Thursday, February 16, 2017

Ben Bernanke: An Insider’s Take on the Economy

Ben Bernanke: An Insider’s Take on the Economy

Categories: EconomicsFuture StatesHistory & GeopoliticsPortfolio Management
Ben Bernanke: An Insider's Take on the Economy
It was just shy of two weeks since President Donald Trump’s inauguration when former US Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke took to the podium at the CFA Society Boston’s 31st Annual Market Dinner.
During that time, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) had breached the historic 20,000 mark for the first time, one prominent newspaper had characterized some of the new president’s actions as “the most aggressive campaign against government regulation in a generation,” and the US dollar had tumbled after Trump’s top trade adviser, Peter Navarro, said Germany was leveraging a “grossly undervalued” euro to gain an edge on the United States.
And so it was with great anticipation that I sat down to hear Bernanke address nearly 1,000 CFA charterholders. Having served as chairman of the Fed from 2006 to 2014 and overseen its response to the global financial crisis, Bernanke has deep insight into the global financial system.
His presentation covered a broad range of topics, from the current state of macroeconomics, regulation, and policy, to financial stability and the geopolitical climate at large. Here are a few key takeaways from his speech and the subsequent question-and-answer session:
1. The US economy is “The Little Engine That Could.”
Despite aftershocks that continue to reverberate from the 2008 crisis, the United States has enjoyed steady growth and job creation, Bernanke said. In fact, more than 15 million jobs have been created since 2010. In addition, the inflation rate is currently stable at under 2%. All signs indicate that the economy has “room to run,” he said.
2. President Trump identified fundamental problems in the US economy.
Bernanke noted that President Trump’s surprising election can be credited, in part, to his ability to tap into public dissatisfaction with the US economy. Trump identified the “fundamental problems that have been festering,” Bernanke said.
What precisely are these problems? Globalization-related disruptions and low economic productivity have left many with a pervasive sense that they have been left behind in the aftermath of the financial crisis, according to Bernanke.
If Trump’s “upset election” provides the necessary incentive for policy makers to address these issues, it should count as a positive, Bernanke said.
3. Trump’s proposals may or may not help those who feel left behind.
Bernanke identified a few potential barriers that could keep the new administration from achieving its goals:
  • Political divisions in the US Congress may make it difficult to finance large infrastructure projects.
  • Trump’s comments and actions could stifle trade and health care spending.
  • Rising interest rates and the strong US dollar may inhibit a broad economic expansion.
With these factors in mind, Bernanke cautioned the crowd to “Wait and see what happens before we anticipate a boom in the economy.”
4. There’s no reason to think there is an increased risk of a recession.
Despite the uncertainty surrounding the new administration, Bernanke said, the potential for a recession has not changed. Understanding the financial system is not the same as forecasting what may come, he explained. To use an analogy, doctors can understand the human body and treat illnesses, but they can’t predict when someone will go into cardiac arrest. The same goes for the economy.
In the weeks since Bernanke’s talk, the Trump administration has announced the overhaul of many financial regulations put in place during his tenure at the Fed, including steps to repeal Dodd-Frank and the Department of Labor (DOL) Fiduciary Rule.
That said, these key regulations still remain and are important to keep in mind as we look to put the client’s interest first. Regardless of the regulatory regime, all advisers must act with the highest standard of care.
Regulations may change, but standards don’t.
If you liked this post, don’t forget to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.

All posts are the opinion of the author. As such, they should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute or the author’s employer.
Image courtesy of CFA Society Boston

Goldman Sachs climbs to a record high

Goldman Sachs climbs to a record high

Shares of Goldman Sachs ticked to an all-time high on Wednesday, gaining 0.5% to $250.67 per share. The session not only marked Goldman's second straight close in record territory but saw shares eclipse the October 2007 all-time high of $250.70 per share. Intraday Goldman shares hit a high of $251.95. 
Goldman, and other US banks, have been the beneficiary of President Donald Trump's plans to roll back Wall Street regulation. During his first month in office, Trump signed an executive order to revise and update the Dodd-Frank regulation that oversees the country's financial institutions. 
Goldman's stock has rallied almost 38% since Election Day and has been a big reason as to why the Dow Jones Industrial average recently crossed the 20,000 mark for its first time ever.
GS Goldman Sachs Gr Rg
 249.44 -1.10 (-0.40 %)
DisclaimerGet real-time GS charts here »


Visit Markets Insider for constantly updated market quotes for individual stocks, ETFs, indices, commodities and currencies traded around the world. Go Now!

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

One of the US's largest health-insurance companies is dumping Obamacare; Trump says law 'continues to fail'

One of the US's largest health-insurance companies is dumping Obamacare; Trump says law 'continues to fail'

Obama sad frownPresident Barack Obama.AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster
HUM Humana Rg
 210.78 4.87 (+2.40 %)
DisclaimerGet real-time HUM charts here »
Humana is pulling out of the Affordable Care Act market.
The company, one of the five large publicly traded health insurers, said in a press release Tuesday that it would pull all its business from the individual marketplaces starting January 1, 2018.
The announcement comes the same day that Humana and rival Aetna terminated their merger agreement.
Humana said it was hoping that the individual marketplaces set up by the law known as Obamacare would stabilize.
But the company said that in reviewing data from 2017 enrollment on the exchanges, it saw "further signs of an unbalanced risk pool."
From Humana's statement (emphasis added):
"All of these actions were taken with the expectation that the company’s Individual Commercial business would stabilize to the point where the company could continue to participate in the program. However, based on its initial analysis of data associated with the company’s healthcare exchange membership following the 2017 open enrollment period, Humana is seeing further signs of an unbalanced risk pool. Therefore, the company has decided that it cannot continue to offer this coverage for 2018. Through the remainder of 2017, Humana remains committed to serving its current members across 11 states where it offers Individual Commercial products."
President Donald Trump said Humana's pull-out was evidence of the law continuing to "fail."
"Obamacare continues to fail," Trump tweeted. "Humana to pull out in 2018. Will repeal, replace & save healthcare for ALL Americans."
In previous years, large insurers have suffered losses on the Obamacare exchanges because of a risk pool that has been sicker and older, and thus more expensive to cover than expected.
Obama officials hoped that a larger number of young people would sign up through the exchanges during the open-enrollment period that ran from November 1, 2016, to January 31, 2017, and would help balance the costs. Instead, enrollment plummeted in the two weeks after Trump took office, and sign-ups came in lower than the year before.
That was critical, since more young people enroll in the last two weeks of the open-enrollment period.
Health-policy experts had theorized that the uncertainty of the GOP plan to replace the law, combined with the Trump administration's decision to not promote enrollment efforts in the critical weeks, could do serious damage to the exchanges, cause insurers to reconsider their involvement in the exchanges as Humana did on Tuesday, and lead to the "death spiral" Republicans has been claiming was happening for years.

Monday, February 13, 2017

As promised, Oracle just filed its appeal in its massive case against Google

As promised, Oracle just filed its appeal in its massive case against Google

Larry Ellison and Safra CatzOracle's Larry Ellison and Safra Catz AP
If you thought the loss Oracle suffered in May in its ongoing lawsuit against Google over Android was the end, think again.
As promised, Oracle is appealing the case, and filed its appeal today.
The two tech giants have been battling it out for years in two separate court cases over whether Google must pay Oracle billions of dollars for bits of code copied from Java (a programming language Oracle owns) and used in Android (the language Google controls).
At issue were bits of code called application programming interfaces (APIs), the technology that allows different computer programs to talk to each other.
While there's been back and forth over the years, with one side winning or losing various stages of the fight, the upshot is, Google has yet to be found liable for paying Oracle for Java, much less the massive, multi-billion dollar fine Oracle dreams of.

Chilling effect

In May, the two companies were in court arguing over what amount, if anything, Google owes after an earlier trial found that Google did in fact copy some of the Java code.
Google argued that the copying fell within the "fair use" provision of copyright law, meaning Google was free to use it. A jury of 10 unanimously agreed with Google. Oracle vowed to appeal and here we are.
In the appeal filing, seen by Business Insider, Oracle argues that the jury in May didn't get to hear all of the facts it wanted to share. Those facts included all the ways it believes Android harms Java, including how Android might one day usurp Java's role in its primary domain, as a language used to create apps and Web apps for PCs. 
Oracle's lawyers argue in the appeal filing:
“Google started trial knowing a fact it kept secret from everyone else: It was days away from announcing that 'the full functionality of Android would soon be working on desktops and laptops, not just on smartphones and tablets.'”  
Many in the tech industry have been watching this case closely. Critics argue that a big fine for Oracle could have a chilling effect on some of the ways that software developers freely use and share code today.
Google is not commenting on the appeal, although it did send Business Insider its original statement when it won the jury case in May.
"[The] verdict that Android makes fair use of Java APIs represents a win for the Android ecosystem, for the Java programming community, and for software developers who rely on open and free programming languages to build innovative consumer products."
More: Oracle Google Java Android 

IMF head: Trump is good for US economy for now, but trouble looms

IMF head: Trump is good for US economy for now, but trouble looms

donald trumpGetty Images/Pool
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — The head of the International Monetary Fund says U.S. President Donald Trump taking office is likely good for the U.S. economy in the short term, though rising American interest rates and a strengthening dollar will challenge global trade.
Christine Lagarde said Trump's plans for additional investment in U.S. infrastructure and his likely tax reforms will boost the American economy.
She says: "We have reasons to be optimistic about growth in the United States."
However, Lagarde acknowledged that Trump's policies likely will lead to "tightening that is going to be difficult on the global economy."
She also defended globalization and international trade at a time of growing protectionism in the U.S. and elsewhere in the world.
Lagarde spoke Sunday in Dubai at the annual World Government Summit.

Friday, February 10, 2017

From Obama to Trump (Video)


From Obama to Trump

2017 , HOME   

From Obama to Trump
How do we assess the legacy of President Barack Obama, especially in the wake of an election that is determined to undo many of his accomplishments? Al Jazeera attempts to form a clear-eyed perspective on this confusing period in American politics with their documentary From Obama to Trump.
When he was first elected in 2008, President Obama stood as a transformative figure of hope and change for people throughout the civilized world. The film acknowledges a myriad of positive accomplishments during his two terms in office, but it is also extremely frank in what it views as his failures. These include mounting tensions in Syria, the emergence of ISIS, trembling relations with Russia, and an economy that remains far too sluggish for many Americans.
The filmmakers view race as a particularly fascinating factor of the Obama legacy. Much of the positivity and goodwill that surrounded his election stemmed from the notion of a post-racial society. Alas, this hope might have just been an illusion as deep racial divisions continued to plague America's cities during his presidency. One brief segment of the film explores the inner city discord which led to the formation of the Black Lives Matter movement.
Obama's foreign and domestic policies are also placed under a microscope throughout the course of the film. The film smartly provides the pros and cons of each issue, including the enactment of the Affordable Care act, the Iran nuclear deal, historic climate change agreements, and escalating skirmishes in the Middle East.
From Obama to Trump summarizes the former president's legacy as a mixed bag of merits and shortcomings. Regardless of each viewer's individual take on Obama's overall job performance, one thing is for certain. President Trump was elected in large part on the promise that he would reverse many of his key actions.
So, what does it all mean? Only time will tell. After all, the true meaning of history can only reveal itself in hindsight, and the concluding chapters on the Obama presidency have not yet been determined. For this reason, the film focuses on providing thoughtful questions more than concrete conclusions.

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600