Sunday, January 24, 2016

'Unicorns' may be mauled by bear market

'Unicorns' may be mauled by bear market

[WASHINGTON] After a year in which free-flowing capital fueled unprecedented growth in so-called tech "unicorns," the sector is bracing for a slowdown which could thin the herd.
Unicorns - a term coined for the usually rare billion-dollar, privately funded startups - have been proliferating in the United States, China and elsewhere as venture capital investors bet on the next Google or Facebook.
But the prospect of a "bear market" where prices are falling, combined with other factors, could send unicorns running for cover, observers who follow the sector say.
Some warnings have already appeared.
Advertisement
Venture-backed startups globally saw a 30 percent drop in funding in the fourth quarter to $27.2 billion, according to a survey by KPMG and research firm CB Insights.
A separate survey by 451 Research found more than half of tech investment bankers predict venture funding will tighten in 2016 compared to last year, the most bearish outlook since the 2008-2009 recession.
Some unicorns have seen their value slashed by investors aiming to put a fair market evaluation on their holdings. Mutual fund company Fidelity last year marked down the value of its Snapchat holdings by 25 percent.
In this scenario, cash-hungry unicorns are likely to face a harder time getting fresh capital, said David Erickson, a senior fellow at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School and former Wall Street banker who led technology share offerings.
The weak stock market could impact private firms, potentially forcing a delay of initial public offerings (IPOs). If they need to raise cash, it will likely be "down rounds" with a lower valuation than prior funding efforts.
"Valuations will typically come down," he said.
Since the "softness might be prolonged, venture capital firms will be focused on protecting the value in their existing investments rather than spending too much time investing in new names." Erickson said there are some similarities to the tech bubble of 1999-2000, even if the new firms have more developed business models.
"While the companies are more seasoned, the issue similar to 2000 is that many are burning tons of cash," he said.
"If they need to have enough cash to break even and if they can't access capital either through the public markets or private markets, then they face more difficult decisions." Erickson added that "we are not quite at that dire stage now," but that if capital dries up it may mean that promising startups would either need to sell themselves or "hit the wall." The unicorn population - estimated by Forbes this month at 173 companies worth a collective $585 billion - is still alive, but some are hurting.
CB Insights chief executive Anand Sanwal said he expects to see "some wounded unicorns" but that there is still capital available from private equity and corporate venture funds.
"Some of those companies that got ahead of themselves on valuation are going to have difficult conversations. You can't just keep selling your dream and your business model can't be raising venture capital." Charlie O'Donnell at Brooklyn Bridge Ventures said many of the unicorns are likely to face a "down round" if they need new capital, because investors are more cautious.
"It's not that they're concerned that the world will implode and that startups won't still be a good bet over the long term," O'Donnell said in a blog post. "They're just.... busy taking care of their wounded." A report by KPMG and research firm CB Insights found that 2015 was a blockbuster year for startup venture funding despite a cooling in the fourth quarter.
For the year, the report found $128 billion in venture funding for startups, up 44 percent from 2014. The number of funding rounds was more than 7,800.
But it noted that some companies which went public "fell short of recent private valuations, no doubt rattling VC (venture capital) investor confidence." The most prominent in the group was mobile payments startup Square, led by Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey. Square debuted with a market value of just over $4 billion - well below the $6 billion value assigned by private investors in its latest funding round. Square's value has since fallen to less than $3.4 billion.
Most stock markets are in a "correction," which means a drop of 10 percent from their peak.
Some Asian bourses however are in "bear" territory, with a drop of 20 percent or more, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq has neared that level.
Unicorns, say analysts, may not fare well if the bears come out in force.
"If indeed venture firms start keeping their money in their own bank accounts - rather than investing it in entrepreneurs - that could well put startups under pressure, resulting in slower growth rates and lower valuations for those that survive tighter times as well as dramatic flameouts for those that don't," wrote 451 Research analyst Brenon Daly in a blog.
Daly said the message has not yet reached the unicorns.
"Most money-burning startups continue to run their businesses as if there's an inexhaustible supply of money," he said.
"But at some point this year, startups will almost certainly have to make different decisions than they've made up to now."
AFP

Toshiba to sell part of its chip operations: sources

Toshiba to sell part of its chip operations: sources

[TOKYO] Japan's Toshiba Corp plans to sell part of its chip business as it aims to recover from a $1.3 billion accounting scandal, three people familiar with the matter told Reuters on Saturday.
The electronics conglomerate has started accepting bids, with early interest shown by the Development Bank of Japan Inc, said the sources, who declined to be identified because they are not authorised to talk to the media.
The state-owned bank has already invested in Seiko Holdings Corp's semiconductor operations.
The sale would exclude Toshiba's mainstay NAND flash memory operations, according to two people with direct knowledge of the matter and one person familiar with the discussions.
Advertisement
On the block are businesses that handle system LSI and discrete chips, which are widely used in cars, home appliances and industrial machinery. The loss-making operations posted sales of 330 billion yen ($2.78 billion) in the year ended March 2015.
A Toshiba spokesman told Reuters the company hasn't made a decision yet on the sale of its chip operations, while a spokeswoman at the Development Bank of Japan declined to comment.
Following the accounting scandal, Toshiba has been focusing on nuclear and other energy operations, as well as its storage business, which centres on NAND flash memory chips used in smart phones.
The Tokyo-based company, which is selling off non-core chip operations, plans to invest heavily in its flash memory production capacity in Japan to better compete with South Korea's Samsung Electronics Co Ltd.
REUTERS

Japan Inc may win Sharp battle, but lose the LCD war

Japan Inc may win Sharp battle, but lose the LCD war

[TOKYO] A state-backed Japanese fund is frontrunner to rescue Sharp Corp, ahead of a rival approach from Apple supplier Foxconn, but industry insiders question whether it can protect the group in the long term amid cut-throat competition.
Innovation Network Corporation of Japan (INCJ), if successful, would represent the third bailout in as many years for Sharp, known for its liquid crystal display (LCD) technology and super-thin screens.
The INCJ is keen to keep it in domestic hands, and plans to merge it eventually with state-owned rival Japan Display.
Industry experts and some policy advisers are beginning to question whether "old-school" government intervention can help Sharp's LCD business survive, as competition from Korean and Chinese rivals ratchets up. "Rather than cutting away the dysfunctional groups, this is about combining the weak part," said William Saito, an entrepreneur and special adviser to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's cabinet office.
Advertisement
Sharp's main advantage in LCDs is its IGZO technology, which allows for high definition and thin, touch-screen displays that consume less power than conventional screens.
That has failed to shield it from pricing pressure, and weak finances have prevented it from investing in new technologies even as rivals experiment in newer screen innovations.
Japan Display, formed in a government-backed deal in 2012 from parts of Sony, Toshiba and Hitachi Ltd, was previously seen as a weaker rival.
But it is now doing better, thanks to orders from Apple and Chinese smartphone makers for its "in-cell" screens, which are easier to assemble than other types of high-end LCD screens.
Both Japanese manufacturers face strong competition from Samsung and LG Display, which have been working on OLED (organic light-emitting diode) screens that do not require backlights and can therefore be thinner or curved.
In the end, analysts say the ability to quickly ramp up capacity will matter as much as, if not more than superior display technology, giving an edge to Samsung and well-funded Chinese players like BOE.
Japan has had some success with government-led rescues in the past; Renesas Electronics, saved by INCJ in 2013, has turned around.
Renesas specialises in automobile-related semiconductors which are increasingly in demand for newer features such as assisted parking. But the world of LCD is far more cut-throat. "Its investment in Renesas has been a relative success story," said Andrew Daniels, a Tokyo-based managing director at Indus Capital. "But make no mistake ... LCD is a market that doesn't have that underlying stability that Renesas has in automotive semiconductors." In the end, however, it will be a political decision, analysts and political sources say.
Sharp's troubles come as Japan's technology industry has struggled against more nimble Asian rivals, with brands that were once household names, such as Sony, losing cachet among global consumers.
Though he won't stand in the way of a foreign buyer, Abe's office would prefer to see Sharp rescued by a Japanese deal.
INCJ is also considering merging Sharp's home appliances business with that of Toshiba Corp, which is eager to bolster its finances in the wake of an accounting scandal. "In the end, they are trying to saving face for Japan. It's politically motivated," said Saito, the entrepreneur and government adviser.
Media reports put the INCJ offer at 300 billion yen ($2.6 billion), and sources say that bailout would also involve Sharp's lenders offering at least 200 billion yen, by converting debt to equity.
The Wall Street Journal on Thursday reported that Hon Hai, also known as Foxconn, was offering 625 billion yen and promising not to replace top management at Sharp, an apparent attempt to soothe nationalist concerns.
REUTERS

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600