Friday, July 31, 2015

IMF approves loan to Ukraine despite debt concerns

IMF approves loan to Ukraine despite debt concerns


[WASHINGTON] The International Monetary Fund approved Friday the next installment of its massive loan to Ukraine despite uncertainty about the sustainability of the country's debt and its conflict with separatist forces.
The IMF executive board, which represents 188 member nations, gave a green light to the immediate disbursement of US$1.7 billion, part of a support program awarded in March that has caused internal strains in the Washington-based institution.
In total, the IMF has pledged US$17.5 billion in financial assistance over four years in exchange for drastic measures by the government to restore public finances, hammered by recession and the loss of part of its territory to pro-Russian separatists.
The new installment, after an initial US$5 billion disbursement released in March, comes after the IMF completed its first review of the government's progress under the loan package, which aims to "put the economy on the path to recovery" and "strengthen public finances", the IMF said in a statement.



David Lipton, the IMF's first deputy managing director, said that the Ukrainian authorities had made a "strong start" in implementing their economic program.
"The momentum needs to be sustained, as significant structural and institutional reforms are still needed to address economic imbalances that held Ukraine back in the past," Mr Lipton said in a separate statement.
Ukraine welcomed the new loan installment, saying it will be used to replenish the National Bank's reserves. "The new tranche will encourage growth in the economy and reassure financial markets both domestically and internationally," the Ukrainian finance ministry said in a statement.
But the task is Herculean. Deprived of the heart of its industrial sector in the eastern part of the country, lost to separatists, the Ukrainian economy is expected to plunge deeper into recession this year - a 9.5 per cent contraction the government estimates.
As gross domestic product shrinks, the country's debt appears on course to reach nearly 135 percent of GDP this year, compared with about 70 per cent in 2014.
Under its policy, the IMF can only provide financing if a country's debt is "sustainable with high probability."
To resolve this headache and satisfy the United States, its largest shareholder, the IMF said that Ukraine needed to find US$15.3 billion in debt relief with private creditors over the coming four years.
But the difficult debt negotiations, under way for the past several weeks, have so far produced no concrete results and increase the risk of a Ukrainian default that could further drive away investors.
The creditors, led by US investment firm Franklin Templeton, have proposed a debt reduction of 10 per cent, according to a source familiar with the discussions, far below the 40 per cent "haircut" sought by Kiev.
Mr Lipton reiterated that the Fund was prepared to continue its programme even if debt negotiations with private creditors founder.
"In the event that talks with private creditors stall, and Ukraine determines that it cannot service this debt, the Fund could continue to lend to Ukraine consistent with its Lending-into-Arrears Policy," he said.
US Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew said the US "strongly supported" the IMF's latest disbursement to Ukraine.
"We urge the creditors participating in the ongoing debt operation to reach a timely agreement with the Ukrainian authorities that fully satisfies the criteria outlined in Ukraine's IMF programme - including the debt sustainability target," Mr Lew said.
The IMF points to Kiev's "commitment" in implementing reforms, in contrast with the lack of cooperation from the Greek authorities, for the apparent difference in its approach to the two heavily indebted countries.
Since the ouster of Ukraine's pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych in early 2014, the IMF can rely on a pro-West government which has been more willing to tackle tough programmes, including an increase in gas prices.
The IMF notably has been able to count on the Ukrainian finance minister, Natalie Jaresko, an American who worked at the US State Department and became a Ukrainian citizen just before taking her post.
"Ukraine has been an incredibly encouraging situation," Christine Lagarde, the IMF managing director, said this week.
"We have seen political determination to change the face of Ukraine."
AFP

Get ready to relive the 2008 crisis: Albert Edwards CNBC

Get ready to relive the 2008 crisis: Albert Edwards


98
COMMENTSJoin the Discussion


Central banks in the Western world have set the scene for an "even bigger version" of the 2007-2008 global financial crisis, Societe Generale's bearish strategist Albert Edwards has claimed.
In a research note on Thursday, Edwards said that China's intervention to stabilize its volatile stock market was part of a larger global story, in which "rock bottom" interest rates and large fiscal deficits in the western world were pushing the global economy towards a fall. 
"QE (quantitative easing) will be stepped up to such a pace that you will hear the roar of the printing presses from Mars," Edwards said.
"I have not one scintilla of doubt that the western central banks have set us up for an even bigger version of the 2008 Great Financial Crisis."
Albert Edwards
Rukhsana Hamid | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Albert Edwards
QE has been a mainstay for several major central banks in the wake of the crisis, with money created to buy assets like government bonds, helping to inject liquidity into markets with the aim of stimulating the broader economy. 
Given his forecast step up in money-printing, Edwards said that gold, which tends to perform well during periods of high inflation, was a "must-have" safe-haven investment.

Fed rate hike: Edwards' foil?

While Edwards forecast prolonged ultra-easy monetary policy, many investors expect an interest rate hike by the U.S. Federal Reserve as early as this fall. 
"I think September is very much on play. I mean, look at where we are," Manish Singh, head of investments at Crossbridge Capital, told CNBC on Thursday. He pointed to improving U.S. GDP growth rates and unemployment, which declined to 5.3 percent in June. 
The Fed indicated on Wednesday that it was waiting for "some further improvement in the labor market," and inflation to move upwards towards its 2 percent target before raising interest rates.
Across the Atlantic, there has been speculation that a more hawkish cohort of Bank of England policymakers could soon lead to higher interest rates in Britain. 
Some economists predict that at this month's meeting, two members of the bank's Monetary Policy Committee voted in favor of rating the interest rate, rather than maintaining it at record low rate of 0.5 percent. The minutes from the meeting will be revealed next Thursday, giving a picture of how "hawkish" the hawks are. 
While Edward's bearish thoughts and predictions are widely-read by his fellow bankers and strategists, they do not always come true. 
In September 2012, for instance, he announced that the U.S. was in recession and that Wall Street would soon react, and warned of an "ultimate" death cross for the S&P 500—where the 50-month moving average falls below the 200-month moving average. Instead the S&P 500 continued to rally, and has gained nearly 50 percent since Edwards' pronouncement.
Donald Civitanova works at a post on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in New York, U.S., on Thursday, May 6, 2010.
Daniel Acker | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Donald Civitanova works at a post on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in New York, U.S., on Thursday, May 6, 2010.

Chinese intervention

Edwards' speculation on Chinese intervention comes in the wake of market volatility across Asian markets. China's central bank earlier this week said various monetary tools would be used to ensure market liquidity through to year-end, according to Reuters, following a dramatic plunge in Chinese equities, with the Shanghai Compositeclosing down 8.5 percent on Monday. 
The Chinese Securities Regulator has also said it will increase its stock purchases in an effort to prop up the market. 
The moves come as part of a tradition of intervention by the Chinese government, whose efforts to prevent to tackle market volatility included a ban earlier this month on shareholders selling large stakes in listed firms.
—With reporting from CNBC's Matt Clinch.

Is Canada ready for the dairy wars? - KONRAD YAKABUSKI


About 900 dairy cows go through the first of their twice daily milking ritual in the rotary milking parlour at J&L Walker Farms in Malahide, Ontario on Feb. 28, 2011. (Peter Power for The Globe and Mail)
KONRAD YAKABUSKI

Is Canada ready for the dairy wars?

New Zealand Trade Minister Tim Groser might be forgiven for having been a tad testy toward Canada when he arrived in Hawaii this week for negotiations on a vast new Asia-Pacific trade pact. The “Saudi Arabia of milk” has seen its dairy dream sour and Canadian protectionism is a sore spot among Kiwis.
Milk is to New Zealand’s economy what oil is to Canada’s. And after the boom, came the bust. Global milk prices have sunk 63 per cent since early 2014, the result of a supply glut not unlike the surge in shale oil production that has depressed crude prices. Facing sliding incomes, New Zealand’s dairy farmers are expected to cull one-in-six cows this year. The central bank, which cut interest rates in June and July, says more easing is needed. Many Kiwis are suddenly reassessing New Zealand’s decade-old decision to go all-in to become a global milk superpower.
As the head of giant Kiwi dairy co-op Fonterra, Theo Spierings, said in June: “The world has changed and the unprecedented global volatility we’re experiencing now is the new normal.”
The New Zealand experience is likely top of mind for Canadian International Trade Minister Ed Fast as Ottawa decides how far to go in opening up this country’s dairy sector to imports from other countries participating in the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Mr. Groser said New Zealand is looking for “commercially meaningful access” to Canada’s dairy market, but that much “hard yakka” (Kiwi for hard work) would be needed if a deal is to be reached at this week’s talks in Hawaii.
Critics of Canada’s supply-managed dairy sector, which guarantees prices to dairy farmers based on the average cost of production, say it encourages inefficiencies that cost Canadian consumers billions of dollars annually. Production quotas cap supply. And sky-high tariffs ensure our market remains closed to all but a tiny wedge of dairy imports. Canadian Council of Chief Executives head John Manley calls it “the last vestige of Soviet-style central planning on the planet.”
Advocates of opening our dairy market to global competition insist it would be a boon to the most efficient farmers and processors, allowing them to grow by exporting their products internationally. But that belies the painful fate that would likely await the vast majority of Canada’s 12,000 dairy farms. Having been sheltered from competition for so long, the relentless demands for lower costs and higher productivity would overwhelm most family-run dairy farms.
Those demands are only growing fiercer. The European Union’s move earlier this year to abolish milk quotas is expected to lead to a surge in production in countries with the most efficient dairy sectors, particularly the Netherlands, Denmark and Ireland. They are aiming to take on New Zealand in the Chinese market and will push for wider access to Canada’s dairy market than the tiny amount they stand to get in the pending Canada-Europe free-trade agreement.
Then there’s the United States, where industrial-sized dairy farms with more than 10,000 cows are not uncommon. (The average Canadian dairy farm has 77 cows.) At the TPP talks, the United States is pushing harder than any other country for access to the Canadian dairy market.
New Zealand’s dairy sector rode the Chinese boom until growth there flinched. China now has big stockpiles of whole-milk powder, New Zealand’s main export, leading most analysts to predict that low global milk prices (and a weaker Kiwi economy) will be around for a while.
That is likely good news for most of the world’s consumers, provided processors and retailers pass on those savings. But it’s bad news for New Zealand, which bet that China’s thirst for its milk would be unquenchable. Not only are European producers now eyeing the Chinese market. Domestic production is growing fast in China – one particular operation has 140,000 cows.
Were Canada to finally join the global milk market, consumers here (particularly the poorest ones) would benefit most. Dairy farmers, not so much. But that is what free trade is all about. As Adam Smith wrote in The Wealth of Nations: “It is the maxim of every prudent master of a family never to attempt to make at home what it will cost him more to make than to buy.”
Countries prosper by focusing on what they do best. New Zealand has big competitive advantages over Canada in milk production, including year-round, pasture-based dairy farming. But as New Zealanders are now discovering, being a milk superpower requires a strong stomach.

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600