Sunday, March 22, 2015

World leaders remember Lee Kuan Yew for creating stable nation

World leaders remember Lee Kuan Yew for creating stable nation

[KUALA LUMPUR] Lee Kuan Yew was the "father" of modern Singapore who helped bring his country and Southeast Asia into the modern era, according to former US President George W Bush.
Mr Lee, who died on Monday at 91, was Singapore's first elected prime minister, a Cambridge University-trained lawyer who led the nation from 1959 to 1990.
"The nation he leaves behind is an influential force for stability and prosperity and a friend to the United States," Mr Bush said in a statement.
Mr Bush's father, former US president George H W Bush, said he was proud to have called Mr Lee a friend.
"I respected his effective leadership of his wonderful, resilient and innovative country in ways that lifted living standards without indulging a culture of corruption," he said.
Mr Lee was hospitalised on February 5 to treat severe pneumonia, where he was sedated and put on mechanical ventilation. As leader, he crafted a legacy of encouraging foreign investment, averting corruption and emphasizing discipline, efficiency and interracial harmony. His elder son, Lee Hsien Loong, has been prime minister since 2004.
Leaders from Australia and New Zealand both noted the elder Mr Lee's contribution to the development of modern Singapore.
Mr Lee was a "giant of our region" who 50 years ago led a "vulnerable, fledgling nation to independence," Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott said on Monday in a statement.
"Thanks to his leadership, Singapore is now one of the world's most prosperous nations, a financial powerhouse, and one of the world's easiest places to do business," Mr Abbott said.
New Zealand Prime Minister John Key cited Mr Lee's work to set up the Association of South-east Asian Nations, "which has offered cohesion and stability in a diverse region." "He was well known for his insights and foresight but what struck me most was his unwavering determination to see Singapore succeed."
BLOOMBERG

President Tony Tan pays tribute to Lee Kuan Yew

President Tony Tan pays tribute to Lee Kuan Yew

President Tony Tan Keng Yam has conveyed his condolences to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong on the death of his father Lee Kuan Yew.
In his condolence letter, Dr Tan said that Singapore's former prime minister who died early Monday morning was "the architect of our modern Republic" and had dedicated his entire life to Singapore.
"Few have demonstrated such complete commitment to a cause greater than themselves," Dr Tan said in the letter, which was also shared on his Facebook page.
"Without his remarkable foresight and relentless pursuit of Singapore's development, the Singapore that we know today would not exist. Singapore was his passion and he continued serving till the last days of his life."
"Singaporeans owe an eternal gratitude to Mr Lee Kuan Yew. The greatest tribute that Singaporeans can pay him is to treasure and build upon the legacy that Mr Lee and his team have left us, and make Singapore an even better home for our future generations," said Dr Tan.
Dr Tan's condolence letter is reproduced in full here:
"Dear Hsien Loong
On behalf of the people of Singapore, I would like to convey my most heartfelt condolences to you and your family on the passing of your dear father, Mr Lee Kuan Yew.
Mr Lee dedicated his entire life to Singapore from his first position as a legal advisor to the labour unions in the 1950s after his graduation from Cambridge University to his undisputed role as the architect of our modern Republic. Few have demonstrated such complete commitment to a cause greater than themselves.
Mr Lee was elected into the British Legislative Assembly in 1955 and became Singapore's first Prime Minister after leading the PAP to victory in the 1959 general elections when Singapore was granted full internal self-government. At that time, Singapore faced problems of high unemployment, poor infrastructure and a hostile external environment. To secure Singapore's access to land, water and natural resources, Mr Lee led Singapore to join the Federation of Malaysia before declaring independence from Britain in 1963. However, the problems were exacerbated when Singapore lost its economic hinterland after our forced separation from Malaysia in 1965. Many doubted if Singapore could survive as a nation but Mr Lee rallied our people together and led his cabinet colleagues to successfully build up our armed forces, develop our infrastructure and transform Singapore into a global metropolis.
Even when Singapore's urban development was still in its early phases, Mr Lee already had the vision of establishing Singapore as a liveable Garden City. Mr Lee initiated the ambitious project to clean up the Singapore River and Kallang River which were then heavily polluted by garbage, sewage and industrial waste. The Singapore River now forms part of the Marina Bay, which is not only a valuable source of fresh water for our city state, but also a place which is enjoyed by Singaporeans and tourists from around the world. Mr Lee also set up the Housing Development Board to develop our public housing estates to give every citizen a stake in the nation. Today, because of Mr Lee's farsightedness, Singapore is hailed as a model of sustainable and inclusive development for developing cities around the world.
Mr Lee made lasting contributions towards the building of a meritocratic and multi-cultural Singapore. As Singapore's first Prime Minister, Mr Lee put in place measures to ensure that university places, government contracts, and appointments into public office would go to the most deserving candidates based on merit and regardless of race and religion. Mr Lee also established English as the common working language and the main medium of instruction in our schools so that all Singaporeans would have equal opportunities to learn, communicate and work regardless of race. Each ethnic group was encouraged to learn its mother tongue as a second language to preserve the cultural and community identity of the group. Because of these policies, Singaporeans today are able to leverage on our bilingual and bicultural edge to take advantage of the opportunities that present themselves around the world.
A leader who placed service before self-interest, Mr Lee stepped down as Prime Minister in 1990 to allow for a smooth leadership renewal after he had built up a younger team of Cabinet Ministers. Nevertheless, he continued to serve and advance Singapore's interests at home and abroad as Singapore's Senior Minister from 1990 to 2004 and then as Minister Mentor from 2004 to 2011. He had spent more than 50 years in the cabinet and was the world's longest-serving Prime Minister when he stepped down in 1990.
Through Mr Lee, Singapore earned international recognition and established cooperative relations with major countries affecting our region. Mr Lee was one of the first to recognize China's potential under Deng Xiaoping's reforms. Mr Lee's brilliant intellect and candour of opinion led many international leaders and foreign diplomats to seek his views on developments in the region and around the world. Widely revered as a senior statesman, Mr Lee was conferred numerous international accolades throughout his political career.
Many aspects of our lives bear Mr Lee's imprint - be it our HDB estates, our gardens, or the SAF. Without his remarkable foresight and relentless pursuit of Singapore's development, the Singapore that we know today would not exist. Singapore was his passion and he continued serving Singapore till the last days of his life. Singaporeans owe an eternal gratitude to Mr Lee Kuan Yew. The greatest tribute that Singaporeans can pay him is to treasure and build upon the legacy that Mr Lee and his team have left us, and make Singapore an even better home for our future generations.
Our thoughts are with you at this time of sorrow.
With my deepest sympathies,
TONY TAN KENG YAM"

Rush by leading nations to join China-sponsored AIIB accelerates

Rush by leading nations to join China-sponsored AIIB accelerates

By
btworld@sph.com.sg
Tokyo
THE scramble by leading nations outside the region to join the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) is intensifying, with Australia likely to announce a decision as early as this week to begin entry negotiations in a growing show of international support for the Beijing-based institution.
Leading Western European players including France, Germany and Italy rushed to declare an interest after Britain "jumped the gun" last week in becoming the first Western nation to join talks on the AIIB - pleasing China but angering some European Union members.
Critically, Japan may see no alternative but to join the "stampede" too, sources told The Business Times, while emphasising that the US is softening what appeared to be its initial refusal to join, and that South Korea also cannot afford to stay out.
But despite the momentum the AIIB has achieved in a very short time, highly placed officials at the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in Manila - which is most threatened by the advent of the AIIB - told BT that the China-sponsored initiative still faces potentially major obstacles.
One of these is that national parliaments in the more than 30 countries which have signed a memorandum of understanding on joining entry negotiations could refuse to give budgetary ratification to finance their countries' shareholding in the public body while serious governance issues are still at stake in the AIIB.
Another potential problem is that civil society organisations in prospective member governments outside Asia could mount a powerful lobby against entry, and even China could find itself the target of their ire. The "Chinese may not know what hit them", one senior ADB official told BT.
Governance issues extend far beyond concerns that the AIIB might not observe the same environmental standards and other societal safeguards that most existing multilateral development banks do.
There are fears that the bank could serve to further China's national interests in and beyond Asia, by having the bank headquartered in Beijing and headed by a Chinese president. It could also award the lion's share of multi-billion-dollar infrastructure projects to Chinese enterprises.
China is also planning to dispense with the practice followed by other multilateral development banks of having resident "executive directors" at the AIIB to monitor projects constantly on behalf of shareholder governments.
Chinese officials in general have maintained silence in public on such matters - largely because they are fearful of "being criticised" by Communist Party heads in Beijing if they speak out of turn, one senior Chinese academic told BT.
But some Chinese sources in close touch with events insist that efforts will be made to accommodate the concerns of non-Asian countries. "They have no choice," said Xing-Guang Ling, a member of the AIIB Joint Research Group in Tokyo, last Friday. "Developing countries also want to see a debate on these issues."
Another member of the group, ex-Japanese diplomat Makoto Taniguchi, said that "China should be more balanced and give the presidency to another country, not necessarily Japan". But he added that "if Japan wants influence, it should join. We cannot afford to (simply) oppose" the AIIB.
The Joint Research Group, comprising academics and former diplomats, presented proposals last week to Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's government, calling on Japan to join the list of countries committed to joining talks before the deadline of March 31 set by Beijing expires.
Cooperation on the AIIB could serve to create a better atmosphere between China and Japan, strengthening regional cooperation and even helping to soften China's attitude on the issue of the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea, said Mr Taniguchi, a former Japanese ambassador to the UN.
While a plethora of Asian nations (including Singapore) expressed early interest in joining AIIB talks, Japan (along with the US) was a prominent standout. But last Friday, Japanese Finance Minister Taro Aso said that Japan could consider joining if governance issues and the problem of debt sustainability in borrowing countries are addressed.
The US has been presented as being an implacable opponent of the AIIB - which is seen as threatening the postwar architecture of multilateral financial institutions that were created principally under the guidance of the US. However, a senior US diplomat, who did not wish to be identified, told BT that "we are going to get the Europeans involved, and eventually the United States in some capacity, I'm sure".
In their Tokyo briefing, both Mr Ling and Mr Taniguchi drew attention to the fact that, in a speech at the end of last month, US undersecretary of state for political affairs Wendy Sherman had effectively given official endorsement to the AIIB.
The US "welcomes new initiatives such as the China-proposed Asian International Infrastructure Bank, provided its founding documents and practices uphold the high standards of other development institutions", she said on Feb 27.
Australia's Treasurer Joe Hockey said last week that Canberra has been considering joining the AIIB. "There is a lot of merit in it but we want to be sure there are proper governance procedures," he was reported as saying.
South Korea's Ministry of Finance, meanwhile, said in a statement that Seoul would make a decision on whether to join the bank "through close consultation with major countries", and after considering economic advantages and disadvantages.
UK Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne's decision to announce Britain's entry to talks on the AIIB has, meanwhile, undermined the joint position of leading European nations in seeking assurances from China that governance standards would be met, a German diplomat who did not wish to be identified, told BT.
Washington was also taken off-guard by Britain's move, which some sources suggested to BT might have been motivated by a desire to have a prospective AIIB regional office located in London and by a desire to attract renminbi financing business to the City of London.
Despite a breaking of ranks among potential non-Asian members of the AIIB, sources say few countries can afford to stay out of entry talks given the potential financial clout of the bank, which is expected to draw mainly on foreign currency holdings in China to finance its business.

Singapore's founding father Mr Lee Kuan Yew dies aged 91 at 3.18am on Monday

Singapore's founding father Mr Lee Kuan Yew dies aged 91 at 3.18am on Monday

PUBLISHED ON MAR 23, 2015 4:32 AM
 780 559 1 10PRINTEMAIL
 
Former Singapore prime minister Lee Kuan Yew has died at the age of 91. -- PHOTO: ST FILE

SINGAPORE - Singapore's founding father, Mr Lee Kuan Yew, has died, leaving behind the unlikely nation that he and his colleagues fostered and built over five decades as his lasting legacy.
Mr Lee, who would have turned 92 this September, died at the Singapore General Hospital where he had been warded for severe pneumonia since Feb 5.
A statement from the Prime Minister's Office said: "The Prime Minister is deeply grieved to announce the passing of Mr Lee Kuan Yew, the founding Prime Minister of Singapore. Mr Lee passed away peacefully at the Singapore General Hospital today at 3.18 am. He was 91."
"Arrangements for the public to pay respects and for the funeral proceedings will be announced later."
Mr Lee leaves behind his sons, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, 63, and Mr Lee Hsien Yang, 57, daughter Dr Lee Wei Ling, 60, daughters-in-law Ho Ching, 61, and Lee
Suet-Fern, 56, seven grandchildren and two siblings. His wife, Madam Kwa Geok Choo, died in 2010, at the age of 89.
 
The elder Mr Lee is widely regarded as the man most instrumental in shaping Singapore, from the time he and his People's Action Party colleagues pushed for self-government in the 1950s, to their quest for merger with Malaysia in the early 1960s, and their efforts to secure the country's survival after independence was thrust on it on Aug 9,1965.
He famously wept on that occasion, which he immortalised as "a moment of anguish", not only as he had believed deeply in a unified Malaysia as a multi-racial society, but also as he must have sensed the enormity of the task for this fledgling state to make a living in an inhospitable world.
He would lead a pioneer generation of Singaporeans to overcome a series of daunting challenges, from rehousing squatters in affordable public housing, rebuilding the economy after the sudden pull-out of British forces and the oil shocks of the 1970s, and a major economic recession in the mid 1980s. Through it all, Mr Lee would exhort his people to take heart and "never fear" as they looked forward to a better life.
"This country belongs to all of us. We made this country from nothing, from mud-flats... Over 100 years ago, this was a mud-flat, swamp. Today, this is a modern city.
Ten years from now, this will be a metropolis. Never fear!" he thundered at a grassroots event in Sembawang in September 1965.
He delivered on this promise, earning the trust of generations of voters. This would see his party returned to office repeatedly over three decades. By the time he stepped down in 1990, he had served 31 years as PM, from 1959 to 1990. At the age of 67, he chose to hand over the premiership to Mr Goh Chok Tong, and took on the role of senior minister, serving as guide and mentor in the Cabinet.
Noting this unusual willingness to relinquish power, Time magazine wrote in 1991: "What really sets this complex man apart from Asia's other nation-builders is what he didn't do: he did not become corrupt, and he did not stay in power too long. Mao, Suharto, Marcos and Ne Win left their countries on the verge of ruin with no obvious successor. Lee left Singapore with a per capita GDP of $14,000, his reputation gilt-edged and an entire tier of second-generation leaders to take over when he stepped down in 1990.
"Lee now basks in the wisdom of seniority, a latter-day Doge whose views continue to be sought by statesmen and commentators who travel from all over the world to pay court to him in Singapore."
Later, when PM Lee took charge in 2004, the elder Lee became Minister Mentor, taking a further step back from being a prime mover in government and spending his time pondering the longer term challenges facing Singapore.
His decades in office were not uncontroversial. Having survived life-and-death battles with the communists and communalists in Singapore's tumultuous early years, he made plain that he was not averse to wielding the proverbial big stick, declaring his readiness to confront political foes with "knuckle dusters". He insisted that he would not rule by opinion polls, rejecting the idea that popular government entailed a need to be popular through his term, believing that voters would come round when they eventually saw the results of policies he had pushed through.
As he said in an interview for the book, Lee Kuan Yew: The Man And His Ideas: "I'm very determined. If I decide that something is worth doing, then I'll put my heart and soul to it. The whole ground can be against me, but if I know it is right, I'll do it. That's the business of a leader."
He was both a visionary and a radical thinker. He was instrumental in a host of major policies that have shaped almost every aspect of Singaporeans' lives, from promoting public housing, home ownership and later estate upgrading, to adopting English as a common language for the disparate races in Singapore society which would also help it plug into the global economy, to his lifelong passion for planting trees and keeping the island "clean and green" long before such environmental-consciousness became fashionable.
In 2005, after decades of being stoutly opposed to gambling, he surprised many when he indicated that he had changed his position and backed the introduction of two integrated resorts with casinos. His reasoning was direct and simple: it was necessary, if Singapore was to stay relevant in a changing world. As always, his ultimate arbiter was "what works", and furthered Singapore's interests.
As former President S R Nathan, who worked closely with Mr Lee in several roles in government over the years, recalled in an interview: "His first and only priority was the good of Singapore and its people... his mind never stopped working as he mulled over the issues, big and small, that confronted Singapore.
"If he travelled anywhere, he was always asking if something he saw could be applied in Singapore. He would grill anyone he met for ideas that could be useful... he was totally preoccupied with our survival and prosperity."
In one memorable National Day Rally speech in 1988, Mr Lee declared that Singapore was his life's work, adding half in jest, that "even from my sick bed, even if you are going to lower me into the grave and I feel something is going wrong, I will get up" to alert Singaporeans to any perils he saw ahead.
That he did to the very end, urging Singaporeans to have more babies and be more open to and welcoming of immigrants in order to deal with the rapid ageing of the population, which became a recurrent theme of many of his speeches in his later years.
He carried on with his public duties after retirement, and even after the loss of his beloved wife of 63 years, Madam Kwa, whom he married secretly when they were undergraduates in Cambridge in 1947. He mourned her deeply, but mostly in private, including gazing at pictures of happy times with her, when he sat alone at their dinner table in 38 Oxley Road, where he and Mrs Lee had shared years of companionship.
His two-part memoirs, The Singapore Story, which became a bestseller in several languages, noted how he and his colleagues believed that Malaysian leaders expected that an independent Singapore would fail and be forced to seek readmission to the Federation - this time on Malaysia's terms. Mr Lee had other plans, and declared:
"No, not if I could help it. People in Singapore were in no mood to crawl back after what they had been through."
"The people shared our feelings and were prepared to do whatever was needed to make an independent Singapore work. I did not know I was to spend the rest of my life getting Singapore not just to work but to prosper and flourish."
Asked once if he would have done things differently if he could live life over, he replied with characteristic candour: "All I can say is, I did my best. This was the job I undertook, I did my best, and I could not have done more in the circumstances. What people think of it, I have to leave to them. It is of no great consequence.
What is of consequence is I did my best."
 
 

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600