Thursday, December 8, 2016

China just gave the clearest signal yet that its economy is bouncing back

China just gave the clearest signal yet that its economy is bouncing back

Photo: Getty Images.
If there was any doubt the Chinese economy is humming again, it’s surely been dispelled today.
Chinese trade data has beaten across the board in October, a good sign for not only its economy but global demand as a whole.
According to China’s General Administration of Customs, the value of both imports and exports increased from a year earlier in US dollar terms, the first time that’s been seen since October 2014.
Exports increased by 0.1%, an improvement in the 7.3% decline seen in the 12 months to October and stronger than the 5.0% contraction expected.
It was the first time since March this year that the value of exports increased in year-on-year terms.
In yuan-denominated terms, and reflective of the strength in the US dollar over the past year, the value of exports grew by a stronger 5.9%.
The news was even better on the other side of the ledger with the value of imports increasing by 6.7% from a year earlier, the fastest expansion reported since September 2014.
In yuan-denominated terms, that figure swelled to 13% over the same period.
In volume terms, copper, crude oil, iron ore and coal imports all surged, partially in response to the Golden Week holiday in early October.
Copper imports jumped to 380,000 tonnes, up from 290,000 tonnes in October, while crude oil imports surged to 32.35 million tonnes from 28.79 million tonnes reported previously.
Iron ore and coal imports increased to 91.98 and 26.97 million tonnes respectively, up from 80.8 and 21.58 million tonnes a month earlier.
With the value of imports slightly outpacing the increase seen in exports, the nation’s trade surplus narrowed to $US44.61 billion, down from $US49.06 billion in October.
Markets had been expecting the surplus to narrow to $US46.3 billion.
The rebound in both exports reflects improved demand, not only for raw materials but also for Chinese-made goods abroad.
It also reflects the recovery in commodity prices seen in 2016, helping to stir inflationary pressures after years of disinflation and, in some instances, outright deflation.
Indeed, according to data released by the NBS last month, producer price inflation (PPI) grew by 1.2% year-on-year in October, the fastest 12-month increase seen since December 2011.
Reflective of improved demand, Chinese manufacturing PMI — a gauge on activity levels in the sector from one month to the next — jumped to 51.7 in November, the equal highest reading since April 2012.
It all points to an economy that is strengthening heading into 2017.
“The improvement reflects a strengthening in global demand, with recent business surveys suggesting that developed economies are on track to end the year on a strong note,” said Julian Evans-Pritchard, China economist at Capital Economics.
However, whether that momentum can be maintained will likely be determined by the actions taken by US president-elect Donald Trump once he takes office.
During his presidential run, Trump said he would label China as a currency manipulator, promising to slap a tariff of 45% on Chinese exports entering the US.
Should Trump follow through with this threat, it’s highly unlikely that the recent improvement will last.
Follow Business Insider Australia on FacebookTwitter, and LinkedIn

Goldman Sachs is responsible for a massive chunk of the 'Trump rally' (GS)

Goldman Sachs is responsible for a massive chunk of the 'Trump rally' (GS)

Business Insider
 Dec. 7, 2016, 11:10 AM
Lloyd Blankfein
The stock market has gone on quite a tear since the election of Donald Trump. In fact, the colloquial name for the recent surge in the market is the "Trump rally."
One company has stood above the rest during this "Trump rally," however.
As noted by market legend Art Cashin, the director of floor operations at UBS and long-time trading veteran, Goldman Sachs, one of the 30 stocks making up the Dow Jones Industrial Average index, has been responsible for a huge amount of the increase in that index. From Cashin's daily commentary on Wednesday (emphasis added):
"The Dow closed up 35 points and almost 23 of those points came from Goldman Sachs (GS). In fact, our good friend and fellow trading veteran, Jim Brown, at Option Investor, points out that GS has rallied $57 since the election. That means that GS has provided 441 of the 1363 points that the Dow has rallied. In case your calculator batteries are dead, that's about one third of the rally, all due to Goldman."
In fact, the recent jump for Goldman has put the stock at an all-time high.
Investors seem to be betting that the deregulation of the financial industry - Trump and his new Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin have talked about rolling back the Dodd-Frank Act passed after the financial crisis - and rising interest rates in the bond market could be a boon for Goldman.
Trump was sometimes critical of the bank prior to the election, even featuring Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein in an ad highlighting people that the candidate claimed did not have America's interests in mind. Blankfein came out after the ad in support of Hillary Clinton.
Trump has hired a number of Goldman Sachs alums in powerful administration positions, including Mnuchin, who was a Goldman banker for 17 years.
Screen Shot 2016 12 07 at 10.34.25 AM
Click here for more news

RELATED STOCKS

Goldman Sachs235.071.63%Goldman Sachs

GAINERS & LOSERSMORE

DOW JONESS&P 500NASDAQ 100
52.10
3.03 %
132.46
2.89 %
79.31
2.85 %
60.06
-0.36 %
111.10
-0.86 %
31.19
-1.17 %

MARKET VIEW

Your Personalized Market Center
S&P/TSX 60897.88+7.36+0.83

Wednesday, December 7, 2016

Citi is being investigated for its role in the pound's 'flash crash'

Citi is being investigated for its role in the pound's 'flash crash'

An employee of the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) reacts as he works at the bourse in Tokyo August 9, 2011. The Nikkei stock average closed down 1.7 percent on Tuesday, having trimmed losses on bargain hunting after the index tumbled more than 4 percent in the wake of a plunge on Wall Street and a downgrade of U.S. sovereign debt.Citi's Japanese operation is being investigated.REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon
Citi's Japanese trading operation is being closely investigated by the Bank of England for its role in October's "flash crash" of the poundthe Financial Times reports.
The report claims that while Citi did not start the crash, its Japanese trading operation made things worse by placing a large number of sell orders after the initial fall began, citing people with knowledge of the investigation.
The problem reportedly stemmed from one trader. The paper quotes an unnamed source as saying the trader in question "panicked" when the pound started to fall.
Sterling plunged to a three-decade low in Asian trade in early October, falling as much as 6% in just 2 minutes. While the motivation for the initial fall is not clear, traders said at the time that thin trading volumes meant the impact was outsized and created a downward spiral as the slump triggered more algorithms to sell. The FT says that the Citi trader in question fired off multiple sell orders, sending the pound spiralling.
Citi told Business Insider in a statement: "Sterling fell sharply following a news event just after midnight UK time, when the GBP spot foreign exchange market was extremely illiquid.
"Citi managed the situation appropriately and our systems and controls functioned throughout the period."
The Bank of England has said possible triggers for the initial crash include: "A large trade executed erroneously (a so-called “fat finger” error), the use of a poorly calibrated execution algorithm, unsophisticated retail trading, or a deliberate attempt to move the price lower."
It added that it was investigating the possibility of "idiosyncratic actions of individual market participants in driving the subsequent price falls." Citi was not named in the report.

Tuesday, December 6, 2016

Top Republican says he won't back Trump's plan for huge tariffs

Top Republican says he won't back Trump's plan for huge tariffs

Kevin McCarthyKevin McCarthy. Mark Wilson/Getty Images
House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy declined on Monday to support President-elect Donald Trump's proposal to impose a 35% tariff on companies that leave the US.
The California Republican was responding to a series of tweets from Trump over the weekendoutlining his plan to impose a large tariff against companies that ship jobs overseas. The tariff would be imposed on the goods shipped back into the US.
Speaking to reporters, McCarthy warned that it would lead to a trade war.
"I don’t want to get into some type of trade war," McCarthy said.
McCarthy, the No. 2 Republican in House leadership following House Speaker Paul Ryan, said he would not commit to bringing that tariff proposal to the House floor for a vote, adding the Republican Party's efforts at tax reform would create an improved business environment and would render such a tariff unnecessary.
"I think there are other ways to achieve what the president-elect is talking about," McCarthy said, "but the only way you can do any of this is you’ve got to do tax reform. And that’s why I think that will be a cornerstone of what we do."
"Tax cuts and deregulation will make the American economy great again, but tariffs and trade wars will make it tank again," he continued.
McCarthy was also pressed about the deal to provide $7 million in incentives to Carrier over 10 years in order to keep roughly 1,000 jobs in Indiana, a deal that has been criticized by many free-marker conservatives such as former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.
"Do you want to know my philosophical belief?" McCarthy said. "I believe in the free market. I don’t think government should be picking winners and losers."
He cautioned reporters against judging what Trump will do ahead of taking office.
"Take a deep breath," he said. "He’s not sworn in yet. I know you gotta write news, but let’s not predetermine what the outcome is yet. ... Is he president of the United States right now? So what did he give them? He has no authority yet to give them anything."

CARNEY: Britain is in 'the first lost decade since the 1860s'

CARNEY: Britain is in 'the first lost decade since the 1860s'

Bank of England Governor Mark Carney delivers the Liverpool John Moores University's Roscoe Lecture, at the BT Convention Centre in Liverpool, Britain December 5, 2016.Bank of England Governor Mark Carney delivers the Liverpool John Moores University's Roscoe Lecture, at the BT Convention Centre in Liverpool, Britain December 5, 2016. REUTERS/Peter Byrne/Pool
LONDON — Bank of England Governor Mark Carney thinks Britain is facing "the first lost decade since the 1860s" when "Karl Marx was scribbling in the British Library."
Carney said in a speech on Monday in Liverpool that stagnant wage and productivity growth means Brits are no better off today than they were prior to the onset of the financial crisis in 2008.
He added that, with Brexit looming, low real wage growth is set to continue: "The only question is how this comes about: either through a compression of nominal wage growth and higher unemployment, or through faster growth in consumer prices and a smaller rise in joblessness."
This wage stagnation, combined with income and wealth inequality, has led to a widespread backlash against free trade and globalisation.
Carney told the audience at the Liverpool John Moores University, "We meet today during the first lost decade since the 1860s. ... Rather than a new golden era, globalisation is associated with low wages, insecure employment, stateless corporations, and striking inequalities."
The shock election of Donald Trump as President of the United States has been interpreted by many commentators as a rejection of globalisation, with Trump campaigning to "Make America Great Again" and returning manufacturing jobs to the US.
Carney said central bankers and governments must do more to look after those who feel left behind by the forces of globalisation, saying: "The combination of open markets and technology means that returns in a globalised world amplifies the rewards of the superstar and the lucky. Now may be the time of the famous or fortunate, but what of the frustrated and frightened?"
As well as name-checking Karl Marx, one of the founders of communism, in his introduction, Carney also suggested a solution to the problems that he identified that could be seen as communist.
He appeared to reject the "trickle down" economic theory favoured by those on the right — saying "while trade makes countries better off, it does not raise all boats" — and called for at least some limited wealth redistribution.
Carney said: "For free trade to benefit all requires some redistribution." He called on politicians to develop a system of "inclusive growth where everyone has a stake in globalisation."
However, the governor added: "There are limits, of course, because of fiscal constraints at the macro level and the need to maintain incentives at the micro level. Fostering dependency on the state is no way to increase human agency, even though a safety net is needed to cushion shocks and smooth adjustment."
If the government, central banks, and private corporations do not make changes to adopt "inclusive growth," Carney warns: "Turning our backs on open markets would be a tragedy, but it is a possibility. It can only be averted by
confronting the underlying reasons for this risk upfront."
Some commentators have blamed low interest rates for rising inequality — savers can not make much return while a flood into things like property and stocks creates an asset price bubble that favours the well off, or so the theory goes.
The governor defended the Bank of England's monetary policy, saying the Bank's actions helped to avert an economic depression in the wake of the financial crisis.
But he said: "Long-run prosperity is not in the gift of central bankers. It depends on a much wider set of initiatives of our elected representatives, and ultimately, on the actions of the private sector."

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600