Wednesday, January 27, 2016

RBS is still a mess but it's better that taxpayers hold onto it for now

RBS is still a mess but it's better that taxpayers hold onto it for now

The Royal Bank of Scotland unleashed a horrendous market update – warning it would take a £2.5 billion ($3.6 billion) hit.
The bank is paying out on legal bills and extra provisions for misselling, writedowns on its private bank and make some huge changes to its pensions scheme.
The bad news is probably going to get even worse for RBS.
The bank's CEO, Ross Ewan, and CFO Ewan Stevenson made it clear on a call with press that "I wouldn't read anything into this statement that we are close to settling with US authorities."
In other words, none of this multi-billion pound provision covers the US authorities' potential charges so therefore there could be a another huge hit in the future.
S0, it makes more sense for taxpayers to hang onto the government-owned bank for longer.
All in all, the bank admitted on a conference call with journalists and analysts this morning that it will make a loss for 2015. RBS CEO Ross McEwan was also bedgrudgingly put on the spot by journalists to name the last time RBS made a full year profit and not a loss — he took a guess and said around six to seven years ago.
Around seven years ago, RBS had to beg the government for a bailout. Over 2008 and 2009 it borrowed £45.4 billion ($70.1 billion), worth 500p per share, from the taxpayer and it has yet to pay it back. The government originally owned 83% in the bank and it currently still owns 73% of RBS.
"I am determined to put the issues of the past behind us, and make sure RBS is a stronger, safer bank," said McEwan on the call. "We now have the financial strength to deal with this. We said 2015 and 2016 would tidying up these legacy issues."
The share price immediately tanked in the market open, although it has made a slight recovery to be only down around 1.5%. However, overall the stock is down over 32% this year. The share price is around 256.70p.
rbsjan1Google Finance
It is a distinct possibility that the share price could crater again, if RBS announces further provisions for litigation settlements that relate to the US authorities or even another scandal we haven't heard of as of yet.

The slower, underachieving cousin of Lloyds

RBS is on shaky ground, after all, it almost failed the Bank of England's 2015 stress tests.
It's hard not to compare RBS and other British bank Lloyds, making RBS being the slower and underachieving cousin.
The government was forced to pump £20.5 billion ($32 billion) into Lloyds at the height of the financial crisis in 2008 and 2009. Shares in the struggling lender were bought at an average price of 63.1 p when fees are factored in. The government is also going to sell a £2 billion ($3 billion) slice of its remaining 11.98% stake in the bank to retail investors in the spring.
Ross McEwanPeter Macdiarmid/Getty ImagesRoss McEwan, Chief Executive of RBS (Royal Bank of Scotland) speaks to reporters and investors on February 27, 2014 in London, England.
The seemingly speedy privatisation of Lloyds has made the public view RBS as a poisoned chalice and that we should offload it as soon as possible. This is a terrible idea.
Last summer, UK Chancellor George Osborne sold off a chunk of RBS shares for around 330p per share. He made a £1 billion loss and was heavily criticised by politicians and the public for bringing the taxpayer stake down to 73%.
The former shadow chancellor Chris Leslie said at the time “getting back the taxpayers’ money is not an impossible objective and the chancellor is dismissing this too lightly."
Despite pressure to move RBS back into the private sector, selling shares now would be the wrong move — especially if it hasn't solved its "legacy issues" around misselling mortgage backed securities. And as stated above — US authorities lawsuits regarding the same kind of products.
It also added an extra £500 million to pay for the mis-selling of payment protection insurance, bringing the bank's tota PPI provisions pot to £4.3 billion. PPI was misleadingly sold alongside loans, credit cards and mortgages, and banks have been forced to pay back customers who were wrongly persuaded to take the coverage.
The deadline for claims isn't until 2018. We have a long way to go. The PPI mis-selling scandal has now cost the banking industry around £26 billion ($40 billion) in compensation payments and admin fees and that number has risen with RBS' additional provision.
On top of that Joseph Dickerson, equity analyst at Jefferies said in a note this morning "the pension change was something new and unfriendly near-term."
Most importantly, Jefferies pointed out that it is best, for investors to "buy" the stock now, as once all the issues are somewhat sorted, the RBS target price is at 482.00p. This is way above Osborne's 330p sell-off and near to the original price taxpayers bailed out the bank at.
We've got a long way to go until RBS sorts itself out and until it can properly put to bed the myriad "legacy issues" there is no point in rushing a privatisation because the only people that will seriously lose out will be the taxpayer and the customers the bank serves.

APPLE DELIVERS DISAPPOINTING OUTLOOK, BLAMES GLOBAL ECONOMY - Jay Yarow

APPLE DELIVERS DISAPPOINTING OUTLOOK, BLAMES GLOBAL ECONOMY

Apple delivered its 2015 holiday-quarter earnings report on Tuesday afternoon.
There's only one thing you need to know about the report: It seems that the iPhone business has finally peaked.
Apple provided revenue guidance for the first three months of 2016 of $50 billion to $53 billion, which at its midpoint will be an 11% drop from that of the year before. Analysts were expecting $55.7 billion.
On the earnings call, one analyst said this revenue guidance implied the iPhone would be down 20% for the period.
Apple CEO Tim Cook said he didn't think iPhone sales would be down that much, but he confirmed that iPhone sales would most likely be negative for the first time ever in the quarter.
Investors weren't too freaked out by the news. Apple shares fell only about 2% on the news. This was, for the most part, expected. Analysts have been lowering their expectations for months.
The weak guidance wasn't the only disappointment from Apple.
Apple sold 74.8 million iPhones during the 2015 holiday period, which is up ever so slightly from same period in the prior year, when it sold 74.5 million iPhones. But it's slightly under expectations of 75 million.
Apple sold only 16.12 million iPads, a 21% drop. The Mac was down 3%.
Apple attributed its slowdown to the turbulent macroeconomic environment, saying weakness in oil-dependent economies like Russia, Brazil, and Canada was affecting its sales.
It also blamed a strong US dollar for soft sales growth. Revenue was up just 2%, but it says if the US dollar hadn't changed, then its revenue would be up 8%.
While it is mostly bad news, there is one major positive for Apple: It beat expectations on earnings per share, with record profits. It has $216 billion in cash, so it won't have to close up shop anytime soon.
But investors want growth from technology companies, and there will be no growth from Apple in the next three months.
Here are the numbers from Apple versus analyst expectations:
  • Q1 EPS: $3.28, up 7% year-over-year, versus expectations of $3.23
  • Q1 revenue: $75.9 billion, up 2% year-over-year, versus expectations of $76.6 billion
  • Gross margin: 40.1% versus expectations of 39.9%
  • iPhone unit sales: 74.8 million, flat year-over-year, versus expectations of 75 million
  • iPhone ASP: $690 versus $674 expected
  • iPad unit sales: 16.12 million, down 21% year-over-year, versus expectations of 17.3 million
  • Mac unit sales: 5.31 million, down 3% year-over-year, versus expectations of 5.8 million
  • Q2 revenue guidance: $50 billion to $53 billion versus expectations of $55.7 billion. At its midpoint of $51.5 billion, Apple revenue would be down 11% year-over-year.
Here is Apple's handy table of data:Apple Q1 2015 tableApple
Apple also included supplemental material to explain its results. As you can see here, it's blaming the strength of the US dollar for tough comparisons.Apple currencyApple
Apple included this table to show that if you look at currency on constant basis, things wouldn't be all that bad!Apple currency tableApple
Apple also broke out its services revenue to show how this part of its business is growing.Apple services revenueApple
Finally, Apple wants you to know that it has 1 billion active devices.Apple 1 billionApple

CHARTS:

Our charts from BI Intelligence on Apple's quarter.bii apple revenue by product stacked 4Q15BI Intelligence
bii apple revenue by product line 4Q15BI Intelligence
iphone sales chart q1 2016BI Intelligence
bii apple ipad unit sales yoy growthBI Intelligence
bii apple mac unit sales yoy growthBI Intelligence
bii apple ASP by iphone ipadBI Intelligence
bii apple product ASP YOY growthBI Intelligence
bii apple ASP by device_allBI Intelligence
bii apple earnings by region 4Q15 stackedBI Intelligence
bii apple earnings by region 4Q15 lineBI Intelligence
bii apple earnings share by region 4Q15 stackedBI Intelligence

LIVE BLOG OF THE EARNINGS CALL

Here we go. Call starting.
5:03: Tim Cook will start, then CFO Luca Maestri.
5:04: Tim Cook calls it a huge accomplishment given turbulent environment. Says we sold 74.8 million iPhones, an all time high, that's 34,000 iPhones an hour. Almost 50% than 2 years ago, more than 4X five years ago. Incredible number, speaks to popularity of iPhone and our ability to deliver in such a short period of time.
5:06: Major markets in Brazil, Russia, etc. have been hit by slowing economic conditions, commodity prices, and strong dollar. 2/3 of revenue outside US, so weakening currency matters. Says 8% would have been growth rate if not for currency fluctuations.
5:07: Conditions in China were a source of concern. We were seeing momentum in summer. In December best results ever. 17% y/y in constant currency, fueled by highest iPhone sales and record App Store. We saw softness in China, noticeably in Hong Kong. We remain confident about the long term potential.
5:09: We have invested during periods of weakness in the past and we plan to do the same.
5:10: Shipped iPad Pro which has been well received. Shipped new Apple TV. Had our best quarter by far for Apple TV sales. We expanded distribution of Apple Watch, as we expected, set a new quarterly record with especially strong sales in December.
5:11: Now over more than 5 million contactless payments in countries where Apple Pay is available today. Finally, we have 10 million paying subscribers for Apple Music.
5:12: We have the mother of all balance sheets with $216 billion.
Our customer satisfaction is second to none. Recent research shows a 99% customer satisfaction rate for iPhone 6 and 6 Plus. Our iPhone loyalty rate almost 2X as strong as next.
Because customers satisfied and engaged they purchase apps service and they are likely to buy another Apple device.
5:13: We have 1 billion devices installed. It's driving one of the largest services businesses in the world.
5:14: Luca Maestri taking over... talking about services revenue. Size and growth compare favorable to other services business. GM on a purchase volume basis are similar to our company average. 
5:17: We define an active base as one involved with our services in the past 90 days. We have world class skills in hardware, software, and services. iOS, MacOS, WatchOS, and TVOS.
5:18: Growth for quarter driven by iPhone, Apple Watch, Apple TV, and services. Did this despite weakness of foreign currency. We achieved 14% revenue growth in Greater China. Emerging markets was strong overall. 
5:19: Sold 74.8 million iPhones. Grew 76% in India. Sales were up 20% in many western European countries. 
5:20: We exited quarter about low end of our target range of iPhone channel inventory.
5:21: Mac declined, but had PC market share gains. We were happy with 27% y/y Mac sales growth in mainland China. 
5:22: Sold 16.1 million iPads, exited in range of channel inventory. In segment of tablet market we compete, we are successful.
5:24: App Store revenue up 27%, App Store customers up 18%.
5:25: $215.7 billion in cash and marketable securities. Returned $9 billion to investors. We have done $110 billion in share repurchases over all, we plan to update our cash plan soon. We plan to be active in debt markets. 
5:27: We have a wider range than normal because of the volatility in the markets. We think our margins are "extremely strong".
We don't provide guidance beyond the quarter, how ever we think March is the most difficult year-over-year compare.
QUESTIONS TIME!
5:28: Goldman analyst says what's up with double digit drop in your forecast?
5:28: Luca: in constant currency, when you look at March , revenue would be down 5-10%, a 400 basis point impact. In addition to strong year ago quarter, there is number of things. Macro environment is weakening, when you think about the commodity driven economies -- Russia, Brazil, Canada -- clearly economy is weaker than a year ago. Our response to FX has been to increase price, which has protected margins, but inevitably higher prices affect demand.
5:31: Munster asks about iPhone ...
Tim Cook: Most important is the product. We were blown away by Android switchers last quarter, highest by far. The emerging markets broader than BRIC when I look at our share, I see huge opportunities. In terms of upgrade it will be meaningful as customers get into a different pattern. My own sense would be the other items I mentioned would be important.
In terms of virtual reality ... I don't think it's a niche, I think it's really cool and has some interesting applications.
5:33: Question on iPhone prices...
Luca: We couldn't be happier with iPhone ASP. FX impact was $49. The mix of products was very strong. Great reception for new iPhones. Overall when you look at outcome, it was very very strong. We feel good about that.
On channel inventory, we entered below target. We exited at the low end of the 5-7 weeks. Exited quarter on iPad and Mac well within the ranges we wanted to have.
5:35: What is driving growth in op ex.
Luca: That is the ranking, starts always with tooling and manufacturing equipment that is up a bit y/y. Then we have data centers, that's a growing expense, install base is growing and data center is for the services. And our new campus.
5:36: On iPhones, a 15-20% decline suggested by guidance, which suggests decline overall for fiscal 2016. Is that because smartphone market won't grow or Apple reaching saturation? What's going on here...
5:37: Tim Cook: We do think Apple units will decline in the quarter, but not to the levels you are talking about. At this point we see that Q2 is the toughest compare because the year ago quarter had catch up in it from Q1 if you recall we were heavily supply constrained, plus we are in an environment that is dramatically different. The overall melees in virtually every country in the world.
The market itself, we don't spend a lot of time on predicting. Our view is that if we make a great product we can get people to move over. The metrics I see would suggest otherwise (in terms of saturation). In China, 50% of sales were to first time buyers.
5:41: Luca: Added page 3 to explain a couple of steps. Of the services we report, is directly tied to the install base. Small portion related to when we sell a device like Apple Care. We are showing that install base driven, there is a part where we recognize revenue... We grew channel inventory by 3.3 million units, remember were were below our target range.
5:43: Leverage within the model ... some pressures how do you think about spending RG&A, SG&A.
Tim Cook: On R&D invest without pause. We have some great things in the pipeline. In terms of SG&A, we seek to throttle expenditures with exception of where investing in new stores. For instance, expansion plans in China have not changed. Continuing to invest in places where we think for the long term, like India.
We do believe this too shall pass and that these countries will be great places and we want to serve customers in there so we are not retrenching. We will continue investing. The downside of economic stress is that some asset prices get cheaper, so I think this is the period you want to invest.
5:48: Next leg of growth in China? Where do we see it? Where do you see India in next 2-3 years?
Tim Cook: In terms of China, LTE penetration was in the mid 20s. I've talked about this before, but easy to lose perspective, the middle class was less than 50 million in 2010, bu 2020 it should be half billion. This is an enormous opportunity. The demographics are great. We are continuing on distribution. We are crafting our products and services with China in mind. We don't subscribe to the doom and gloom predictions.
India is incredibly exciting. Growth is very good. Fastest growing BRIC country. Third largest smartphone. Population is very young. I see demographics being great for a consumer brand and people that want the best products. India revenue up 38%. Currency issues in India.
5:51: Question on iPhone ...
5:52: People that have not upgraded to iPhone 6 is 60%. 40% have, 60% have not. Is there some compare issue that people went to get an iPhone 6/6+... no doubt we had an unbelievable quarter last year. No doubt however I think you can tell from numbers on currency side.
5:54: Overarching message about services? Is this to reinforce power of platform? Or stepping stone to much more? Could we see you in cloud services?
Tim Cook: We started breaking out services start of fiscal 15. As it's grown, investors and analysts wanted more visibility we broke it out to show size, scope, growth and profitability, I do think the assets we have are huge, I do think that it's something the investment community should focus. In terms of plans, I wouldn't want to comment, but we wouldn't break it out if it wasn't important.
5:57: With macro situation changing, some CEOs change go to market strategy, will Apple's strategy change?
Tim Cook: Our strategy is always to make the best products. We are able to provide several price points. I don't see us deviating from that approach. We design to a certain price point. We make it priced at a great value.
And we're all done!
More: Apple Earnings

Putin's top security adviser says U.S. is after Russia's minerals

Putin's top security adviser says U.S. is after Russia's minerals

Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev (L) looks at President Vladimir Putin during a meeting with the BRICS countries' senior officials in charge of security matters at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, May 26, 2015. REUTERS/Sergei KarpukhinThomson ReutersRussian Security Council Secretary Patrushev and President Putin attend a meeting with the BRICS countries' senior officials in Moscow
MOSCOW (Reuters) - The head of Russia's Security Council said in a newspaper interview published on Tuesday that the United States wanted a weakened Russia so as to gain access to its vast mineral resources.
The attack on the United States by Nikolai Patrushev came against a background of anti-Western rhetoric by Moscow following imposition of sanctions by Washington and the European Union over Moscow's role in Ukraine's crisis.
In an interview with BBC Panorama aired on Monday night, Adam Szubin, acting U.S. Treasury secretary for terrorism and financial crimes, accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of amassing secret wealth by corrupt practices over "many, many years".
"The United States' leadership has set a goal of global dominance," Patrushev, a former head of Russia's FSB state security service and a long-standing ally of Putin, told the Moskovsky Komsomolets newspaper in an interview on its website.
"They don't need a strong Russia. On the contrary, they need to weaken our country as much as possible. To achieve this goal, the Russian Federation's disintegration is not ruled out as well," Patrushev said.
"This will open access to the richest resources for the United States, which believes that Russia possesses them undeservingly."
Russia is the world's sixth-largest holder of crude oil resources and its natural gas reserves are the second biggest, marginally lower than those of Iran, according to BP data, one of the most respected in the industry.
Patrushev repeated Moscow's concern that NATO's expansion represents a threat to Russia's national security.
(Reporting by Vladimir Soldatkin; Editing by Richard Balmforth)
Read the original article on Reuters. Copyright 2016. Follow Reuters on Twitter.

RAY DALIO: The 75-year debt supercycle is coming to an end

RAY DALIO: The 75-year debt supercycle is coming to an end

ray dalioLarry Busacca/GettyRay Dalio.
When Ray Dalio talks, people tend to listen.
Dalio is one of the most successful hedge fund managers of all time, founder of the $82 billion (£57.1 billion) Bridgewater Pure Alpha fund.
He's worried that one of the fixed constants of economics — the ability of central banks to stimulate economic growth through lowering the cost of debt — is coming to an end.
In an op-ed article for the Financial Times published this week, Dalio said (emphasis ours):
We are seven years into the expansion phase of the business/short-term debt cycle — which typically lasts about eight to 10 years — and near the end of the expansion phase of a long-term debt cycle, which typically lasts about 50 to 75 years.
What I am contending is that there are limits to spending growth financed by a combination of debt and money. When these limits are reached, it marks the end of the upward phase of the long-term debt cycle. In 1935, this scenario was dubbed "pushing on a string."
Dalio says risk premia — the return of risky assets such as bonds compared with cash — are at historically low levels.
This makes it harder for central banks to keep pushing up the prices of these assets with loose monetary policy, such as low interest rates and quantitative easing, because there is less incentive, or yield, to compensate investors for taking the risk on debt.
Here's Dalio again:
As a result, it is difficult to push the prices of these assets up and it is easy to have them fall. And when they fall, there is a negative impact on economic growth.
When this configuration exists — and it is also the case that debt and debt service costs are high in relation to income, so that debt levels cannot be increased without reducing spending — stimulating demand is more difficult, and restraining demand is easier, than is normally the case.
This debt fatigue could go some way to explaining why central banks are still locked into near-zero interest rates, seven years after the financial crisis that prompted their fall. In this scenario too, central banks would be powerless to stop the next financial crisis or recession with inflationary tactics.
But, worryingly, central banks would be powerless to stop the next financial crisis or recession with inflationary tactics in Dalio's scenario.
Dalio made the comments in the Financial Times in the week LCH Investments crowned him as the most successful hedge fund manager ever, dethroning George Soros.
Dalio's $82 billion (£57.1 billion) Bridgewater Pure Alpha fund generated $3.3 billion (£2.3 billion) in net gains for investors in 2015, according to the report. The fund, founded in 1975, has made $45 billion (£31.3 billion) in profit over its lifetime. Soros' Quantum Endowment Fund, which began in 1972, has made $42.8 billion (£29.8 billion).

It's been another tumultuous session for China's stock market

It's been another tumultuous session for China's stock market

China Wingsuit FlyingREUTERS/China DailyA contestant flies during a World Wingsuit Championship at Tianmen Mountain near Zhangjiajie, Hunan province, October 17, 2012.
Fresh from plunging 6.4% on Tuesday, it’s been another tumultuous session for Chinese stocks on Wednesday.
After tumbling more than 4% midway through the session, taking its losses over the past two sessions to more than 10%, the benchmark Shanghai Composite rocketed higher in late trade, eventually closing the session with a modest decline of 0.5%.
The sudden and dramatic rebound, led by large-cap stocks, had all the hallmarks of intervention from China’s so-called “National Team”, a group of state-backed financial institutions entrusted with stabilising markets during times of significant market losses.
The 1-minute tick chart below, supplied by Thomson Reuters, reveals the scale of the rebound seen in late trade.
Like the Composite, all other mainland indices finished well off their intrasession lows. The best performer was the SSE 50 – that encompassing the largest listed firms by market capitalisation in Shanghai – which closed with a gain of 0.12%.
The decline in Chinese stocks corresponded with the news that Chinese industrial profitscontinued to slide in December, continuing the trend seen in the prior six months.
Despite the falls in China, most other indices across the region posted healthy gains.
The Nikkei 225 in Tokyo was the standout performer, rallying 2.72%. There were also solid gains for stocks in South Korea, Singapore and Hong Kong.
The one exception to the rule was Australia’s ASX 200 which closed with a decline of 1.20%. While it traded in negative territory for the majority of the session, it closed when Chinese markets were down by more than 4%, helping to explain the significant underperformance.
Here’s the current Asia scoreboard as at 6.15pm AEDT.
Stocks
  • ASX 200 4946.44 , -60.12 , -1.20%
  • Nikkei 225 17163.92 , 455.02 , 2.72%
  • Shanghai Composite 2736.13 , -13.65 , -0.50%
  • Hang Seng 19086.96 , 226.16 , 1.20%
  • KOSPI 1897.87 , 26.18 , 1.40%
  • Straits Times 2561.60 , 15.99 , 0.63%
  • S&P 500 Futures 1888.75 , -7.25 , -0.38%
Forex
  • USD/JPY 118.3 , -0.11 , -0.09%
  • USD/CNH 6.6101 , 0.0015 , 0.02%
  • AUD/USD 0.7030 , 0.0028 , 0.40%
  • NZD/USD 0.6477 , -0.0020 , -0.31%
  • AUD/JPY 83.16 , 0.25 , 0.30%
  • EUR/USD 1.0862 , -0.0007 , -0.06%
  • GBP/USD 1.4328 , -0.0022 , -0.15%
  • USD INDEX 99.042 , -0.3180 , -0.32%
Commodities
  • Gold $1,118.70 , -$1.47 , -0.13%
  • Silver $14.45 , -$0.05 , -0.32%
  • WTI Futures $30.88 , -$0.57 , -1.81%
  • Copper Futures ¥35,660 , ¥670 1.91%
  • Iron Ore Futures ¥322.00 , ¥7.00 , 2.22%
10-Year Bond Yields
  • Australia 2.692%
  • New Zealand 3.280%
  • Japan 0.213%
  • Germany 0.438%
  • UK 1.694%
  • US 1.998%

Here's what to expect from Wednesday's Fed meeting

Here's what to expect from Wednesday's Fed meeting

janet yellenMark Wilson/Getty ImagesFederal Reserve Chairman Janet Yellen testifies before a Joint Economic Committee hearing on Capitol Hill, December 3, 2015 in Washington, DC
Losses in global stock markets and continued declines in oil prices to start the year put more importance on the January FOMC meeting than usual.
The “off-cycle” FOMC meetings (January, April, July and October) contain neither a scheduled press conference nor an update of the Fed’s economic forecasts and FOMC participants’ viewpoints as to the path of Fed policy and economic outcomes. As such, market expectations for any signaling of policy change coming around these meetings is usually small.
Furthermore, coming off of the highly anticipated “lift-off” meeting of December of last year that provided a long anticipated change in policy direction, bond market participants hold little expectation for any follow-up policy move in January. Instead, the market expects any policy action at the earliest in March. However, with this year’s rocky start, we are keeping a close eye on what the Fed will say this week, and see three potential scenarios for the central bank’s response:
1. The “Thread the Needle” outcome, which is probably idealized from the Fed’s perspective. In this scenario, the Fed both acknowledges the impact of recent declining oil prices on the near term inflationary outlook, along with the impact of financial market conditions, in a manner that assures investors that they are paying attention to market events without overreacting to them. Ideally for the Fed, a muted financial market response results from the balance between these two extremes.
2. The Fed replays its September 2015 FOMC statement reaction to market concerns, returning to something of the language used then that “recent global economic and financial developments may restrain economic activity somewhat and are likely to put further downward pressure on inflation in the near term.” The intent in September was to reassure markets that the Fed was paying attention to the implications of financial market developments. A recognition this time would be similarly motivated. Coming so soon however after announcing “lift-off” we doubt the Fed takes this course of action. Further arguing against this course of action is that the Fed may well remember that these attempts at reassuring the market of its monitoring of developments backfired and heightened financial market uncertainty.
3. The Fed downplays recent market volatility and re-emphasizes the conditions and outlook for policy rate normalization. That would be reminiscent of the October 2015 FOMC Statement last year. With some stabilization in markets, the Fed surprisingly quickly excised its concerns for “recent global economic and financial developments” and their ability to “restrain economic activity” and instead characterized the outlook for economic activity and the labor market as “nearly balanced but is monitoring global economic and financial developments.” In that case, the market reaction was both higher interest rates and continued increases in stock prices.
In contrast to the month of stability in financial markets last October, the Fed has seen only two days of “stability” late last week. That might argue against this scenario for reiterating the normalization, making this scenario less clear cut.
Clearly the first option is the preferable one. Whether the Fed can deliver it remains in doubt, and that likely won’t resolve the doubts hanging over financial markets this week either.
Read the original article on The BlackRock Blog. Copyright 2016. Follow The BlackRock Blog on Twitter.

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600