Friday, April 8, 2016

YELLEN: 'I certainly wouldn't describe this as a bubble economy'

YELLEN: 'I certainly wouldn't describe this as a bubble economy'

Janet Yellen Steve SchwartmanREUTERS/Lucas JacksonUS Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen speaking to the Economic Club of New York on March 29.
NEW YORK — The US economy is on a solid course with some hints of inflation, so the Federal Reserve is on track for further interest-rate hikes, Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen said Thursday in a defense of her decision to tighten policy late last year.
In a rare spectacle, Yellen spoke on a New York panel alongside her three predecessors who ran the world's most powerful central bank. She said that, seven years after the brutal financial crisis, the US labor market was now "close" to full strength, again arguing that inflation would not be held down much longer by the strong dollar and low oil prices.
"The US economy has continued to progress in a satisfactory way. We continue to see good job performance, some evidence of inflation moving up, so that was our expectation when we raised rates in December," she said at the International House, a New York nonprofit residence for students.
"So yes, there is accommodation in the monetary policy that we have. But we think the gradual path of rate increases will be appropriate," Yellen added. "We remain on a reasonable path and I don't think December was a mistake."
The Fed raised its benchmark policy rate in December, the first increase in nearly a decade, to 0.25% to 0.5%.
Ben Bernanke and Paul Volcker joined the current Fed chair at the conference, and Alan Greenspan appeared via teleconference screens next to the stage. The four of them ran the Fed for a third of its 102-year history. This included Volcker's taming of the 1970s runaway inflation and Greenspan's 18-year run of relative economic stability and financial deregulation that ultimately led to the 2007-2009 Great Recession.
In a casual moderated discussion, they expressed a remarkable amount of agreement over one another's varied handling of the economy. They also agreed that China's growing prominence posed more opportunity than threat and that fiscal policymakers should step up more to support the Fed's economic stimulus.
A hot topic for the panelists was the US election campaign, in which Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump has lambasted the central bank for helping to stoke asset bubbles.
"I certainly wouldn't describe this as a bubble economy," Yellen said, noting a "healing" labor market in which unemployment is 5%, or about where the Fed wants it.
While Volcker acknowledged that he saw some "overextended" parts of the financial system, he agreed with Yellen, saying he did not believe the US was in an economic bubble.
Asked about the monetary policy adage in which the Fed takes away the punch bowl just as the party gets going — and whether any of his successors added too much vodka — Volcker, who ran the Fed from 1979 to 1987, said: "My successors were great, all."
(Reporting by Jonathan Spicer in New York; Additional reporting by Jason Lange in Washington; Editing by Diane Craft)
Read the original article on Reuters. Copyright 2016. Follow Reuters on Twitter.

Thursday, April 7, 2016

Valeant's getting a little mercy

Valeant's getting a little mercy

Michael Pearson ValeantREUTERS/Christinne MuschiJ. Michael Pearson, chairman of the board and CEO of Valeant Pharmaceuticals.
What a difference a day — or two — makes.
Valeant has been talking to its lenders to try and amend the terms of some loans it has taken out.
The company had failed to file its 10-K by March 15, and a failure to file it before April 29 would have triggered a technical default on those loans.
On Monday, Valeant Pharmaceuticals' creditors did not seem open to showing the company mercy by allowing Valeant to amend the terms of its debt.
Now, according to The Wall Street Journal, it looks like they will.
According to the WSJ:
Valeant agreed to pay a fee of $50,000 per $10 million of loans to lenders for the amendment and to boost interest rates on the debt by 1 percentage point, though the rate could decline if Valeant achieves certain financial metrics, the person said.
The company needed more than half of the creditors of its $11 billion in secured loans to agree.
Valeant's share price was up 18% during regular trading on Wednesday, and jumped another 4% in after-hours trading after the WSJ reported the loan agreement.
This all started when Valeant announced that it would delay the findings of its annual report because of a discrepancy found by its internal ad-hoc committee.
The committee was created to find any issues surrounding Valeant's involvement with a once secret distributor called Philidor. The committee found a $58 million error — a blip, really, for a company Valeant's size — and then concluded its investigation into Philidor on Tuesday.
Philidor's existence was disclosed in October, when scrutiny over Valeant's pricing practices, combined with accusations of malfeasance from a short seller, forced the company to acknowledge Philidor.
It looks like everyone wants to put that behind them, though. We'll see how that works.

Jamie Dimon wrote an op-ed in defense of big banks

Jamie Dimon wrote an op-ed in defense of big banks

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon has thoughts on why big banks are important to America.
Dimon, whose firm is the largest US bank by assets, wrote an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal about the benefits of large financial institutions like his, and the services they provide to consumers and smaller banks alike.
He framed the conversation around the relationship between large and small institutions, and led with an anecdote about some negative comments about big banks that the CEO of a regional bank recently made.
"I did some digging and found that our firms have a relationship that goes back many years and spans a broad range of essential services," Dimon wrote.
But Wall Street CEOs like Dimon are busy people, and they don't often take the time to personally write op-eds.
So it's unlikely that this personal tiff with another CEO is really what motivated the billionaire chief executive to take up the pen.
What's more likely is that this is about something much bigger.

Breaking up the banks

Since the heyday of the financial crisis, politicians and activists have been calling for the end of "Too Big to Fail" banks. But this being an election year, the volume of that conversation has ticked up a notch.
On Tuesday, the Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders said in a Daily News interview that JPMorgan "and virtually every other major bank in this country" are destroying the fabric of the US.
Last month the financial policy advocate Bartlett Naylor proposed breaking up both JPMorgan and Citigroup. His proposal is likely to end up in both banks' annual proxy filings.
Bernie SandersREUTERS/Jim YoungDemocratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders.
And then there's the Minneapolis Fed President and former Goldman Sachs executive Neel Kashkari.
In his first speech as a Fed official, Kashkari, who led President Obama's Troubled Asset Relief Program in the wake of the financial crisis, came out swinging with a call to break up big banks.
He advocated for "Turning large banks into public utilities by forcing them to hold so much capital that they virtually can't fail (with regulation akin to that of a nuclear power plant)."
In that light, it's maybe not so surprising that Dimon would choose this moment to publicly defend his firm.
The fact that he framed it around some comments made by an unnamed regional bank chief probably means that Dimon, who is a Democrat, was simply looking for a way to do it without appearing overtly political.

JAMIE DIMON: The US has 'serious issues that we need to address'

JAMIE DIMON: The US has 'serious issues that we need to address'

Jamie Dimon is worried about the future of the US.
In the company's annual letter, the JPMorgan CEO expressed concern over "long-term issues" facing the country and said that they could cause a crisis in the future.
"We have spoken many times about the extraordinarily positive and resilient American economy," wrote Dimon. "Today, it is growing stronger, and it is far better than you hear in the current political discourse. But we have serious issues that we need to address — even the United States does not have a divine right to success."
In a portion of the letter entitled "Good Public Policy Is Critically Important," Dimon highlighted major failures of public policy, including East Germany, Detroit, and Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.
"Yes, bad public policy, and I'm not looking at this in a partisan way, creates risk for the economies of the world and the living standards of the people on this planet — and, therefore, for the future of JPMorgan Chase — more so than credit or market risks," said Dimon.
After highlighting failures of public policy, Dimon then enumerated his concerns facing the US going forward.
"I won't go into a lot of detail but will list only some key concerns: the long-term fiscal and tax issues (driven mostly by healthcare and Social Security costs, as well as complex and poorly designed corporate and individual taxes), immigration, education (especially in inner city schools) and the need for good, longterm infrastructure plans," he wrote.
He then touched on the dangers of policy inaction by the US. Here's Dimon (emphasis added):
I do not believe that these issues will cause a crisis in the next five to 10 years, and, unfortunately, this may lull us into a false sense of security. But after 10 years, it will become clear that action will need to be taken. The problem is not that the US economy won't be able to take care of its citizens — it is that taking away benefits, creating intergenerational warfare and scapegoating will make for very difficult and bad politics. This is a tragedy that we can see coming. Early action would be relatively painless.
This is not totally the government's fault, said Dimon.
"All of us, as US citizens" bear responsibility and must pitch in to deal with the problems, he said.
Dimon said that he has had the opportunity to meet many world leaders in his job and has learned that "breeding mistrust and misunderstanding makes the political environment far worse."
He then lists some dos and don'ts for policymakers and people trying to address the issues he highlighted. A few of his tips included:
  • DON'T paint everything as black and white: "Most decisions are not binary, and there are usually better answers waiting to be found if you do the analysis and involve the right people."
  • DON'T attack an entire class or society of people: "This is always wrong and just another form of prejudice. One of the greatest men in America's history, President Abraham Lincoln, never drew straw men, never scapegoated and never denigrated any class of society — even though he probably had more reason to do so than many."
  • DO compromise: "Also, you can compromise without violating your principles, but it is nearly impossible to compromise when you turn principles into ideology."
  • DO reconsider existing policy and institutions: "Analyze what is working and what is not working, and then figure out — together — how we can make it better."

China may finally have stopped running out of money

China may finally have stopped running out of money

panda china strongREUTERS/Guang NiuYingying, a 17-year-old panda, born in a zoo in the southwestern province of Sichuan, lifts weights during a performance at the Chinese Acrobats Arts Festival in Beijing late October 20, 2001. Yingying is said to be the only member of the endangered species in the world able to dunk a basketball, go down a slide and drive a car.
Chinese foreign exchange reservesfinally stopped its slide in March, increasing by $10 billion to $3.212 trillion.
China's FX reserves peaked at about $4 trillion (£2.7 trillion) in the middle of 2014, but since then the country has burned through about $800 billion of its foreign cash.
Reserves had fallen for four consecutive months until March, and have dropped more than $600 billion in the last year alone, but that slide may be finally be over, even though the rise is pretty tiny, representing growth of just 0.3%.
The number was a beat on the expectations of economists, who had predicted a further fall — $6 billion — from February's number.
China's FX reserves have been the subject of lots of worry in recent years. In February, notoriously pessimistic economist Albert Edwards warned that the country is running out of money and will have to float the renminbi as a free currency.

Wednesday, April 6, 2016

Crude oil futures jump on hopes of an output freeze

Crude oil futures jump on hopes of an output freeze

oilAtef Hassan/Reuters
SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Crude oil futures jumped on Wednesday, lifted by growing expectations that exporters will agree to freeze their output amid global oversupply, although Iran's plans to boost production are seen as capping bigger price gains.
The Kuwaiti governor for the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), Nawal Al-Fuzaia, said on Tuesday that there were "positive indications an agreement will be reached" during a producer meeting scheduled for April 17 in Qatar.
Front month U.S. crude futures jumped a dollar, or 2.8 percent, to $36.89 per barrel at 0240 GMT. International Brent futures rose 1.8 percent at $38.55 a barrel.
"Oil gained some momentum. The comment by the Kuwait OPEC governor provided some support to prices," ANZ bank said, but warned that investors would likely remain cautious ahead of the April 17 meeting.
An initial output freeze agreed in February has helped oil prices rise to almost $38 a barrel from a 12-year low close to $27 plumbed earlier this year.
However, prices have fallen in recent days on doubts that a wider deal will be reached, largely because Iran has so far said it has no intention of slowing its production after crippling sanctions against it were lifted in January.
Iranian Oil Minister Bijan Namdar Zanganeh said the country's crude output would reach 4 million barrels per day (bpd) by March 2017, state television reported on Wednesday, with plans to export 2.25 million bpd of those supplies.
That would be up from a little over 1 million bpd under the sanctions and only slightly below pre-sanctions peaks of 2.5 million bpd.
oil worker barrelsReuters/Edgar SuA worker prepares to transport oil pipelines to be laid for the Pengerang Gas Pipeline Project at an area 40km (24 miles) away from the Pengerang Integrated Petroleum Complex in Pengerang, Johor, Malaysia.
With Iran's exports rising and other producers pledging to freeze production near record-high levels, an agreement would do little to address a global supply overhang that sees at least a million barrels of crude produced every day in excess of demand.
Dutch bank ING said that technical market indicators implied that oil prices had developed a bottom near recent lows but that the "short-term upside is limited".
In physical markets, sentiment was also less bullish, with Abu Dhabi cutting its March retroactive official selling price (OSP) crude premium over benchmark Dubai prices by 64 cents to $3.06 per barrel on ample supplies.
This followed top exporter Saudi Arabia cutting its May Arab Light crude OSP by 10 cents per barrel to a discount of $0.85 per barrel to the Dubai average.
(Editing by Richard Pullin and Himani Sarkrar)
Read the original article on Reuters. Copyright 2016. Follow Reuters on Twitter

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600