Friday, July 8, 2016

UK consumer confidence just plunged at the fastest rate in 22 years — thanks to Brexit

UK consumer confidence just plunged at the fastest rate in 22 years — thanks to Brexit

dive fall divingREUTERS/Matthew Childs
British consumers saw their confidence in the UK's economy fall at the sharpest rate in almost 22 years after the vote to leave the European Union, according to the latest survey from market research firm Gfk.
In a special survey commissioned in the week or so after the Brexit vote, Gfk found that consumer confidence in the UK fell by 8 points following the referendum.
It's the biggest drop since late 1994, when Britain was in the middle of a recession and a housing crash.
Here's the chart showing just how substantial the fall was, courtesy of Gfk:
Screen Shot 2016 07 08 at 09.11.42Gfk
 And here's the key extract from Gfk's release (emphasis ours):
Incorporating the same measures we use each month in the Consumer Confidence Barometer (CCB), we can assess – rather than guess - consumer confidence right now. The results show that confidence has dived, with the core Index falling 8 points to-9, and that all of the key measures used to calculate the Index have fallen. For context, this long-running survey dates back to 1974, and there has not been a sharper drop than this for 21 years (December 1994).
On a region-by-region basis, confidence took the biggest hit in the north of England and Scotland, falling more than 10 points. In the south, including London, it eased just two points. 16-29 year olds were the most optimistic consumers overall, despite their confidence falling 13 points.
The most hard hit sectors of consumer spending in the post-Brexit economic landscape are those products that are so-called "discretionary" purchases — basically stuff we want and can buy when times are good, but don't actually need. Things like holidays, new clothes, meals out and so on. As Joe Staton, Gfk's head of market dynamics noted, according to the FT:
Our analysis suggests that in the immediate aftermath of the referendum, sectors like travel, fashion and lifestyle, home, living, DIY and grocery are particularly vulnerable to consumers cutting back their discretionary spending. As we’ve learnt from previous periods of uncertainty, consumers turn to well-known brands they love and trust as a guarantee of quality and value for money. Now is the time for companies to understand and respond to consumer concerns by anticipating and meeting their needs.
While falling consumer confidence is symptomatic of the UK's vote to leave the EU it is also a troubling pre-cursor to economic turmoil.
Generally speaking, consumers are the great rescuers of the economy, but if they stop spending, things could go very bad, very quickly. As we pointed out in March, people have shifted spending from consumer goods to food, suggesting that disposable income has lowered significantly, which has in turn led people to exhaust their savings.
With uncertainty dominating, it is only natural that instead of spending on consumer goods, British citizens will look to increase their savings to weather any potential storm. Ironically, that is likely to make things even worse. 
The logic is simple — when people are worried about the state of their finances, they stop spending, and when people stop spending, that can signal serious problems on a macroeconomic scale.
As we noted earlier this week, a recent note from Morgan Stanley argued that growing political uncertainty globally has the potential to impact heavily on consumer spending, particularly in areas where major political events will happen or have happened.
So, if falling consumer confidence leads to a plunge in consumer spending, that could signal serious trouble ahead for the British economy.
As Emily Nicol, an analyst at Daiwa notes:
"Evidence that Brexit-related uncertainty is providing a massive hit to the UK economy is starting to stack up.
Consumers’ assessment of the future outlook for the UK economy was even more pessimistic than that headline measure, with the relevant index falling to -29, a level not seen since late 2012 when GDP growth was negative. All of the other major survey components posted significant declines too with a striking fall (the most since the start of 2011) in the measure related to willingness to make major purchases."

The company that buys Yahoo could end up paying $1 billion to Mozilla for nothing

The company that buys Yahoo could end up paying $1 billion to Mozilla for nothing

Marissa MayerYahoo CEO Marissa Mayer.REUTERS/Elijah Nouvelage
Yahoo  $37.67
YHOO+/-+0.15%+0.40
Disclaimer
In late 2014, Yahoo struck a deal with Mozilla to make it the default search engine on all Firefox browsers in the US.
That deal, which cost Yahoo $375 million in 2015, was meant to help Yahoo expand its search market share and better compete with Google.
But with the company now up for sale, the Yahoo-Mozilla deal could end up backfiring and cause potential Yahoo buyers to rethink their bidding price for the internet company.
It's because of a hidden clause in the agreement that allows Mozilla to walk away from the deal and still get paid $375 million every year through 2019 if the company gets sold, according to Recode's Kara Swisher. She writes:
"According to the change-of-control term, 9.1 in the agreement, Mozilla has the right to leave the partnership if — under its sole discretion and in a certain time period — it did not deem the new partner acceptable. And if it did that, even if it struck another search deal, Yahoo is still obligated to pay out annual revenue guarantees of $375 million."
That means if Yahoo's core internet business gets acquired by a company that Mozilla doesn't like, Mozilla could strike a new search deal with another company, like Google, and still get paid over $1 billion total over the next three years.
Swisher writes that the main reason Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer struck such an aggressive deal was because she thought Yahoo had conceded too much ground to Google in search and that she could win back some market share. She also didn't anticipate a change of control.
Either way, this is just one of the many wrinkles that any potential Yahoo buyer would have to consider before placing a final bid for the company. The third round of bids were expected on Wednesday and final bids are expected by July 18. Currently, Verizon and a number of private equity firms are reported to be in the race to buy Yahoo's internet business.
Yahoo's representative was not immediately available for comment.

UK's Osborne meets Chinese officials in post-Brexit trade push: source

UK's Osborne meets Chinese officials in post-Brexit trade push: source

Britain's Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, speaks at The Times CEO summit in London, Britain June 28, 2016.  REUTERS/Neil Hall  Britain's Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, speaks at The Times CEO summit in London Thomson Reuters
LONDON (Reuters) - Finance minister George Osborne met senior Chinese officials in London on Thursday to discuss trade following Britain's vote to leave the European Union, agreeing to work to foster stronger ties between the two countries, a source close to Osborne said.
Britain's trading relations with the rest of the world have been thrown into sharp relief by the June 23 vote to leave the EU, through which it has negotiated its trade deals for decades.
The source said Osborne had "productive discussions on investment, financial services, and fostering stronger trading ties" when Britain is outside the EU.
The meeting formed part of the preparations for a G20 finance ministers meeting in Chengdu later this month. Osborne will use that trip to visit several cities to promote UK-China relations in light of the referendum result.
(Reporting by William James, Editing by Kylie MacLellan)
Read the original article on Reuters. Copyright 2016. Follow Reuters on Twitter.

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

Forget Brexit — Italy is poised to tear Europe apart

Forget Brexit — Italy is poised to tear Europe apart

RubensItaly right now Wikipedia Commons
Italy is on the cusp of tearing Europe apart but the economic and political crisis brewing in the nation is largely going unnoticed.
All eyes have turned to Britain's vote to leave the European Union as having the most drastic political and economic impact onto the 28-nation state but if you look at the country's economic data, bank issues, and the impending constitutional referendum coming up, Italy is like a bomb waiting to explode.
The Italian financial system, which to put it gently, is in a major state of flux right now. While Britain's EU referendum in June was seismic in terms of having economic and political repercussions across the bloc, there is another referendum of equal importance, coming up in Italy in October, and the result could fundamentally alter the state of the already delicate Italian economy.
Italians will have a say on reforms to its Senate, the upper house of parliament, in October. The proposed reforms are widespread, and if approved could improve the stability of Italy’s political set up and allow Prime Minister Matteo Renzi to push through laws aimed at improving the country’s economic competitiveness.
If denied, Renzi’s government will most likely fall, plunging Italy back into the type of political chaos last seen after the ousting of former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, according to Deutsche BankThat, Citi says, makes the referendum "probably the single biggest risk on the European political landscape this year among non-UK issues."
“If the referendum is rejected, we would expect the fall of Renzi’s government. Forming a stable government majority either before or after a new election could become extremely challenging even by Italian standards,” Deutsche Bank analysts led by Marco Stringa said in a note to clients in May. Fears that the reforms will be rejected have intensified since the eurosceptic vote won in Britain.
DB italy productivityItalian productivity is shockingly poor Deutsche Bank
A political mess can quickly turn into a cornucopia of financial and economic disarray. According to estimates from business lobby Confindustria, if Renzi's reforms do not pass, it would push Italy into recession, lead to massive capital flight, and widen spreads on Italian debt.
Italy simply cannot afford any of those things at the moment.
Not only is the country in a state of economic and political turmoil — it has crushingly low productivity, a history of missing growth targets, and has generally underperformed the rest of Europe in recent years — but the country's banking system is also in the midst of serious, serious problems.
"One theme which could dictate near term direction for markets and which arguably Brexit has reignited and brought back to the forefront is the ailing and fragile state of the Italian banking sector," Deutsche Bank's Jim Reid noted in his daily Early Morning Reid on Tuesday.
The country's financial sector is plagued by an enormous surfeit of bad loans so great that the government was, in April, forced into rallying bank executives, insurers and investors to put €5 billion (£4.2 billion, $5.57 billion) behind a rescue fund for its weakest banks. The Atalante fund is designed to buy so-called bad loans from lenders and invest in their shares in the hope that the re-energized banks will lend more to businesses and spur growth.
However, Monte dei Paschi di Siena — the oldest bank in the world and weakest bank in Italy— is in possession of a bad loan book of around €47 billion (£39.9 billion) right now, and that has got the European Central Bank very worried. On Monday, the ECB's banking supervisor insisted that Monte dei Paschi must cut that book by €8 billion by the end of 2017, and by another €6 billion by the end of 2018.

“The bank has immediately initiated discussions with the European Central Bank in order to understand all the indications included in this draft letter, and to present its reasoning before the final decision, expected by the end of July 2016,” Monte Paschi said in response to the ECB's demands.
The news sent shares in all of Italy's banks substantially lower, with Monte dei Paschi understandably bearing the brunt of the falls. Shares dropped more than 8% on Monday to just 0.3 cents, valuing the bank at €1 billion, according to the Financial Times.
Monte dei Paschi sharesBank of America Merrill Lynch
In total, the financial sector in the country has roughly €300 billion of 'bad' debt, which needs to be addressed one way or the other. This might not be such an enormous problem if it was not for the fact that, as previously mentioned, Italy's economy is chronically weak. This in turn affects the ability of the country's government to provide a viable bailout package for the banking sector. Government debt in Italy now stands at almost 140% of GDP, second only to Greece in eurozone in gross terms.
Online publication This is Money suggests that despite the assertions of Renzi that he is ready to provide assistance to bail out underperforming banks, Italy is actually around €35 billion short of having the required capital to do that.
There are now serious fears in Brussels, according to the Financial Times, that the Italian government will not be able to fund a rescue package for the banking sector.
Merkel Renzi TsiprasMatteo Renzi with Greek PM Alexis Tsipras and German chancellor Angela Merkel REUTERS/Yves Herman
That has led to Italy going to Brussels for assistance, something that has so far been rejected, as it would be in contravention of EU rules.
"We have established specific rules as far as recapitalisation of the banks is concerned," German chancellor Angela Merkel said over the weekend.
"We can’t come up with new rules every two years. The Commission is ready to help, but so far it has not been convinced by what has been proposed by Italy."
Despite that rejection, Renzi — who is now known in some circles as the "Demolition Man" for his efforts to shake up the Italian political system — is reportedly ready to bypass the EU and act unilaterally to protect the financial system.
"We are willing to do whatever is necessary [to defend the banks], and do not rule out acting unilaterally, although that would only be as a last resort," a source "familiar with the government’s thinking" told the FT. Renzi himself has said he will not be "lectured by the schoolteacher."
While several suggestions have been made — including boosting the size of the Atlante fund, and launching a separate fund, a sort of spin-off to Atlante, that will look to specifically buy up bad loans issued during Italy's last recession — it currently looks like there won't be a concrete solution to the banking crisis any time soon.
Add to this the fact that any fix created could get totally dismantled if Renzi and his party lose the reform referendum and the government falls. The Italian financial system is teetering on a precipice without much hope of a solution. Brexit may be the biggest problem facing Europe right now, but Italy isn't far behind.

Tesla told regulators about Autopilot crash nine days after accident

Tesla told regulators about Autopilot crash nine days after accident

A Tesla Model S involved in the fatal crash on May 7, 2016 is shown with the top third of the car sheared off by the impact of the collision of the Tesla with a tractor-trailer truck on nearby highway and came to rest in the yard of Robert and Chrissy VanKavelaar in Williston, Florida, U.S. on May 7, 2016.  Courtesy Robert VanKavelaar/Handout via REUTERSA Tesla Model S involved in the fatal crash on is shown with the top third of the car sheared off by the impact of the collision of the Tesla with a tractor-trailer truck on nearby highway and came to rest in Williston Thomson Reuters
By Alexandria Sage and Paul Lienert
SAN FRANCISCO/DETROIT (Reuters) - Tesla Motors alerted regulators to a fatality in one of its electric cars in partial self-driving Autopilot mode nine days after it crashed, the company said on Tuesday, defending its decision not to make the accident public before a federal investigation was announced.
Tesla learned about the crash of the Model S sedan in Florida "shortly" after the May 7 crash, and on May 16 it disclosed the incident to the government. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on June 30 announced a probe.
The news comes as the company faces pressure on several fronts. Its bid to buy rooftop solar power company SolarCity has been questioned by investors, and over the U.S. July 4 holiday weekend, it disclosed that second-quarter vehicle production missed company targets.
Autopilot is one of the most advanced and most promoted Tesla technologies and is still in beta or test mode. That has spurred questions - including in an article by Fortune magazine - over whether the company and regulators should have informed the public earlier of the fatality.
On Tuesday, Chief Executive Elon Musk tweeted in response to the article about the timing of the disclosure that the May fatality "wasn't material" to Tesla.
Tesla raised at least $1.46 billion from investors on May 18-19 with a stock offering, as the Autopilot investigation was unfolding.
The company knew of the crash by the time of the capital raising. But its own investigation was not yet complete and it had not yet been informed by the government of its probe, according to a timeline described by a Tesla spokeswoman.
The windshield was ripped off the Model S after it plowed into the side of a truck on a divided highway, and the damage meant the car was unable to transmit data to Tesla. Tesla learned of the accident "shortly thereafter" from local authorities, the spokeswoman said.
The company was obligated to disclose the fatality to regulators during its third quarter but notified them earlier, on May 16, as it was investigating.
"Tesla then provided NHTSA with additional details about the accident over the following weeks as it worked to complete its investigation, which it ultimately concluded during the last week of May," the spokeswoman said.
NHTSA spokesman Bryan Thomas said the investigation was "active" and the agency would not comment further.
TESLA SAYS DISCLOSURE WAS NOT NECESSARY
Asked why the company did not disclose the incident ahead of the share sale and ahead of its recently announced bid to acquire SolarCity, Tesla issued the following statement:
"Tesla does not find it necessary, nor does any automaker, to share the details of every accident that occur in a Tesla vehicle. More than a million people die globally every year in car accidents, but automakers do not disclose each of these accidents to investors, let alone before those investigations are complete and without regard to what the results of those investigations end up being."
Tesla shares fell as much as 4 percent on the first trading day after the accident was disclosed but then ended the day up 2 percent.
The spokeswoman said the reaction showed investors agreed with the company. "The market apparently understands this," she said.
Tesla have swung widely this year and are down about 11 percent so far. The stock dived on news of Tesla's SolarCity bid, falling more than the value of its offer. Its shares ended down 1.16 percent on Tuesday, the first trading day after disclosing the production shortfall.
Peter Henning, a law professor at Wayne State University in Detroit, said Tesla probably should have informed investors of the crash before its stock offering and SolarCity offer.
"The materiality issue is not about the death itself, but more about the circumstances of the crash and calling into question a technology that's important to Tesla's future," Henning said.
"Those are issues that investors want to know, so you could make a reasonable argument that it crossed the (materiality) line. When it's that close, the (U.S.) Securities and Exchange Commission expects disclosure."
The SEC did not immediately respond to an after-hours request for comment.
(Editing by Peter Henderson and Cynthia Osterman)
Read the original article on Reuters. Copyright 2016. Follow Reuters on Twitter.

UBS: 'Gold has entered a new phase'

UBS: 'Gold has entered a new phase'

The price of gold will continue to shoot up in 2016, and has now "entered a new phase" of growth in the post-Brexit world, thanks to a variety of macroeconomic factors. 
The gold price has increased 24% this year so far.
And the risks to the global economy  will make it the go-to investment for the rest of 2016, according to UBS strategist Joni Teves in a note circulated to clients on Tuesday.
As a result, Teves and her team have increased their annual forecast for gold to an average of $1280 per ounce, compared to $1225 previously. Teves notes that she expects an average gold price for the rest of 2016 of roughly $1340, and in the short-term, gold will likely hit $1400 per ounce.
Teves notes that she expects an average gold price for the rest of 2016 of roughly $1340, and in the short-term, gold will likely hit $1400 per ounce.
Here's the key reasoning behind that forecast, from UBS' Global Precious Metals Comment note (emphasis ours):
Key drivers include: 1) low/negative real rates, 2) the view that the dollar has peaked against DM currencies, and 3) lingering macro risks. We expect the next leg to be driven by an extension of the trend of strategic portfolio allocation into gold from a diverse set of investors. This trend should now deepen, attracting more participants and encouraging those who have been hesitating to get more involved. Relatively orderly retracements, which have typically been shallow and brief indicates strong buying interest. This suggests that gold's floor is likely higher now given an even stronger fundamental argument for holding gold.
Teves continues (emphasis ours):
The UK's vote to leave the EU further underpins gold's macro narrative, reinforcing the themes of further dovish shifts in monetary policies, consequently lower yields, and heightened uncertainty. We continue to expect US real rates to fall from here and ultimately for equilibrium real rates to settle lower and have limited upside. These factors justify strategic gold allocations across different types of investors and we expect this trend to continue.
UBS said that the UK's vote to leave the EU has reinforced the risks facing the global economy, boosted uncertainty, and helped to crystallise worries about the effectiveness of unconventional monetary policies like negative interest rates. All of this combines to create an environment where gold is a hugely attractive investment.
That belief is corroborated by the explosion in the price of the precious metal since June 23rd, when Britain voted out of the EU. Prices have increased by around $100 per ounce since the vote, equivalent to around 8.5%. Here's the chart:
gold post referendumInvesting.com
UBS' report includes some brilliant charts, including this one to show just how strong gold's rally has been so far in 2016 (note that it is the second-best performing major asset class):
gold ytd ubsUBS
UBS' call on the price of gold is just the latest in a series of bumps to forecasts on the precious metal following Britain's vote to leave the EU.
It is, however by no means the most bullish prediction about the future of gold to be released in the past few days. On Tuesday, Christopher Wood, an analyst at CLSA argued that the inability of central banks to exit unconventional monetary policies safely will cause gold to eventually more than triple in price. "A long-term bullish view is maintained on gold bullion, with the ultimate price target now set at $4,200 an ounce," Wood wrote in a note to clients.

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600