Wednesday, February 15, 2017

One of the US's largest health-insurance companies is dumping Obamacare; Trump says law 'continues to fail'

One of the US's largest health-insurance companies is dumping Obamacare; Trump says law 'continues to fail'

Obama sad frownPresident Barack Obama.AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster
HUM Humana Rg
 210.78 4.87 (+2.40 %)
DisclaimerGet real-time HUM charts here »
Humana is pulling out of the Affordable Care Act market.
The company, one of the five large publicly traded health insurers, said in a press release Tuesday that it would pull all its business from the individual marketplaces starting January 1, 2018.
The announcement comes the same day that Humana and rival Aetna terminated their merger agreement.
Humana said it was hoping that the individual marketplaces set up by the law known as Obamacare would stabilize.
But the company said that in reviewing data from 2017 enrollment on the exchanges, it saw "further signs of an unbalanced risk pool."
From Humana's statement (emphasis added):
"All of these actions were taken with the expectation that the company’s Individual Commercial business would stabilize to the point where the company could continue to participate in the program. However, based on its initial analysis of data associated with the company’s healthcare exchange membership following the 2017 open enrollment period, Humana is seeing further signs of an unbalanced risk pool. Therefore, the company has decided that it cannot continue to offer this coverage for 2018. Through the remainder of 2017, Humana remains committed to serving its current members across 11 states where it offers Individual Commercial products."
President Donald Trump said Humana's pull-out was evidence of the law continuing to "fail."
"Obamacare continues to fail," Trump tweeted. "Humana to pull out in 2018. Will repeal, replace & save healthcare for ALL Americans."
In previous years, large insurers have suffered losses on the Obamacare exchanges because of a risk pool that has been sicker and older, and thus more expensive to cover than expected.
Obama officials hoped that a larger number of young people would sign up through the exchanges during the open-enrollment period that ran from November 1, 2016, to January 31, 2017, and would help balance the costs. Instead, enrollment plummeted in the two weeks after Trump took office, and sign-ups came in lower than the year before.
That was critical, since more young people enroll in the last two weeks of the open-enrollment period.
Health-policy experts had theorized that the uncertainty of the GOP plan to replace the law, combined with the Trump administration's decision to not promote enrollment efforts in the critical weeks, could do serious damage to the exchanges, cause insurers to reconsider their involvement in the exchanges as Humana did on Tuesday, and lead to the "death spiral" Republicans has been claiming was happening for years.

Monday, February 13, 2017

As promised, Oracle just filed its appeal in its massive case against Google

As promised, Oracle just filed its appeal in its massive case against Google

Larry Ellison and Safra CatzOracle's Larry Ellison and Safra Catz AP
If you thought the loss Oracle suffered in May in its ongoing lawsuit against Google over Android was the end, think again.
As promised, Oracle is appealing the case, and filed its appeal today.
The two tech giants have been battling it out for years in two separate court cases over whether Google must pay Oracle billions of dollars for bits of code copied from Java (a programming language Oracle owns) and used in Android (the language Google controls).
At issue were bits of code called application programming interfaces (APIs), the technology that allows different computer programs to talk to each other.
While there's been back and forth over the years, with one side winning or losing various stages of the fight, the upshot is, Google has yet to be found liable for paying Oracle for Java, much less the massive, multi-billion dollar fine Oracle dreams of.

Chilling effect

In May, the two companies were in court arguing over what amount, if anything, Google owes after an earlier trial found that Google did in fact copy some of the Java code.
Google argued that the copying fell within the "fair use" provision of copyright law, meaning Google was free to use it. A jury of 10 unanimously agreed with Google. Oracle vowed to appeal and here we are.
In the appeal filing, seen by Business Insider, Oracle argues that the jury in May didn't get to hear all of the facts it wanted to share. Those facts included all the ways it believes Android harms Java, including how Android might one day usurp Java's role in its primary domain, as a language used to create apps and Web apps for PCs. 
Oracle's lawyers argue in the appeal filing:
“Google started trial knowing a fact it kept secret from everyone else: It was days away from announcing that 'the full functionality of Android would soon be working on desktops and laptops, not just on smartphones and tablets.'”  
Many in the tech industry have been watching this case closely. Critics argue that a big fine for Oracle could have a chilling effect on some of the ways that software developers freely use and share code today.
Google is not commenting on the appeal, although it did send Business Insider its original statement when it won the jury case in May.
"[The] verdict that Android makes fair use of Java APIs represents a win for the Android ecosystem, for the Java programming community, and for software developers who rely on open and free programming languages to build innovative consumer products."
More: Oracle Google Java Android 

IMF head: Trump is good for US economy for now, but trouble looms

IMF head: Trump is good for US economy for now, but trouble looms

donald trumpGetty Images/Pool
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — The head of the International Monetary Fund says U.S. President Donald Trump taking office is likely good for the U.S. economy in the short term, though rising American interest rates and a strengthening dollar will challenge global trade.
Christine Lagarde said Trump's plans for additional investment in U.S. infrastructure and his likely tax reforms will boost the American economy.
She says: "We have reasons to be optimistic about growth in the United States."
However, Lagarde acknowledged that Trump's policies likely will lead to "tightening that is going to be difficult on the global economy."
She also defended globalization and international trade at a time of growing protectionism in the U.S. and elsewhere in the world.
Lagarde spoke Sunday in Dubai at the annual World Government Summit.

Friday, February 10, 2017

From Obama to Trump (Video)


From Obama to Trump

2017 , HOME   

From Obama to Trump
How do we assess the legacy of President Barack Obama, especially in the wake of an election that is determined to undo many of his accomplishments? Al Jazeera attempts to form a clear-eyed perspective on this confusing period in American politics with their documentary From Obama to Trump.
When he was first elected in 2008, President Obama stood as a transformative figure of hope and change for people throughout the civilized world. The film acknowledges a myriad of positive accomplishments during his two terms in office, but it is also extremely frank in what it views as his failures. These include mounting tensions in Syria, the emergence of ISIS, trembling relations with Russia, and an economy that remains far too sluggish for many Americans.
The filmmakers view race as a particularly fascinating factor of the Obama legacy. Much of the positivity and goodwill that surrounded his election stemmed from the notion of a post-racial society. Alas, this hope might have just been an illusion as deep racial divisions continued to plague America's cities during his presidency. One brief segment of the film explores the inner city discord which led to the formation of the Black Lives Matter movement.
Obama's foreign and domestic policies are also placed under a microscope throughout the course of the film. The film smartly provides the pros and cons of each issue, including the enactment of the Affordable Care act, the Iran nuclear deal, historic climate change agreements, and escalating skirmishes in the Middle East.
From Obama to Trump summarizes the former president's legacy as a mixed bag of merits and shortcomings. Regardless of each viewer's individual take on Obama's overall job performance, one thing is for certain. President Trump was elected in large part on the promise that he would reverse many of his key actions.
So, what does it all mean? Only time will tell. After all, the true meaning of history can only reveal itself in hindsight, and the concluding chapters on the Obama presidency have not yet been determined. For this reason, the film focuses on providing thoughtful questions more than concrete conclusions.

Oil rises on signs of widespread OPEC deal compliance


Oil rises on signs of widespread OPEC deal compliance


By Karolin Schaps | LONDON
Oil prices rose about $1 on Friday after reports that OPEC members delivered more than 90 percent of the output cuts they pledged in a landmark deal that came into force in January.
Supply from the 11 OPEC members with production targets under the deal fell to 29.921 million barrels per day, according to the average assessments of the six secondary sources OPEC uses to monitor output, or a 92 percent compliance.
The International Energy Agency (IEA) - one of OPEC's six sources - said the cuts in January equated to 90 percent of the agreed reductions in output, far higher than the initial 60 percent compliance with a 2009 OPEC deal.
"Some producers, notably Saudi Arabia, (are) appearing to cut by more than required," the agency said in a report.
Global benchmark Brent crude LCOc1 was up $1.09 at $56.72 a barrel by 1400 GMT. It touched a session high of $56.73 a barrel earlier in the session.
U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures CLc1 traded up 92 cents at $53.92 a barrel.
The IEA, which advises industrial nations on energy policy, said if current compliance levels are maintained, the global oil stocks overhang that has weighed on prices should fall by about 600,000 barrels per day (bpd) in the next six months.
The agency also raised global oil demand growth expectations for 2017 to 1.4 million bpd, up 100,000 bpd from its previous estimate.
Nevertheless, producers will likely have to extend the production cuts beyond six months if they want to achieve their goal of balancing the oil market.
Weekly U.S. rig count data will be published later on Friday by Baker Hughes, indicating whether drillers are continuing to ramp up activity.
Bjarne Schieldrop, chief commodities analyst at SEB, said he expected 198 new U.S. oil rigs to come into action in 2017, with 51 added already this year.
"We calculate that one extra rig added today will lead to a stream of new wells which cumulatively will produce 5.3 million barrels to the end of 2019," he said.
(Additional reporting by Henning Gloystein in Singapore; editing by David Goodman and David Clarke)

REPORT: Trump border 'wall' to cost $21.6 billion, take over 3 years to build

REPORT: Trump border 'wall' to cost $21.6 billion, take over 3 years to build

US-Mexico border wallA Border Patrol vehicle sits along the US-Mexico border wall on January 25, 2017 in San Ysidro, California. Sandy Huffaker/Getty Images
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump’s “wall” along the US-Mexico border would be a series of fences and walls that would cost as much as $21.6 billion, and take more than three years to construct, based on a US Department of Homeland Security internal report seen by Reuters on Thursday.
The report’s estimated price-tag is much higher than a $12-billion figure cited by Trump in his campaign and estimates as high as $15 billion from Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
The report is expected to be presented to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary John Kelly in coming days, although the administration will not necessarily take actions it recommends.
The plan lays out what it would take to seal the border in three phases of construction of fences and walls covering just over 1,250 miles (2,000 km) by the end of 2020.
With 654 miles (1,046 km) of the border already fortified, the new construction would extend almost the length of the entire border.
Many cost estimates and timelines have been floated since Trump campaigned on the promise of building a wall. The report seen by Reuters is the work of a group commissioned by Kelly as a final step before moving forward with requesting US taxpayer funds from Congress and getting started on construction.
A DHS spokeswoman said the department does "not comment on or confirm the potential existence of pre-decisional, deliberative documents."
A White House spokeswoman said it would be “premature” to comment on a report that has not officially been presented to the president.
The report said the first phase would be the smallest, targeting sections covering 26 miles (42 km) near San Diego, California; El Paso, Texas; and in Texas's Rio Grande Valley.
The report assumes DHS would get funding from Congress by April or May, giving the department sufficient time to secure contractors and begin construction by September. Trump has said Congress should fund the wall upfront, but that Mexico will reimburse US taxpayers. Mexico has said it will not pay.
Several US congressional delegations are visiting the border this month to assess funding needs, according to several people familiar with the travel plans.
The report shows the US government has begun seeking waivers to address environmental laws on building in some areas. It also shows the government has begun working with existing contractors and planning steel purchases for the project.
Trump told law enforcement officials on Wednesday, "The wall is getting designed right now."
The report accounted for the time and cost of acquiring private land, one reason for its steep price increase compared to estimates from Trump and members of Congress.
Bernstein Research, an investment research group that tracks material costs, has said that uncertainties around the project could drive its cost up to as much as $25 billion.
The second phase of construction proposed in the report would cover 151 miles (242 km) of border in and around the Rio Grande Valley; Laredo, Texas; Tucson, Arizona; El Paso, Texas and Big Bend, Texas. The third phase would cover an unspecified 1,080 miles (1,728 km), essentially sealing off the entire US-Mexico border. 
back turned mexico wallJorge Duenes/Reuters

Barriers to construction

The report lays out costs to cover the border with barriers, but funding constraints and legal battles are likely to place limits on those plans.
It also does not account for major physical barriers, like mountains, in areas where it would not be feasible to build.
A source familiar with the plans said DHS may have to go to court to seek eminent domain in order to acquire some of the private land needed to cover the final and most ambitious phase.
The first phase, estimated to cost only $360 million, could be a relatively easy way for Trump to satisfy supporters eager to see him make good on his campaign promises to limit illegal migration. But the rest of the construction will be markedly more expensive, covering a much larger stretch of land, much of it privately owned or inaccessible by road.
In addition to seeking eminent domain and environmental waivers, the US government would also have to meet the requirements of the International Boundary and Water Commission, a US-Mexico pact over shared waters. The report estimated that agreement alone could bring the cost from $11 million per mile to $15 million per mile in one area. 
(Reporting by Julia Edwards Ainsley; Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and Alistair Bell)
Read the original article on Reuters. Copyright 2017. Follow Reuters on Twitter.
More: Reuters Wall Mexico border 

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600