final bill that's going to go to the president's desk," Donovan told Business Insider before the vote. "I think that there's still going to be negotiations. I think there might be people today voting 'yes' that would like to see the SALT deduction retained and hoping that's done when they go to conference with the Senate."
Other members from the high-tax states still decided to support the bill given the compromise and the bill's broader proposals. Republican Rep. Tom MacArthur of New Jersey, who was initially skeptical of the bill, said proposed changes to things like the standard deduction were enough to win him over despite the significant changes to the SALT deduction.
"This is not only good for the families and businesses in my state, but it's also good for the country, and I think it is important to support it for that reason," MacArthur told Business Insider on Thursday.
The massive bill is moving through Congress at breakneck speed, but the House bill's passage is just another in a series of steps for it.
The House bill was first introduced just two weeks ago, and it cleared the House Ways and Means Committee last week. The Senate is marking up its version of the bill in the Finance Committee, and there already appear to be issues in that chamber.
If the Senate is able to pass its version of the bill, House and Senate members will have to come together on a conference committee to agree on a compromise bill. That bill would then need to be approved by both chambers before heading to Trump's desk.

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600