Friday, May 1, 2015

Next GE mainly about leadership renewal: PM

Next GE mainly about leadership renewal: PM

Vital to bring in enough new people committed to Singapore to keep it exceptional

Singapore
LEADERSHIP renewal is the most important issue for Singapore at the next general election (GE), said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong on Friday.
Speaking at the annual May Day Rally, he said it was important to bring in enough new people who were committed to the country in order to keep Singapore exceptional.
The next general election must be held by January 2017, although observers think it could happen as soon as later this year.
The new team of leaders must be of "high ability, strong character, dedication and gumption" so that Singapore will remain special, Mr Lee told more than 4,000 people at The Star Performing Arts Centre in Buona Vista.
Sitting in the audience were his wife Ho Ching, Cabinet ministers, union and business leaders, and members of the labour movement, most of them clad in colourful polo shirts with the NTUC's signature "U" logo.
"I need your help. Give me and my team your support, so that after the next election, well before the election after the next, a younger team will be ready to lead us forward," said Mr Lee, who is also secretary- general of the ruling People's Action Party (PAP).
The prime minister described his current Cabinet as a balanced one, with a mix of some ministers having over 20 years of experience and fresher ones who came on board after the last election in 2011.
"They have mastered their portfolios, learned about politics, gained the trust of Singaporeans," he said. "But we all grow old and we all need successors."
The task of recruiting capable people to enter politics is "very hard to do", given that only a handful are suitable and even then, it is difficult to persuade them to come on board.
He recalled how, on more than one occasion, those who had been earmarked for politics had politely turned him down. They either said they didn't feel they would fit in or had family members who were against them doing so.
"I am still trying very hard, and I think I'll get a few more people to enter and join politics and stand for election. But we can never have an A-team for Singapore which is too strong," said Mr Lee.
He urged caution when people remark that Singapore need not worry too much about national leadership. He shared how some have suggested that there is already a good system in place with civil servants knowing what to do, and that it would be "more exciting" to try out a different team of leaders.
"By that logic, since Mercedes has an outstanding F1 car, there is no need to have Lewis Hamilton as the driver to win the F1 championship. The car will drive itself," said Mr Lee, insisting that national leadership made all the difference.
There was a "strong reaction" when founding prime minister Lee Kuan Yew died on March 23 because everyone recognised that it was his leadership, together with the first team of ministers, that resulted in the Singapore we have today.
His death reminded people that "exceptional leadership" made a big difference for the country, said PM Lee.
He added that Singapore, as a small country in South-east Asia with just five million people, needed to remain exceptional in order to survive.
"If we are in Europe, you might say 'if I'm something like my neighbours, that's good enough'. But in Singapore, if we say 'let's just be something like our neighbours', I think habis, liao ('finished', in Malay and Hokkien)," said Mr Lee.
Singapore is in a unique position in the world and many countries value its contributions. It is the largest foreign investor in China and Indonesia, countries that are 250 times and 50 times larger than Singapore respectively.
He also pointed out that many dignitaries attended his father's state funeral service in March, including the heads of state and heads of government of Australia, India, Japan and South Korea, and the various Asean leaders. "Would they have done that if Singapore had been an ordinary country, if Mr Lee (Kuan Yew) had been an ordinary leader?" he asked.
The strong regard that others have for Singapore has enabled the country to make friends around the world, given it a voice when events affect the nation, and allowed it freedom of action to set national directions to advance its interests.
"Investors see potential here, our businesses find doors open for them overseas, and our workers enjoy more opportunities to advance. So it's very important that we don't lose that magic," said PM Lee.
In order to stay exceptional, he listed three goals that Singapore must achieve: a successful economy; a hardworking and skilful workforce; and outstanding leadership
.

S'pore tripartism model not easy to replicate: PM Lee

S'pore tripartism model not easy to replicate: PM Lee

Struture may be replicated but 'trust . . . cannot be created overnight'

By
leeuwen@sph.com.sg@LeeUwenBT     
Singapore
THE strong tripartism in Singapore is a "precious legacy" that must be protected, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the May Day Rally on Friday.
Other countries admire and want to emulate the success of the Singapore model, he shared. Many send teams of officials here to study the work of the tripartite partners and then try to replicate the work.
"But it is not so easy. Their societies are different, their histories are different, and they don't have the long tradition of the government delivering the goods for workers and building trust with the union leaders," said Mr Lee.
"They can replicate the structures . . . but that trust, that magic, cannot be created overnight."
The prime minister said that he was "aghast" when he heard some opposition politicians describe tripartism as obsolete and that the unions should fight the government and employers.
"Either they really don't understand that, without tripartism, we would not be here today, or they are not interested in workers' welfare, and are just trying to foment trouble, to exploit workers for their own political ends," said Mr Lee.
Workers in Singapore, however, are not so ignorant, for they know that tripartism has made a difference to their lives and that the government is on their side, he added.
No other country in the world has such a strong relationship between the government and the unions, and nowhere else has such a bond lasted as long, Mr Lee claimed.
He shared how some governments elsewhere champion workers' interests and promise to protect them from competition and businesses with evil intent.
Often, however, these governments end up frightening off investors and damaging the economy, with workers losing their jobs and eventually voting the government out of power.
Then there are other governments in the world that see unions as problems, rather than partners. They try to weaken the unions, with the unions fighting back. This conflict results in a gridlock, with all parties winding up on the losing end.
In Singapore, Mr Lee said, the situation was different because of the exceptional system of tripartism in place with the government, workers and employers working constructively together on growing and upgrading the economy.
"We may not agree all of the time, but there is give-and-take because we trust one another. We rely on one another to take a longer term view of our enlightened, collective interest.
"This is a system that has delivered results not just for one or two terms of government, but for 50 years. Our unions are equal partners with employers and the government. The unions are professional, have inducted talent, and made trade unionism a profession that one can be proud of."
Mr Lee paid tribute to the work of the labour movement, adding that no other trade union congress in the world has been as effective as the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) in improving the lives of workers in Singapore over the years.
Earlier at the event, outgoing labour chief Lim Swee Say noted how this year's May Day marked the beginning of a new tripartite core team in place.
This was YCH Group chairman and CEO Robert Yap's first May Day Rally since taking over as president of the Singapore National Employers Federation last September.
On the union side, current NTUC deputy secretary-general Chan Chun Sing will become the new labour chief on Monday. On that same day, Mr Lim will begin his new role as the new Minister for Manpower.
The prime minister said that Mr Lim would make a "very good" manpower minister due to his years of experience in the NTUC, the Economic Development Board and his earlier stint as Environment Minister.
As for Mr Chan, Mr Lee said that he was sure that the incoming labour chief would "give his heart and soul" to the NTUC and the cause of workers.

Tesla's announcement shows the coming revolution in energy storage

Tesla's announcement shows the coming revolution in energy storage

[NEW YORK] Late Thursday, the glitzy electric car company Tesla Motors, run by billionaire Elon Musk, ceased to be just a car company. As was widely expected, Tesla announced that it is offering a home battery product, which people can use to store energy from their solar panels or to backstop their homes against blackouts, and also larger scale versions that could perform similar roles for companies or even parts of the grid.
For homeowners, the Tesla Powerwall will have a power capacity of either 10 kilowatt hours or 7 kilowatt hours, at a cost of either US$ 3,500 or US$ 3,000. The company says these are the costs for suppliers and don't include the cost of installation and a power inverter, so customers could pay considerably more than that.
The battery, says Tesla, "increases the capacity for a household's solar consumption, while also offering backup functionality during grid outages." At the same time, the company said it will producing larger batteries for businesses and utility companies - listing projects with Texas-based Oncor and Southern California Edison.
The anticipation leading up to this announcement has been intense - words like "zeitgeist" are being used - which itself is one reason why the moment for "energy storage," as energy wonks put it to describe batteries and other technologies that save energy for later use, may finally be arriving.
Prices for batteries have already been dropping, but if Tesla adds a "coolness factor" to the equation, people might even be willing to stretch their finances to buy one.
The truth, though, is Tesla isn't the only company in the battery game, and whatever happens with Tesla, this market is expected to grow. A study by GTM Research and the Energy Storage Association earlier this year found that while storage remains relatively niche - the market was sized at just US$128 million in 2014 - it also grew 40 per cent last year, and three times as many installations are expected this year.
By 2019, GTM Research forecasts, the overall market will have reached a size of US$1.5 billion.
"The trend is more and more players being interested in the storage market," says GTM Research's Ravi Manghani. Tesla, he says, has two unique advantages - it is building a massive battery-making "gigafactory" which should drive down prices, and it is partnered with solar installer Solar City (Musk is Solar City's chairman), which "gives Tesla access to a bigger pool of customers, both residential and commercial, who are looking to deploy storage with or without solar."
The major upshot of more and cheaper batteries and much more widespread energy storage could, in the long term, be a true energy revolution - as well as a much greener planet. Here are just a few ways that storage can dramatically change - and green - the way we get power:
1. Helping to integrate more renewables onto the grid.
Almost everybody focusing the Tesla story has homed in on home batteries - but in truth, the biggest impact of storage could occur at the level of the electricity grid as a whole. Indeed, GTM Research's survey of the storage market found that 90 per cent of deployments are currently at the utility scale, rather than in homes and businesses.
That's probably just the beginning: A late 2014 study by the Brattle Group, prepared for mega-Texas utility Oncor, found that energy storage "appears to be on the verge of becoming quite economically attractive" and that the benefits of deploying storage across Texas would "significantly exceed costs" thanks to improved energy grid reliability. Oncor has proposed spending as much as US$ 5.2 billion on storage investments in the state. California, too, has directed state utilities to start developing storage capacity - for specifically environmental reasons.
For more power storage doesn't just hold out the promise of a more reliable grid - it means one that can rely less on fossil fuels and more on renewable energy sources like wind and, especially, solar, which vary based on the time of day or the weather.
Or as a 2013 Department of Energy report put it, "storage can 'smooth' the delivery of power generated from wind and solar technologies, in effect, increasing the value of renewable power."
"Storage is a game changer," said Tom Kimbis, vice president of executive affairs at the Solar Energy Industries Association, in a statement. That's for many reasons, according to Mr Kimbis, but one of them is that "grid-tied storage helps system operators manage shifting peak loads, renewable integration, and grid operations." (In fairness, the wind industry questions how much storage will be needed to add more wind onto the grid.)
Consider how this might work using the example of California, a state that currently ramps up natural gas plants when power demand increases at peak times, explains Gavin Purchas, head of the Environmental Defense Fund's California clean energy program.
In California, "renewable energy creates a load of energy in the day, then it drops off in the evening, and that leaves you with a big gap that you need to fill," says Mr Purchas. "If you had a plenitude of storage devices, way down the road, then you essentially would be able to charge up those storage devices during the day, and then dispatch them during the night, when the sun goes down. Essentially it allows you to defer when the solar power is used." This will be appealing to power companies, notes Mr Purchas, because "gas is very quick to respond, but it's not anywhere near as quick as battery, which can be done in seconds, as opposed to minutes with gas." The consequences of adding large amounts of storage to the grid, then, could be not only a lot fewer greenhouse gas emissions, but also better performance.
2. Greening suburban homes and, maybe, their electric cars, too.
Shifting away from the grid to the home, batteries or other forms of storage have an equally profound potential, especially when paired with rooftop solar panels.
Currently, rooftop solar users are able to draw power during the day and, under net metering arrangements, return some of it to the grid and thus lower their bills. This has led to a great boom in individual solar installations, but there's the same problem here as there is with the grid as a whole: Solar tapers off with the sun, but you still need a lot of power throughout the evening and overnight.
But storing excess solar power with batteries, and then switching them on once the solar panels stop drawing from the sun, makes a dramatic difference. Homes could shift even further away from reliance on the grid, while also using much more green power.
Moreover, they'd also be using it at a time of day when its environmental impact is greater. "If you think about solar, when it's producing in the middle of the day, the environmental footprint is relatively modest," explains Dartmouth College business professor Erin Mansur. That's because at this time of day, Mr Mansur explains, solar is more likely to be displacing electricity generated from less carbon intensive natural gas. "But if you can shift some of that to the evening . . . if you can save some to the middle of the night, it's more likely to be displacing coal," says Mr Mansur.
Some day, perhaps, some of the sun-sourced and power could even be widely used to recharge electric vehicles like Teslas - which would solve another problem. According to a much discussed 2012 paper by Mr Mansur and two colleagues, electric vehicles can have a surprisingly high energy footprint despite their lack of tailpipe emissions because they are often charged over night, a time when the power provided to the grid (said to be "on the margin") often comes from coal.
But if electric vehicles could be charged overnight using stored power from the sun, that problem also goes away.
All of which contributes to a larger vision outlined recently by a team of researchers at the University of California at Los Angeles's Institute of the Environment and Sustainability in which suburban homeowners, who can install rooftop solar combined with batteries and drive electric vehicles, start to dramatically reduce their carbon footprints - which have long tended to be bigger in suburbia, due in part to the need for long commutes - and also their home energy bills.
Granted, it's still a vision right now, rather than a reality for the overwhelming number of suburbanites - but energy storage is a key part of that vision.
3. Helping adjust to smart energy pricing
And there's another factor to add into the equation, which shows how energy storage could further help homeowners save money.
For a long time, economists have said that we need "smart" or "dynamic" electricity pricing - that people should be charged more for power at times of high energy demand, such as in the afternoon and early evening, when the actual electricity itself costs more on wholesale markets. This would lead to lower prices overall, but higher prices during peak periods. And slowly, such smart pricing schemes are being introduced to the grid (largely on a voluntary basis).
But if you combine "smart" pricing with solar and energy storage, then homeowners have another potential benefit, explains Ravi Manghani of GTM Research. They could store excess power from their solar panels during the day, and then actually use it in the evening when prices for electricity go up - and avoid the higher cost. "There's an economic case to store the excess solar generation and use it during evening hours," explains Manghani by email.
Notably, if there are future reductions in how much money solar panel owners can make selling excess power back to the grid - and that's one thing the current pushback against net metering wants to achieve - then energy storage comes in and gives panel owners a new way for using that power.
"Storage increases the options," explains Sean Gallagher, vice president of state affairs at the Solar Energy Industries Association. "It's an enabling technology for solar. It allows customers to meet more scenarios economically."
So in sum - cheaper, more easily available energy storage helps at the scale of the power grid, and also at the level of our homes, to further advantage cleaner, renewable energy. So if the economics of storage are finally starting to line up - and its business side to ramp up - that can only be good news for the planet.
WP

Shell, Total align trading and refining units to drive profit growth

Shell, Total align trading and refining units to drive profit growth

By
[LONDON] Top oil firms Royal Dutch Shell and Total are bringing their refining and trading operations closer together, seeking alternative ways to drive profits as oil prices fall and independent trading houses expand into their territory.
The restructuring will enable the Anglo-Dutch and French companies' in-house traders to capture profits faster from the fluctuating prices of the different crude oil sources and products coming through their refineries.
Snapping at their heels are energy brokerages Vitol and Gunvor, which have bought refining plants in Europe in the last two years in order to do the same. "As traders grew assets in downstream, majors realised there was a lot of money to be made on optimisation. So to a certain extent, trading houses encouraged us to change," said a high level source from one of the oil firms, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to speak publicly on the matter.
Shell and Total have already started work on aligning their refining and trading operations and as a result both reported much better than expected first quarter profits Now both are stepping up the restructuring.
Shell plans to move dozens of traders from London, Dubai and Singapore to Rotterdam, where it is beefing up a trading hub just miles from its flagship Pernis refinery, Europe's largest, according to company and trading sources. It also plans to lay off dozens more traders as part of the move to a cheaper cost-base. "We are completing staff consultation and finalising the design of the proposed change," a Shell spokesman said.
Meanwhile Total is beefing up its Geneva trading hub so that a bigger team of dealers can optimise profits from the volatility of crude prices, company sources told Reuters.
It is simultaneously restructuring its refining businesses to expand its product line, by converting its unprofitable La Mede plant in southern France to a biodiesel plant and upgrading its Donges refinery on the Atlantic coast to capture growing demand for low-sulphur marine gasoil following changes in EU rules.
Total is being more tight lipped about the reforms and only said this week that "downstream again generated excellent results due to its ongoing restructuring efforts".
A refinery closely linked to trading operations can modify its output to respond to swift changes in global demand for products - such as a boost for diesel or gasoline after unplanned outages or bad weather - and lock in high profits.
Refineries that process several kinds of crude oil can leverage profits from the different prices of, say, Russian Urals or Nigerian Bonny Light, by linking trading teams into their operations.
Shell's chief financial officer Simon Henry said Shell made an extra US$1 billion last year thanks to its restructuring, and added that profits would likely increase this year.
The action took return on capital in downstream at Shell to 13.4 percent last year, 5 percentage points higher than for the overall group and up from below 10 percent several years ago. "It is not often in this industry that the downstream has had a higher return on capital than the upstream," said Mr Henry.
Oil companies' refining operations have become increasingly unprofitable in recent years as the Middle East and Asia have built their own refineries to meet their own demand.
Total's chief executive Patrick Pouyanne was praised last year for merging refining and petrochemical businesses after the group reached its target of return on capital earlier than forecast - 15 per cent in 2014, up from 9 per cent in 2013.
Not all oil majors have followed Shell and Total's steps. While BP has a large global trading division, the world's biggest listed oil company ExxonMobil - which has a much small global refining business - uses its trading division mostly to buy in supply for its own refineries.
REUTERS

New York Times not giving up on print just yet

New York Times not giving up on print just yet

[NEW YORK] For the New York Times, it will be "All the News That's Fit to Print" - literally - for a while yet.
Mark Thompson, chief executive of the New York Times Co , says that while the company's digital business is the future, he isn't giving up on print.
"We are determined to do everything we can do to defend print advertising," Mr Thompson said in an interview. "Print advertising is not going to be a part of the growth story of the New York Times, but for economic reasons it matters very much that we hold it as much as we can."
The Times, like other newspapers, has been under immense pressure to find new avenues of growth as print advertising revenue shrinks and spending moves toward digital ads, which are cheaper and offer quick and quantifiable returns.
But revenue from print advertising still accounts for more than two-thirds of the Times' advertising revenue.
The paper scrapped its Home and Automobiles sections recently, but debuted a Men's Style monthly section in April that focuses on fashion and lifestyle.
The Times also, in Mr Thompson's words, "brilliantly relaunched" the New York Times Magazine in February.
The magazine, as well as "T: The New York Times Style Magazine", were growing revenue, he said. "Digital is the main growth area. But where we can invest in what I call 'islands of growth' or 'segments of growth' in the print side, we will do that," Mr Thompson said.
Thompson said that while the Times had a long way to go, he believed it was doing a good job of not just defending but increasing market share in print advertising.
The Times' total average digital circulation rose 14.2 per cent to 1.55 million for Monday-Friday in the three months to March 31, according to data from the Alliance for Audited Media published on the Times' corporate website on Friday. Sunday digital circulation rose 10.7 percent to 1.48 million.
Average print circulation was 625,951 Monday-Friday, a drop of 6.8 per cent, and 1.15 million for Sunday, a fall of 5.2 per cent. The company said in its quarterly results announcement on Thursday that print ad sales fell 11 per cent in the quarter, while digital ad revenue increased 10.7 per cent.
Digital advertising revenue was US$42.3 million, or 28.2 per cent of total advertising revenue of US$149.9 million. "We believe that on the print side we are doing significantly better than our competitors," Mr Thompson said.
REUTERS

US orders BNP Paribas to pay US$8.9b in sanctions case

US orders BNP Paribas to pay US$8.9b in sanctions case

[NEW YORK] A US judge Friday ordered BNP Paribas to pay a record US$8.9 billion fine to settle violations of US sanctions linked to Iran and other countries.
Judge Lorna Schofield finalised a sentence that also included a five-year probation and the imposition of a monitor at France's largest bank.
In June 2014, BNP Paribas agreed to plead guilty to criminal charges that it had violated the sanctions, deliberately hiding thousands of transactions with Iran, Sudan and Cuba during 2004-2012 that senior bank officials knew broke US law.
At the time, the bank also agreed to the record penalty. In July the court approved the plea agreement.
Most of the penalty is based on the amount of the illegal transactions BNP handled: US$6.4 billion in Sudan, US$1.7 billion in Cuba and US$650 million in Iran.
In addition, BNP Paribas will pay $140 million in fines.
BNP Paribas "has taken many steps" to address the violations, the bank's chief counsel, Georges Dirani, told the court.
"There is no question the organisation will not tolerate the kind of behavior we saw in this case," the lawyer said.
As part of the court action, the Justice Department announced plans to compensate victims using the proceeds of BNP Paribas's fine.
Justice Department officials said the agency is in the early phases of establishing a program to compensate victims harmed by the regimes in Sudan, Iran and Cuba.
The department will set up a website and collect information from potential claimants for 90 days before announcing next steps, said Jennifer Ambuehl, an official with Justice's office of assets and forfeiture.
Ambuehl said such a compensation program would be "unprecedented" for a case of this kind.
"The government believes it is important to set up a process... for individuals who suffered harm," said Andrew Goldstein, an assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York.
AFP

US on track to reach deals on forex rigging as soon as May

US on track to reach deals on forex rigging as soon as May

[NEW YORK] US authorities are on course to reach multi-billion-dollar agreements with five major banks over allegations of foreign exchange market rigging as soon as the second half of May, people familiar with the matter told Reuters on Friday.
Talks between the banks and the US Department of Justice are at an advanced stage, and the collective settlement may well exceed the US$4.3 billion in fines paid by a half-dozen banks to US, UK and Swiss regulators last November.
The banks or units of them also are likely to plead guilty to criminal charges, sources said. Which entities will plead and the exact charges are still in flux, although one person said antitrust violations are probable.
The five banks are JPMorgan Chase & Co, Citigroup , British banks Royal Bank of Scotland and Barclays and Swiss bank UBS.
The agreements would resolve probes of how traders manipulated the largely unregulated US$5-trillion-a-day foreign exchange market. Transcripts of online chat rooms made public in November show how traders shared confidential information about client orders and otherwise conspired to benefit their own transactions.
Peter Carr, a spokesman for the Justice Department, declined to comment.
RBS and Barclays this week set aside a further US$1.71 billion for investigations and litigation involving foreign exchange. RBS's US$510 million brought its total FX provision to US$1.1 billion and Barclays' additional US$1.2 billion raised its total to US$3.2 billion.
UBS could set aside more for possible fines or settlements when it reports first-quarter results on Tuesday.
In its first-quarter earnings report this week, RBS said settlement discussions with the DOJ and "certain other financial regulatory authorities" are at an "advanced" stage. Chief Executive Ross McEwan said he expected a resolution with the DOJ some time in the second quarter.
Barclays pulled out of November's coordinated global settlement due to issues with the New York Department of Financial Services, the state banking regulator headed by Benjamin Lawsky.
Barclays may agree to a partial settlement with the New York regulator this month, but last week Lawsky said the agency was not ready to resolve its investigation of the British bank's automated trading platform.
The four other banks involved in talks with the Justice Department are not licensed or regulated by the New York agency.
Barclays also is likely to settle separate probes by Britain's Financial Conduct Authority and the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission about the same time as it completes the Justice Department deal, a person familiar with the matter told Reuters. Both the FCA and CTFC declined to comment. The four other banks came to terms with those authorities in November.
A Barclays executive said Wednesday the bank wants to resolve the probes as "expeditiously" as possible, but a spokeswoman otherwise declined to comment.
The US Federal Reserve also is expected to extract penalties as part of the latest settlements with the banks, sources said. A spokesman for the agency declined to comment.
While the punishments will sting harder than expected and more than they did in November, they won't signal an end to the FX rigging scandal. US authorities are still expected to continue investigations into whether the computer programmes banks use for forex trades are rigged in favour of them over clients.
The US Justice Department and Britain's Serious Fraud Office also have opened cases against individuals, which could take years to be resolved.
REUTERS

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600