Monday, January 11, 2016

JPMorgan: Potential capital outflows from China have become "practically boundless"

JPMorgan: Potential capital outflows from China have become "practically boundless"

[NEW YORK] China has seen nearly US$1 trillion in capital leave the nation since the second quarter of 2014, and according to analysts at JPMorgan Chase & Co, the sky's the limit for outflows going forward.
The causes of these massive capital outflows, which have prompted the People's Bank of China to tap the country's war chest of reserves to support the currency, have grown more numerous in the second half of 2015, argues a team led by managing director Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou. Amid the broadening of sources of downward pressure on the yuan, however, a major factor that may have restrained the central bank from devaluing the currency in a big way has vanished.
"The Chinese capital outflow picture appears to have entered a new phase in (the third quarter), broadening to include foreign direct investment and portfolio instruments, something that could make future capital outflows practically boundless," writes the JPM team.
Net foreign direct investment in China rose by US$7 billion in the third quarter, its lowest level since 2000, with gross inflows falling precipitously compared to the second quarter. Meanwhile, foreign investors divested a net US$17 billion worth of Chinese stocks and bonds over that same span.
The stock of foreign ownership of these two categories totals over US$3.6 trillion as of the third quarter of 2015, according to JPMorgan's calculations.
JPMorgan Chief China Economiost Zhu Haibin had previously observed that Chinese corporates' attempts to reduce US dollar liabilities at a time in which softness in the yuan was in the offing was a major source of capital outflows. Foreign currency loans outstanding amounted to almost $400 billion at the end of the third quarter-on the face of it, there is plenty of room for Chinese firms to continue to dial down this exposure. But Chinese corporates have also been working to reduce asset- liability mismatches by piling up more foreign assets along with paying back foreign currency debt.
"While the accumulation of foreign currency or dollar deposits represents a capital outflow and thus puts downward pressure on the Chinese currency versus foreign currencies, it also increases the share of foreign currency debt that is hedged," JPM's team explains. "The implication is that, of the US$387 billion stock of foreign currency loans, only a small portion is unhedged and thus vulnerable to further unwinding, especially after taking into account (the fourth quarter) which likely saw further progress towards hedging foreign currency debt."
If the depreciation of the yuan thus far has been limited by concern it would exacerbate Corporate China's balance sheet woes, then worries on this front ought to subside.
The upshot of this, according to JPM, is that "the low overall net foreign exchange exposure by Chinese corporates and banks removes one hurdle in terms of Chinese authorities allowing a larger and faster depreciation from here."
For the People's Bank of China, selling off some of its reserves is not a wholly negative event in and of itself. But as a sizeable portion of this war chest could be earmarked for other purposes, Beijing's ability to defend its currency may be more limited than commonly appreciated, as Reuters' Eric Burroughs notes.
"The Swiss cheese-like capital account and now onshore demand for dollars is putting pressure on foreign exchange reserves that make one think that this big insurance policy on future capital opening up may not be enough," he wrote.
"Suddenly US$1.8 trillion of reserves doesn't sound like a lot in an economy still capable of seeing US$150 billion or so of outflows in a given month and accounting for the usual import coverage needs."
On a day when interbank rates in Hong Kong spiked amid suspected support of the offshore yuan by Chinese policymakers, it's increasingly reasonable to question whether Beijing can manage its economic transition gracefully, or if unintended negative consequences stemming from policy errors will dominate the scene.
BLOOMBERG

Eurozone economic growth stable, China stabilising: OECD

Eurozone economic growth stable, China stabilising: OECD

[PARIS] Economic conditions are stabilising in China and the outlook is for steady growth in the eurozone, while the US and UK economies are losing steam, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development said on Monday.
The Paris-based OECD said that its monthly leading economic indicator, supposed to capture economic turning points, showed signs of stabilisation in both China and Brazil.
"In the United Kingdom and the United States, the CLIs (Composite Leading Indicators) point to easing growth, albeit from relative high levels," it said in a statement.
"Amongst the major emerging economies, the CLIs for China and Brazil confirm the tentative signs of stabilisation flagged in last month's assessment," it said. "In Russia, the CLI anticipates growth losing momentum while the CLI for India signals firming growth."
On an index where 100 represents the long-term average, the OECD said the euro zone economy remained at 100.6 in its latest review of conditions, with Italy and France healthily above the benchmark at 100.9.
The US reading edged lower, to 99.1 from 99.2, while the UK reading dipped to 99.1 from 99.3.
China stood at 98.4, up from 98.3 in the previous month's report. Brazil's reading rose to 99.5 from 99.3 while Russia went from 99.6 to 99.4.
REUTERS

China central bank to push forward relending pilot scheme

China central bank to push forward relending pilot scheme

[BEIJING] China's central bank said on Monday it will push forward a pilot scheme on relending in a bid to support the country's farming sector and small and micro companies.
The scheme, which allows banks to refinance high quality credit assets rated by the central bank, was first introduced in Guangdong and Shandong provinces in 2014.
The People's Bank of China relent 4.97 billion yuan to 31 institutions from the start of the program through to the end of 2015.
REUTERS

Chinese group Wanda says revenue surged in 2015

Chinese group Wanda says revenue surged in 2015

Wang Jianlin,  chairman of property giant Wanda Group, is known outside China for a string of overseas acquisitions© AFP/File STRWang Jianlin, chairman of property giant Wanda Group, is known outside China for a string of overseas acquisitions
Shanghai (AFP) - Chinese conglomerate Wanda Group, owned by the country's richest man, said revenue surged nearly 20 percent in 2015, despite worsening economic conditions in its home market. 
Wanda, founded by Wang Jianlin, has its origins in commercial property but is diversifying into areas ranging from entertainment to e-commerce. 
Reports say the company might soon take a stake in US film studio Legendary and Wanda is scheduled to hold a news conference in Beijing on Tuesday regarding an overseas acquisition.
The company said revenue was 290.16 billion yuan ($44 billion) last year, up 19.1 percent from 2014, according to a statement released late Sunday. It gave no specific figure for net profit though it forecast a rise.
The parent group is not listed but some of its subsidiaries are quoted.
Wang is known outside China for a string of overseas acquisitions including the organiser of Ironman extreme endurance contests and Swiss sports marketing group Infront, while it also has a stake in Spanish football club Atletico Madrid.
He burst into the international spotlight in 2012 by buying US cinema chain AMC Entertainment for $2.6 billion and his company owns more than 200 malls, shopping complexes and luxury hotels across China.
The firm's cinema unit recorded a 49.9 percent year-on-year surge in revenue last year to 8.0 billion yuan, the statement said. Wanda Cinema Line, which holds an estimated 14.5 percent share of the Chinese box office, now has 292 cinemas.
The personal fortune of Wang, who is also chairman of Wanda, stood at $32.4 billion as of Friday, according to Bloomberg Billionaires. 
China logged its worst economic performance since the global financial crisis during the July-September quarter, with gross domestic product rising just 6.9 percent -- its lowest level in six years -- and hitting several companies' bottom lines.
More: AFP

SHELL BOSS: The oil slump won't last

SHELL BOSS: The oil slump won't last

bullwrestlingReutersShell CEO Ben van Beurden is bullish on oil.
The CEO of Shell has made a pretty bullish call on the price of oil just weeks before the company tries to complete its merger with BG Group in one of the biggest oil deals in history.
Speaking with the Sunday Timesahead of a vote by shareholders on the proposed $51 billion (£35 billion) deal, Ben van Beurden said that he couldn't see today's oil prices lasting and that he reckoned things would pick up in the coming years (emphasis ours):
"The oil prices we are seeing today are not sustainable and are going to settle at higher levels," he said, "and higher, in my mind, over the next few decades than the low $60s that we require to make this deal a good deal."
This month could see Shell's merger with BG Group finally go through as shareholders in both companies will be given the chance to have their say. The deal has already cleared all of the major hurdles when it comes to regulation, getting approval from Chinese authorities in mid-December.
Shell really needs to see a big rise in the price of oil, however, for its acquisition of BG to make any financial sense. When the potential merger was first announced in April, oil cost about $50 (£34.41) a barrel, which, while still a big slump from the $105 (£72.25) highs of summer 2014, is still nearly 35% higher than prices right now.
Last week the price of oil slipped to 14-year lows, with Brent crude losing 10% of its value in just a week. The slide has continued Monday, and both major benchmarks saw losses of at least 2% falls in early trade.West Texas Intermediate crude is hovering just below $33 (£22.71) a barrel, while Brent crude is just above that mark.
Now that all the regulatory fences have been cleared, shareholders in the oil giants will get to have their say on the deal with votes set for January 27 and 28. Opinion within the companies, and in the world of finance, is split massively. David Cumming, the head of equities at Standard Life, one of Shell's top investors, has publicly said the company will not back the merger, calling the deal "value destructive." But others — including the influential advisers ISS and Glass Lewis — have encouraged investors to approve the acquisition.

Betting against the consensus

In the run-up to trying to gain shareholder approval for one of the highest-profile takeovers in recent years, Shell's CEO is likely to do everything he can to convince people it's a good deal, but van Beurden's comments are interesting nonetheless. Especially when you consider that so many people are betting that oil will continue its downward slide.
oil long termInvesting.comThe price of oil has hardly stopped falling for a year and a half, and people expect the slide to continue.
Shell's finance director, Simon Henry, acknowledged last week that he feared oil would fall below $20 (£13.76), something echoed in a note from Morgan Stanley on Monday morningsuggesting that Brent crude could fall to $20 a barrel thanks to the strong dollar, as first reported by Bloomberg. "Given the continued US dollar appreciation, $20-$25 (£13.76-17.20) oil price scenarios are possible simply due to currency," analysts working on the note said.
It's not just his colleagues and Morgan Stanley whom van Beurden is arguing against either. In November, Goldman Sachs suggested $20 oil could soon be a reality, and this was back when WTI was worth more than $45 (£31) a barrel.
Van Beurden's bullishness doesn't seem to have affected investors too much on Monday. At the time this article was first published, Shell's A shares are up by 0.2%, while BG's have fallen a little under 1% on the day.
More: Oil Shell BG Group

Oil is diving

Oil is diving

Oil is tumbling once again as the market rout which kicked off 2016 looks set to continue into a second week.
First thing on Monday, both major oil benchmarks dropped by more than 2%, but recovered recovered a little by around 9:00 a.m. GMT (4:00 a.m. ET) hovering at losses of around 1.4%, with Brent slightly over, and US crude slightly under.
Both benchmarks are now back close to their early losses, with the American benchmark, West Texas Intermediate crude slipping 1.8% as of 10:40 a.m. GMT (5:40 a.m. ET). European, or Brent, crude has slipped by 2.1% on the day, with the cost per barrel at $33.22 (£22.80).
Here's how Brent crude looks like this morning:
Screen Shot 2016 01 11 at 10.47.31Investing.com
And this is what WTI is doing:
Screen Shot 2016 01 11 at 10.47.54Investing.com
Oil's continued fall looks to be partly thanks to the continuing slump in the Chinese stock markets. Last week, Chinese equities bounced all over the place, spending a lot of time in the red, and twice triggering the country's so-called "circuit-breaker" — a measure put in place to temporarily shut the markets if prices fall too far.
Authorities then decided to stop using the measure, after fears that it was making the market rout even worse.
At the close in China, two of the country's biggest indexes, the CSI 300, and the China A50, saw big drops. The CSI closed down by just north of 5%, while the A50, dropped by 4%.
Add to this continuing tensions in the Middle East, and its no surprise that the second week of trading in 2016 has started just as badly as the first.
More: Oil Markets China

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600