Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Xi heads to Africa summit as Chinese investment slows

Xi heads to Africa summit as Chinese investment slows

[JOHANNESBURG] African leaders and Chinese President Xi Jinping will hold two days of talks in Johannesburg starting Friday as the continent seeks to secure further massive investment despite China's economic slowdown.
A slew of deals are expected to be announced for power plants, infrastructure and agriculture projects, but analysts say Chinese largess in Africa has already been reined in this year.
China drove the commodity boom as it bought up oil, iron ore, uranium and copper from around the world over the past decade, but its growth has dipped this year, triggering a sharp slump in prices.
Speaking to reporters in Beijing, vice minister of foreign affairs Zhang Ming billed China's "new normal" as a boon to Africa, saying the continent was now at "the early stage of industrialisation".
"China-Africa cooperation has now come to a stage where it needs to be upgraded and transformed," he said.
But Africa is already feeling the pinch, with Chinese investment falling by more than 40 per cent in the first half of 2015, according to official data.
"The rhetoric will probably be very excitable, as usual. You have got to separate the rhetoric from reality," Ian Taylor, professor of international relations at the University of St Andrews, told AFP. "We are likely to see a more sober meeting point between China and Africa."
Mr Xi will hold talks with South African President Jacob Zuma in Pretoria on Wednesday before the sixth Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) opens at a convention centre in Johannesburg's financial district of Sandton.
"China's packages towards Africa are going to be more diversified," said Yun Sun, China expert at the US-based Brookings research organisation.
"The Chinese always emphasise that its economic engagement in Africa is not altruistic.
"In some cases, Beijing is willing to put up with a loss, but I think Xi is going to be very careful. Their foreign reserves aren't unlimited."
China became Africa's largest trading partner in 2009, with volumes expected to exceed US$300 billion this year.
Ahead of FOCAC, China emphasised it had delivered more than US$117 million of aid to affected areas during the Ebola crisis in West Africa, and also sent hundreds of medical workers to help.
Among many African countries hit by the Chinese slowdown, Zambia exemplifies the impact of falling commodity prices.
Its economy relies on exports of copper, the price of which has fallen 30 per cent this year.
"We have to find other export products to China. I am certain that China requires something outside copper from us," said Commerce Minister Margaret Mwanakatwe, who will attend the summit.
"The price of copper going down has led to job losses in the mines and the kwacha (local currency) to depreciate (by 45 per cent)."
Zambian President Edgar Lungu last week ordered no new road projects to be started to save on spending.
Nigeria, the continent's largest economy, has been another major player in China's recent involvement in Africa.
At least 40 official development projects have been financed there by Beijing since 2004, including a US$2.5 billion loan for rail, power, and telecommunications projects.
The Chinese have also provided military aid and equipment, and are building a new terminal at Abuja airport.
"They're not going to let up on their very well-flagged goal of being on the front foot across the continent," said Ryan Wibberley, an emerging market equity dealer at Investec in Cape Town.
Mr Xi - accompanied by his wife Peng Liyuan - arrives in South Africa after a brief visit to Zimbabwe, where Chinese projects have helped support an economy plunged into crisis under President Robert Mugabe's rule.
AFP

These are the most attractive cities for investment - By Joe Myers Nov 13 2015

These are the most attractive cities for investment

Singapore is the world’s most attractive city for investment, according to a report from JLL Real Views.
The report uses fDiIntelligence data to outline the cities that are most attractive to investors by the number of greenfield investment projects in 2014.
The following chart is taken from the report and highlights the positions of the ‘Big Six’ cities activities – London, New York, Paris, Tokyo, Hong Kong and Singapore. These are the six cities that have absorbed the biggest shares of financial and business services.
1511B31-investment cities most attractive singapore london shanhai jll chart
Following Singapore in second place is London, while Shanghai completes the top three.
The list has a strong European and Asian feel, and is dominated by some of the world’s major financial centres. However, there is place for Bangalore in 8th – reflecting global interest in India as an investment market, as highlighted by a recentEY report.
Two Australian and US cities – Melbourne and Sydney, and New York and San Francisco – also feature, as well as Toronto and Dubai.
To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Author: Joe Myers is a Digital Content Producer at Formative Content.
Image: Joggers run past as the skyline of Singapore’s financial district is seen in the background April 21, 2014. REUTERS/Edgar Su 

5 immigrants who made it in America as entrepreneurs

5 immigrants who made it in America as entrepreneurs

Ellis IslandFlickr/andrewcparnellEllis Island.
“Immigration has always been a key to America’s future. We are more than a country founded by immigrants. We are a country whose competitive strengths are in entrepreneurship and immigration. When you consider how many companies are founded by immigrants, you realize that immigration is fundamental to any long-term economic growth and prosperity. The high-skill immigration question is simple: Would you rather have more great technology companies here in the U.S. or abroad?” -Reid Hoffman, Co-Founder and Executive Chairman of LinkedIn, Partner at Greylock Partners
Located in Silicon Valley and with its roots in YCombinatorInstavest has seen first hand the diversity that flourishes in America. For this week, we’ve put together profiles of five notable immigrants, some of whom were refugees, from the technology and investing worlds:

View As: One Page Slides


Sergey Brin, Co-Founder of Google, President at Alphabet

Sergey Brin, Co-Founder of Google, President at Alphabet
Getty Images / Justin Sullivan
Sergey Brin was born in Moscow and immigrated to the U.S. at the age of 6, as his family fled persecution at the hands of the Soviet Union. Brin’s father was quoted saying that he was “forced to abandon his dream of becoming an astronomer even before he reached college.” With far more opportunity in the United States than his father had in the Soviet Union, Sergey enrolled at Stanford to pursue his PhD in Computer Science. It was there that he met Larry Page, eventually dropping out to co-found Google. The rest is history.
Today, Brin is worth approximately $30 billion, according to Forbes, and is now acting as President of Google’s newly formed parent company,Alphabet, with projects such as Google’s self-driving car under his jurisdiction. He has made it a point to give back to the charity that helped his family come to the U.S. during his childhood.

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla Motors, CEO and CTO of SpaceX

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla Motors, CEO and CTO of SpaceX
Lucy Nicholson / REUTERS
Known for revolutionizing electric cars and trying to send humanity to space, Elon Musk has been an immigrant twice in his life. He was born in South Africa, moving to Canada for his undergraduate studies (his mother had Canadian citizenship) before immigrating to the United States to enroll at the University of Pennsylvania to complete his bachelor’s degree. Following graduation, he began his PhD in Applied Physics at Stanford, dropping out in exactly 2 days. After 10 years of living in the United States, Musk was granted citizenship.
His career began by co-founding a company called X.com, which eventually led him to be CEO of PayPal, making him a part of the notoriously successful PayPal mafia. Beyond Tesla (which has shared its patents publicly) and SpaceX, Musk is also Chairman of SolarCity and wrote a paper on the HyperLoop, laying out a concept for hypersonic travel from Los Angeles to San Francisco. He recently made comments that climate change refugees will dwarf today’s refugee crisis in the future. While Musk is controversial at times, few disagree with the fact that he’s changing the world.

Pierre Omidyar, Founder of eBay

Pierre Omidyar, Founder of eBay
REUTERS/Tim Shaffer
EBay founder and chairman Pierre Omidyar in Delaware, December 7, 2009.
Pierre Omidyar is a French born Iranian entrepreneur, best known for being the founder of eBay. He was born in Paris to Iranian parents who immigrated to complete their educations - his mother as an academic and father as a surgeon. When Pierre was young, his parents elected to move to the U.S., where his interest in computers began, ultimately leading to Tufts University where he earned a degree in Computer Science. 7 years later, in 1995, he foundedeBay (originally known as Auction Web).
Omidiyar went on to found the Omidyar Network in 2004 with his wife, Pamela, as a philanthropic investment vehicle. In 2010, Omidyar Network announced a grant of $2.6 million to Refugees United to help refugees reunite with their families and has continued toprovide support to refugees. He has since founded and funded First Look Media, home to renowned journalist Glenn Greenwald.

Chamath Palihapitiya, Founder & CEO of Social Capital, Part-Owner of the Golden State Warriors

Chamath Palihapitya made a name for himself as the VP of User Growth in the early days at Facebook. He oversaw the social network’s growth from 50 million users to 750 million. Born in Sri Lanka, he moved to Canada with his family at the age of five as his father was posted to Ottawa for the Sri Lankan High Commission. Due to political turmoil in their native country, his family applied for refugee status to remain in Canada, finding Sri Lanka too unsafe for them to return. After graduating from the University of Waterloo in 1999, he moved to the United States and joined AOL, before moving to Facebook.
In 2011, he founded the Social+Capital Partnership, as one of the earliest and more successful venture capital funds focused on impact investment. He is also one of the founders of FWD.us, a lobbying group focused on immigration reform, led by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerbergas well as an Executive Board Member of the reigning NBA champions, the Golden State Warriors.

George Soros, Founder and Chairman of Soros Fund Management

George Soros, Founder and Chairman of Soros Fund Management
REUTERS/Bernadett Szabo
George Soros
One of the world’s most prolific and successful investors, George Soros has had quite a life. Born in Hungary in 1930 to Jewish parents (his father has fled Russia as a prisoner of war in WWI), he was 14 years old when Nazi Germany occupied Hungary. His family went into hiding, surviving the Siege of Budapest and escaping to England in 1947. Soros earned his Bachelor’s and PhD in Philosophy from the London School of Economics. In 1970, he established Soros Fund Management and became its Chairman.
After a legendary career that earned him a net worth of nearly $25 billion - including his role in the infamous incident of Black Wednesday, Soros announced that his fund would be closed to outside investment in 2011. His Quantum Fund, created in 1973, has generated over $40 billion, making it the most successful hedge fund in history.
Soros has been outspoken about his own life as a refugee who fled persecution. Moreover, he is one of the world’s most active philanthropists, having given over $11 billion to a variety of causes around the world. He founded Open Society Foundations in 1993, stating, “My success in the financial markets has given me a greater degree of independence than most other people. This allows me to take a stand on controversial issues: In fact, it obliges me to do so because others cannot.”

What does reserve currency status mean for China, and the world?

What does reserve currency status mean for China, and the world?

This article is published in collaboration with The Conversation.
The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has decided to include the renminbi (RMB) in its basket of reserve currencies. The RMB, or yuan, has joined the US dollar, euro, British pound and Japanese yen to become the fifth member of the basket used to value the Fund’s own de facto currency, the Special Drawing Rights (SDRs).
151201-IMF special drawing rights basket renminbi china
More than a membership
On the surface, the impact of the decision looks relatively modest. The value of the SDR will be based on a weighted average of the values of the basket of currencies. Only about 2.5% of the US$11.5 trillion of foreign reserve assets are held in the form of SDRs, of which the RMB is expected to account for 11% of the basket (higher than the yen and the pound).
Looking more broadly, however, the inclusion of the RMB (aka the “redback”) in the SDR’s currency basket is bound to have profound implications.
Apart from the RMB’s new acceptance in international trade, settlement and investment, the ultimate aim is to be accepted as a reserve currency, used by central banks to hold foreign exchange reserves. It is estimated that the SDR inclusion should lead to about US$42 billion of reserve assets being rebalanced into the RMB by central banks and reserve managers, in the medium term.
According to the IMF, the move is “an important milestone in the integration of the Chinese economy into the global financial system”.
It is also an important milestone in Beijing’s campaign to internationalise the yuan. As Robert Mundell, “father of the Euro”, declared, “great powers have great currencies”.
For China, this is an essential step in fulfilling its ambition to crown the yuan a global reserve currency. In fact, the RMB is the first currency not issued by a major advanced economy to make it to the IMF basket. More importantly, the IMF’s decision comes at a crucial time for the Chinese leadership as it seeks to demonstrate to constituents international recognition of China’s rise as a global power.
Whatever it takes
The IMF’s RMB decision also sets a precedent for the SDR basket that a basket currency is not yet fully convertible and under capital control from its issuing country. This has led to criticism that the IMF is “bending the rules” in favour of China.
The IMF, on the other hand, sees the move as a reward of “the progress that the Chinese authorities have made in the past years in reforming China’s monetary and financial systems”. Indeed, the SDR inclusion has arguably been the most attractive lure for Beijing to undertake a series of reforms of China’s financial regime.
In order to meet the IMF’s criteria of “freely usable”, China took a “whatever it takes” approach. It liberalised domestic interest rates, aligned the RMB’s exchange rate more along its market value and opened up the interbank market to foreign central banks and sovereign funds. Its treasury even issued short-term (three-month) bonds in order to complete the yield curve for RMB assets, which was seen as a prerequisite for the RMB’s SDR inclusion. Efforts have also been made via some closed-door financial diplomacy to lobby IMF member countries for the RMB’s case.
The last mile
Member countries and the market will now make preparations ahead of the October 1, 2016 date for inclusion of the RMB. It may be the last mile for the RMB’s SDR journey, but there is still a long way to go to launch the redback in the global arena.
Beijing may have convinced the IMF, but a more daunting challenge will be to convince the market. To do so, Beijing needs to demonstrate its commitment to continuing financial opening and liberalisation, to credible monetary management, and to independent decision making on the part of its financial regulators. In other words, the reforms must go on.
With the long awaiting inclusion of the RMB by the IMF, the external world has lost a vital leverage in empowering reformers and inducing domestic reform in China. Without external pressures, only the internal momentum of the reform will allow the RMB to walk the last leg towards true internationalisation.
Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.
To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Author: Hui Feng is a Research Fellow, Griffith Asia Institute and Centre for Governance and Public Policy at Griffith University.
Image: A Chinese national flag flutters in front of the headquarters of the People’s Bank of China, China’s central bank, in central Beijing. REUTERS/Petar Kujundzic.

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600