Monday, November 20, 2017

There are 3 things that could destroy one of the greatest stock rallies of all time

There are 3 things that could destroy one of the greatest stock rallies of all time

stock trader distraught angryAP Images / Richard Drew
  • The ongoing equity bull market is the third-longest in history, and it's showing few signs of slowing down.
  • Morgan Stanley thinks the current cycle could end sometime in 2018, and it lays out the three most likely negative catalysts.


As the equity bull market stretches well into its ninth year, it looks virtually unstoppable.
Formidable earnings growth, easy lending conditions and a gradually expanding economy have combined to cultivate an environment that's been ideal for stock appreciation.
Things have been going so well that investors almost seem bored with it. Volatility has remained locked near all-time lows for the better part of the year as complacency reigns supreme. Stocks have been the best game in town for close to a decade, and many investors are happy to sit tight and ride the wave higher.
Even those wringing their hands about the bull market have indirectly contributed to its continued excellence. The faint undercurrent of pessimism that's followed the rally at every turn has helped keep it from getting overheated. And on the occasions these skeptics have been able to spur selling, bulls have been waiting patiently for a chance to add to positions.
With all of that considered, Morgan Stanley has taken on the uneviable task of pinpointing what could ultimately bring about the end of the third-longest bull market in history. For context, the firm uses a proprietary US cycle indicator as a benchmark for when a downturn is imminent.
Based on their research, Morgan Stanley thinks the end of the bull market has a strong chance of happening sometime in 2018. The firm even has a nickname for the supposed catalysts that could push their indicator into downturn territory: the "three x's" — which include extreme leverage build-up, exuberant sentiment and excessive policy tightening.
Here's a deep dive into each:

Extreme leverage build-up

Morgan Stanley points out that previous comparable cycles have been derailed by steep increases in a measure of US debt to gross domestic product. While the firm doesn't see conditions as dire as they were around the Great Depression or the most recent financial crisis, it notes that deleveraging has stalled.
While this situation may be sustainable in the near-term, since interest rates are still locked near zero, that could soon change with the Federal Reserve signaling multiple rate hikes by the end of 2018. Morgan Stanley also notes that interest coverage — or the ability to service debt — has been declining for both US investment-grade and junk debt since 2015.
The chart below shows the ratio of debt/GDP, which has gone sideways in the past few years, implying that companies are no longer reducing debt burdens like they did when they were trying to dig out of the last market crash.
Screen Shot 2017 11 17 at 3.22.54 PMThe US hasn't been deleveraging over the past few years. Morgan Stanley

Exuberant sentiment

This next driver is one that was briefly addressed in the introduction: investor overconfidence. The thinking here is that when the market gets too cocky, it becomes blind to potential risks and therefore more susceptible to downward shocks. As Morgan Stanley puts it, when there's a "descent from thinking to feeling," that could spell trouble.
Morgan Stanley doesn't think the market is too exuberant quite yet. While one measure shows that expectations around the economy have gotten overly optimistic, it's still lower than where it was during the last financial crisis or the dotcom bubble.
Still, the chart below shows that US consumer confidence is the highest it's been since 2000, including a precipitous surge since the start of the bull market in 2009.
Screen Shot 2017 11 17 at 3.29.18 PMUS consumer confidence has soared during the bull market. Morgan Stanley

Excessive policy tightening

When Morgan Stanley says that cycle downturns follow prolonged periods of monetary policy tightening, it speaks from experience. After all, the Federal Reserve persistently hiked interest rates in the periods leading up to both the dotcom bubble and the financial crisis. And while the firm doesn't see excessive tightening yet, it warns that it could be right around the corner.
"We have a bit of a 'runway' to the cycle peak, but not much," a group of Morgan Stanley strategists wrote in a recent client note. "Over the next 12 months, our US economists expect further hikes in excess of core inflation, which would take us to ~190bp of cumulative hikes over 24 months, in line with the typical end-of-cycle policy environment."
Screen Shot 2017 11 17 at 4.04.57 PMCycle shifts have historically happened after periods of prolonged policy tightening. Morgan Stanley
But before you start to panic, Morgan Stanley would like to remind you that the stock market can continue to soar, even in the final year of an expansion cycle. They point out that in the past, the S&P 500 has rallied an average of 15% in the last 12 months of an equity bull market.
"The final year of the bull market can still be uncomfortably profitable," the Morgan Stanley strategists wrote. "Timing is everything."

A key recession indicator is getting closer to the danger zone — and the Fed can't ignore it

A key recession indicator is getting closer to the danger zone — and the Fed can't ignore it

Federal Reserve Chairman Janet Yellen speaks during a news conference after a two-day Federal Open Markets Committee (FOMC) policy meeting in Washington, U.S., September 20, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts  Federal Reserve Board Chair Janet Yellen. Thomson Reuters
  • A shift in the bond market is giving investors and Federal Reserve officials pause about the economic outlook.
  • The concern stems from earlier periods when long-term interest rates slip toward or even below their short-term counterparts, often signaling recessions.
  • Philadelphia Fed President Patrick Harker says the central bank must avoid inverting the yield curve, or allowing 10-year Treasury yields to slip beneath two-year rates.


The Federal Reserve's plan to keep raising interest rates could soon run into a wall of its own making: low long-term borrowing costs that signal expectations for weak economic growth and anemic investment returns for the foreseeable future.
Why is the Fed to blame? It isn't the only culprit, but the subdued economic recovery from the Great Recession and continued expectations for weakness stem in part from an insufficient, halting policy reaction to the deepest downturn in generations — both from monetary and, importantly, fiscal policy.
In the past, including before the Great Recession, an inverted yield curve — where long-term interest rates fall below their short-term counterparts — has been a reliable predictor of recessions. The bond market is not there yet, but a sharp recent flattening of the yield curve has many in the markets watchful and concerned.
The US yield curve is now at its flattest in about 10 years — in other words, since around the time a major credit crunch of was gaining steam. The gap between two-year-note yields and their 10-year counterparts has shrunk to just 0.63 percentage points, the narrowest since November 2007.
yield curveAndy Kiersz/Business Insider
In fact, Shyam Rajan, Carol Zhang, and Olivia Lima, rate strategists at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, think low long-term bond yields could prevent the central bank from hiking interest rates further, as it plans to do.
"We believe a pre-condition for the Fed to continue its hiking cycle in 2018 should be higher intermediate and long-term rates," they wrote in a research note to clients. "Without the latter, we would have doubts on the former."
After leaving the official federal funds rate at effectively zero for seven years, the Fed has raised it four times since December 2015, to a range of 1% to 1.25%. It has also begun shrinking a $4.5 trillion balance sheet, largely accumulated as part of extraordinary measures taken during and after the financial crisis.
Philadelphia Fed President Patrick Harker appeared to corroborate the Bank of America analysts' assumption in an interview with Bloomberg TV earlier this week: He said he was "concerned" about the flattening of the yield curve.
"That's why the pace of removal of accommodation has to be gradual," he said. "My goal is to remove accommodation in a way that we do not run the risk of inverting the yield curve."

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600