Monday, January 4, 2016

Puerto Rico governor on default: 'We ran out of cash'

Puerto Rico governor on default: 'We ran out of cash'

[WASHINGTON] Puerto Rico's governor called for Congress to help it address its heavy debts, saying the island would default on some payments Monday as it no longer has the money to pay.
Speaking on CNBC television, Alejandro Garcia Padilla, governor of the US island territory struggling with US$70 billion in debt, defended his decision last week to miss about US$37 million in payments at the deadline at midnight Monday.
While the territory will still pay most of the total US$1 billion due to creditors late Monday, including the largest chunk on its direct government-issued bonds, the debt issued by two small state-controlled entities will fall into arrears, he confirmed.
"We ran out of cash," he said. "It's very simple. We don't have money to pay." Garcia Padilla said last week that the government was already diverting money committed for some bond payments to ensure it could pay salaries and pensions and its senior state debt.
He said that diversion also amounted to defaulting on its obligations, and that he was expecting the territory's government to be hit with litigation after the payment deadline passes late Monday.
"It will be very costly, that litigation," he told CNBC.
"It will cost a lot for the commonwealth. It will cost a lot for our creditors, and every dollar that I need to use to pay lawsuit lawyers will be a dollar that I will not have available to pay creditors."
Garcia Padilla last week blasted "hedge and vulture fund" creditors for blocking the restructuring of the island's debt, and says he needs legislation proposed in Congress that would allow the Caribbean island to declare bankruptcy and force a debt restructuring.
"We do not want a bailout, we just want the tools to solve this crisis," he told CNBC on Monday.
Meanwhile credit rating agency Standard & Poor's said Monday that it would not cut its rating for Puerto Rico based on the expected payment defaults.
The rating had been lowered in September to CC, with a negative outlook, indicating strong expectations of a default.
But S&P said Monday that Puerto Rico had made strong efforts to ensure it pays its direct "general obligation" (GO) debt and to negotiate with creditors, so that the very small payments to be missed would not merit a downgrade.
The government's selective move "shows Puerto Rico's reluctance to default on GO debt where bondholders hold a particularly strong legal claim."
The move instead "could represent a shot across the bow to bondholders in ongoing restructuring talks, as well as serve as a signal to Congress that help is needed."
AFP

Hedge fund views cheap Carlyle stock a 'no-brainer' bargain

Hedge fund views cheap Carlyle stock a 'no-brainer' bargain

[NEW YORK] A little-known hedge fund has emerged as Carlyle Group LP's biggest outside shareholder after seizing on a sell-off of the US private equity firm's stock as a "no-brainer" buying opportunity.
New York-based Okumus Fund Management Ltd is so convinced that Carlyle has been unfairly discounted by investors that it bought US$110 million worth of Carlyle shares in December - an 8.8 per cent stake that accounts for a fifth of its US$550 million fund.
By Okumus' estimate, Carlyle's stock, which nosedived about 43 per cent last year in its worst annual performance since its 2012 listing, could be undervalued by as much as 50 per cent.
"It's a no-brainer," said Ahmet Okumus, chief executive officer of the fund. "It's a good business that generates a lot of free cash flow."
Founded in 1987 by William Conway, David D'Aniello and David Rubenstein, Washington DC-based Carlyle is one of the world's largest alternative asset managers with US$188 billion worth of assets under management.
Like other alternative asset manager stocks, Carlyle has been hammered in recent months by a stock market rout, plunging oil prices that have depressed its energy investments, and investor fears that a wobbly credit market could undermine buyout deals.
But Carlyle's stock has been especially hard hit as investors punished it for its loss-making hedge fund unit Claren Road Asset Management, and its troubled buyout of Symantec Corp unit Veritas.
Financial markets were stunned in November when banks failed to drum up investor interest in US$5.6 billion worth of loans and bonds for Veritas, which Carlyle agreed to buy for US$8 billion in August in the biggest buyout deal for 2015. As such, the closing of the deal has been pushed back to Jan 29 from Jan 1.
Yet Okumus believes investors are judging Carlyle too harshly. The banks - not Carlyle - are on the hook for any unsold Veritas debt, Ahmet Okumus said.
Any risk to Carlyle's business from choppy markets should also be priced in at the current share price level, he said. "If you look at Carlyle's returns, they've been around for 30 years. They've invested in much more difficult markets than this, and they've done well."
According to Okumus' calculation, investors pay 6.6 times for each dollar of Carlyle's projected 2016 earnings - defined as economic net income. That is cheaper than some of its peers, including Blackstone Group LP's 9.6 times, but pricier than KKR & Co LP's 6 times.
Carlyle declined to comment when asked about Okumus'investment.
REUTERS

World's five richest lose US$8.7b in year's trading debut

World's five richest lose US$8.7b in year's trading debut

[NEW YORK] The world's five richest people lost US$8.7 billion on Monday in a global stock selloff sparked by weak factory data in China and a flareup in tensions between Saudi Arabia and Iran.
Amazon.com Inc founder Jeff Bezos led decliners on the Bloomberg Billionaires Index in the first trading day of 2016, losing US$3.7 billion as the world's largest online retailer fell 5.8 per cent. His net worth is now US$56 billion.
Spain's Amancio Ortega dropped US$2.5 billion to US$70.4 billion as his Inditex SA, the biggest fashion retailer, fell 3.5 per cent. 
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Chief Executive Officer Warren Buffett, Mexico's Carlos Slim and Microsoft Corp co-founder Bill Gates, the richest person on the planet, lost a combined US$2.5 billion.
BLOOMBERG

Chinese turmoil boosts US dollar, hits smaller currencies

Chinese turmoil boosts US dollar, hits smaller currencies

[NEW YORK] More evidence of the sharp slowdown in China's huge economy Monday battered emerging currencies while giving solid boosts to the US dollar and Japan's yen.
The sudden breakdown in relations between Gulf rivals Saudi Arabia and Iran, over Riyadh's execution of a Tehran-supported Shi'ite cleric, also added to market nervousness and the flood into the greenback.
The dollar added 0.3 per cent on the euro, to US$1.0833 per euro, but slipped 0.7 per cent to 119.42 yen.
The greenback surged 1.3 per cent to US$0.7184 per Australian dollar, the latter hit by the threat China's continued slowdown poses for Australia's key ore exports.
The British pound also gave up ground, to US$1.4721.
Among emerging currencies, China's yuan took another fall, losing 0.4 per cent to 6.54 per dollar, a nearly four-year low.
Brazil's real plummeted 2.0 per cent to 4.05 per US dollar, its lowest level since October, amid worries that China's weakness also spells lower demand for Brazil's already hard-hit commodity exports.
"The proximate cause for the carnage was weaker-than-anticipated manufacturing PMI figures" for China, said Matt Weller of Forex.com in a client note.
However, he argued, "while traders remain uneasy about China, the broader outlook for emerging markets is more optimistic (or at least less pessimistic)."
AFP

Fossil Free (Video)



Fossil Free

 

Fossil Free
Impassioned climate change activists all over the world may have a new and entirely unexpected ally in their cause: the financial sector. On the heels of the recent climate change talks in Paris, groups of concerned citizens have gathered their resources to place pressure on wealthy institutions who invest in the fossil fuel industry. The new documentary Fossil Free chronicles their mission.
From The Netherlands to New York, their movement is beginning to gain momentum. Their collective efforts are aimed at various organizations across the globe who invest in gas, coal and oil companies, including universities, banks, governments and large-scale investment firms. Their argument? The money you invest serves as a reflection of your personal values. Calling upon their view of fossil fuel industries as the major contributors to an unsustainable environment, these activists implore divestment as a means of restoring faith and reputation with the public.
The film contains portraits of those who are working diligently to propel this grassroots movement. Many of them are young, and they view themselves as the last generation who can truly make a difference in curbing the climate change epidemic. They're determined to pick up the slack from an older generation who remains apathetic to these pressing issues.
In Berlin, a young woman works to secure time with a top-ranking government official to discuss the city's continued investment in fossil fuels. In New York, an innovative online platform called 350.org works to mobilize and concentrate the movement's efforts on the global stage. In Amsterdam, activists work to convince one of the most significant investment firms in the region to remove these companies from their portfolios.
Surprisingly, several investment firms have proven receptive to the persuasions of the movement, though their reasoning often falls on financial risk rather than the ethical considerations. From their perspective, the fossil fuel industries are overpriced assets, and increasingly precarious propositions for the potential investor.
The climate change movement is multi-faceted, and victories can be won on many sides if we remain fully engaged in the issue. Fossil Free is a valuable examination of one such effort to contain this growing crisis.

PwC says economic impact from December's UK storms could top US$4b

PwC says economic impact from December's UK storms could top US$4b

[LONDON] Consultancy PwC raised its estimate of the economic impact of the three storms that battered Britain in December to between 2-2.8 billion pounds (US$2.96-4.14 billion) on Monday, and warned losses could climb further, with scores of flood alerts still in place.
Raising its estimates for the third time in a week, PwC said Storms Desmond, Eva and Frank, which have caused widespread flooding and damage to thousands of homes and businesses across northern parts of the British Isles, could incur combined insured losses of between 1-1.4 billion pounds (US$1.48-$2.07 billion).
"December was an awful time for the UK. The three storms - Desmond, Eva and Frank - plus the additional rainfall that has fallen between and after each of the storms has resulted in the worst damage in the UK since the 2007 storms," Mohammad Khan, general insurance leader at PwC said. "It may well be that as more rain falls we could even have more damage than the 2007 storms".
Floods and storms in 2007, which hit north-east, central and southern England and Wales, cost insurers a total of 3 billion pounds according to the Association of British Insurers.
Last Wednesday, PwC estimated insured losses from UK Storms Desmond and Eva of between 900 million pounds to 1.2 billion pounds, raising an earlier estimated range of 700 million-1 billion pounds.
The estimates published on Monday are the first to include the impact of Storm Frank.
REUTERS

A more challenging political landscape

A more challenging political landscape

Parliament will reconvene on Jan 15 amid a difficult period of economic transition and restructuring despite a stronger mandate for the ruling party

Singapore
THE year which has just passed will go down in history as the one when the People's Action Party (PAP) stamped its dominance in Singa- pore's political scene anew with some gusto.
A little over four years after the ruling party collected just 60.1 per cent of the popular vote - its lowest vote share since Independence - at the May 2011 General Election (GE), the PAP bounced back in style.
Even the party's top leadership admitted they were surprised by the landslide victory after Polling Day on Sept 11. The final figure - 69.9 per cent - was far higher than many had predicted.
But in retrospect, the signs for a big win had long been on the cards.
For one thing, the country was in the midst of a year-long celebration of its Golden Jubilee, as one feel-good event after another was held to mark 50 years of nation-building in 2015, among them a grand National Day Parade at the Padang on Aug 9.
The death of founding prime minister Lee Kuan Yew, at the age of 91 on March 23 after a long battle with pneumonia, produced a tremendous outpouring of grief as thousands upon thousands of Singaporeans turned up, rain or shine, to pay their last respects.
His demise, in many ways, also reminded this tiny city-state of how much it had achieved in just five decades, thanks largely to the contributions of the pioneer generation of leaders.
Both the SG50 celebrations and Mr Lee's passing stirred a level of patriotism and nationalistic fervour never before seen in Singapore. At the same time, the government had moved to address the thorny issues of housing, transport and immigration since 2011. All these tipped the scales in the PAP's favour at the polls.
Still, when Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong finally ended months of speculation by calling for an early general election in September, many political observers and analysts were of the view that the opposition would end up making further inroads.
Instead, it was the PAP that managed to scupper the opposition's plans. The ruling party won 83 out of 89 available seats in Singapore's 13th Parliament, reclaiming the Punggol East single-seat constituency from the Workers' Party (WP), and narrowly lost in Aljunied GRC (group representation constituency) only after a dramatic recount of the ballots.
As PM Lee, the PAP's secretary-general, said on Dec 6 as he delivered an early post-mortem of the results, the "solid victory" assured Singaporeans of at least another decade of predictability, political stability and good governance.
The strong performance at the polls also paved the way for Singapore to complete the "crucial transition" from Singaporeans and leaders who experienced 1965 and the country's transition to Independence to a completely post-Independence generation, he told activists at the PAP Convention.
For the crucial task of leadership transition, the last two GEs have given Mr Lee the vital opportunity to assemble a new team of leaders with enough time for them to gel and take over the reins well before the election after next.
As for the opposition, it is now back to the drawing board as the various parties try to figure out how things went so pear-shaped after the build-up to GE2015 had promised them so much.
The WP now finds itself with one less elected Member of Parliament after Lee Li Lian's unsuccessful bid to retain her Punggol East ward. The incumbents in Aljunied and Hougang must also come to terms with the fact that they were re-elected with reduced margins.
The other parties are also busy taking stock of their heavy defeats. The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) was favoured to win at least one constituency, but the Chee Soon Juan-led party did not even get close in any of the areas they contested.
All eyes will now be on two upcoming major events in Parliament.
The first session of the 13th Parliament is scheduled for the afternoon of Jan 15, which will start with the election of the Speaker and the swearing-in of the MPs. About a quarter of the new House's members are new.
Later that day, President Tony Tan Keng Yam will deliver his opening address in Parliament in which he will set out the priorities, policies and programmes of the government for its fresh five-year term. MPs will then debate the President's Address over five days from Jan 25 to 29.
Parliament reconvenes amid a difficult period of economic transition and restructuring in Singapore. One of the key challenges for the government is how to cushion the impact of slower growth in a very volatile and uncertain global economy.
The second opportunity for parliamentarians (especially the newbies) to make an early impression will be in the two-week Committee of Supply debate in April, after Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat delivers his first Budget on March 24.
Last February, Mr Heng's predecessor Tharman Shanmugaratnam announced Singapore's largest Budget - total expenditure for the 2015/16 Financial Year was estimated at S$68.2 billion - as the government took significant strides towards achieving its goal of building a more inclusive society.
Looking forward, it is even more imperative that Singapore gets its politics right and acts as one united people, if it wants to keep succeeding in the next 50 years. This was, in fact, one of the main messages Mr Lee put forward during the hustings last year.
"The world is changing. Singapore is changing. Our politics will have to change . . . But we have to work together even if we have to work harder to have a national consensus," he said at the PAP's lunchtime rally at UOB Plaza on Sept 8. "So when we move forward, we move as one people, and we get there as one united people.
"

S'pore risks fading into investment backwater as market cap shrinks

S'pore risks fading into investment backwater as market cap shrinks

Analysts cite evaporating liquidity, decreasing depth and dearth of fund-raising

Singapore
FRESH off its worst year for listings in at least two decades, the Singapore stock market now faces the threat of fading into an irrelevant backwater for global investors as large privatisations, small floats and a broad-based equities slump continue to erode its market value and appeal, market watchers warn. 
With the number of initial public offerings (IPOs) here falling in 2015 to its lowest annual level since the Singapore Exchange (SGX) opened its doors in late 1999, the local share market has been left in the dust by regional rival Hong Kong as of late, while its neighbours in South-east Asia have begun to nip at its heels.
One crucial and worrying sign is that the sharp slide in Singapore's total market capitalisation in 2015 reflects evaporating liquidity, decreasing depth and a sore lack of interest in raising funds here as attention turns to markets with brighter prospects, analysts and asset managers say, adding that this trend could well turn into a vicious cycle.
The total market value of stocks listed on the Singapore Exchange added up to about US$463.46 billion at the close of trading on Dec 31, 2015, going by a Bloomberg gauge based on actively traded primary securities and stripping out exchange traded funds and ADRs (American depositary receipts).
This number would make the entire Singapore market cap smaller than that of Nasdaq-listed Apple, which weighed in at around US$586.86 billion at the end of last week. It also marks the Singapore market cap's lowest level since hitting US$464.41 billion at the end of 2011.
Singapore's market cap shrank a sharp US$107.18 billion or 18.8 per cent from a year ago, according to Bloomberg data. The bulk of the drop was due to a broad-based equities slump that also put a dent in other bourses across Asia. The Straits Times Index fell 14 per cent in 2015 to finish the year at 2,882.73 points, down from 3,365.15 at the end of the previous year.
But another significant factor is a handful of big delistings that has occurred alongside a persistent dearth of sizeable initial public offerings (IPOs), analysts say.
"Privatisations of many large companies in the last few years, especially in the property sector, have shrunk the investable pool of stocks in Singapore," said Kum Soek Ching, head of Southeast Asia research at Credit Suisse Private Banking Asia Pacific.
"The absence of large and meaningful IPOs in recent years have also not been supportive to the total market cap of Singapore ... With less market participants, a smaller-cap market can suffer from liquidity issue during periods of stress."
Large delistings in 2015 included that of conglomerate Keppel Corp's property arm Keppel Land in July. KepLand had a market value of S$6.56 billion, based on 1.55 billion shares outstanding and the takeover price of S$4.38 per share that KepCorp paid.
Engineering firm UE E&C, which was worth S$337.5 million based on an offer price of S$1.25 for 270 million shares, was taken over by a private equity firm and delisted in March. Bookstore chain Popular Holdings also delisted in May. It had had a market value of around S$255.07 million, based on offer price of S$0.32 and about 797.09 million shares outstanding.
The declining total market cap points to an increasing lack of interest from companies in tapping equity capital markets here.
Against the market values of the delistings last year, there was just S$339.18 million in total IPO fund- raisings in 2015. All but one of the 13 public floats here last year were Catalist listings, and the average IPO size worked out to around a puny S$26 million.
The number of IPOs and the total IPO funds raised last year were the smallest in at least two decades, going by newspaper reports. Up until 2015, the SGX had not seen fewer than 20 public floats a year. In the depths of the global financial crisis, the year 2008 had 22 IPOs raising US$931 million while 2009 had 23 floats that raised about S$3.21 billion, according to media reports then. Even in 1998, with the Asian financial crisis, SGX managed to rake in 20 IPOs that raised about S$406 million.
Several Singapore-based companies are also eschewing a local listing for an overseas float. Aircraft leasing firm BOC Aviation said last year that it wanted to list in Hong Kong. A Singapore medical company that develops treatments for Alzheimer's also said recently that it was gunning for a Nasdaq IPO, according to media reports.
The recent trend of substantial privatisations and tiny IPOs could continue to reduce Singapore's market cap this year, which market watchers say does not bode well for local stocks' investment appeal.
"Investors, especially foreign institutions, like liquid markets, and market liquidity correlates with market size. Institutional investors take a silo approach and allocate to illiquid private equity and liquid listed equity, where they seek and expect liquidity," said Bryan Goh, chief investment officer at wealth manager Bordier.
Dealmakers have already hinted that they expect 2016 to be characterised by Catalist IPOs, and a couple of large delistings are already on the cards. French shipping firm CMA CGM is trying to privatise Neptune Orient Lines (NOL), which had a market cap of S$3.2 billion at end-2015. Singapore Airlines is also trying to delist Tiger Airways, which had a market cap of around S$1.03 billion as at Dec 31.
Ms Kum added that the size of a market's total capitalisation would determine its weighting in indices such as the MSCI that institutional investors use as benchmarks. "A market with a small weighting may become irrelevant for institutional investors, unless it has a very compelling story.
"With a lower index weighting, the Singapore market risks losing its relevance and importance to institutional investors. Private investors may also increasingly need to avail themselves of more investable options in overseas markets, in order to preserve or grow their wealth, creating a vicious cycle in diminishing the market size and relevance."
According to Bloomberg data, Hong Kong had a total market cap of US$4.105 trillion at end-2015, nearly nine times that of Singapore. It also eclipsed Singapore in terms of IPO fund-raising last year, raising more than 160 times the total figure in the Republic. Japan's market cap is nearly 11 times that of Singapore and the US is nearly 51 times as large.
To makes matters gloomier, other countries in South-east Asia, which have so far remained smaller than Singapore in terms of total market value, are beginning to catch up.
The gap between Singapore's and Malaysia's market cap was US$117.98 billion in 2014; that shrank 27 per cent to US$86.35 billion in 2015. For Indonesia, the gap with Singapore narrowed 24 per cent from US$148.68 billion to US$113.34 billion, while the gap between Singapore and Thailand was reduced by 16 per cent from US$154.85 billion to US$130.53 billion over the same timeframe.
IG market strategist Bernard Aw noted: "We are always in competition with other bourses, and failing to increase or retain investors' interest is akin to a kiss of death. This is why Singapore is trying to attract investors' interest back via initiatives such as the introduction of new equity indices which are sector-specific."
However, some market watchers said there were still things to like about the Singapore stock market.
"Singapore does not necessarily lose its shine as an investment destination as a result of its market cap declining or being relatively smaller than that of other global financial hubs," said Andrew Wood, head of Asia country risk at BMI Research.
"It is really the quality of the firms listed in that market as well, the maturity of the financial markets framework, along with other factors such as the political risk and macroeconomic risk environment in that country. Singapore scores very well for the last three criteria."
Though he cautioned that Singapore "could lose out if it is seen as a less attractive environment for IPOs, and a shrinking market cap could speak to a relatively shallower capital market", Mr Wood said Singapore could still remain attractive for investors due to its regulatory environment and its macroeconomic and political stability.
Hugh Young, Asia managing director of Aberdeen Asset Management, also remained optimistic. Though he noted that "the reality is that for many of the world's largest investors, Singapore is a backwater given its size and relative lack of liquidity", he said market size should not matter for "true investors looking for great investments".
"Of course for the more thorough investor, small markets and small companies can be a profitable hunting ground as they can be overlooked and neglected ... All in all, it's not something I would overly worry about although for many it can be a matter of pride - 'we're better because we're bigger'. Size is not everything."

China could 'spook' markets again in 2016, IMF's Obstfeld warns

China could 'spook' markets again in 2016, IMF's Obstfeld warns

[WASHINGTON] China could once again "spook" global financial markets in 2016, the IMF's chief economist warned.
Global spillovers from China's slowdown have been "much larger than we could have anticipated," affecting the global economy through reduced imports and weaker demand for commodities, IMF Economic Counselor Maurice Obstfeld said in an interview posted on the fund's website.
After a year in which China's efforts to contain a stock- market plunge and make its exchange rate more market-based roiled markets, the health of the world's second-biggest economy will again be a key issue to watch in 2016, Obstfeld said.
"Growth below the authorities' official targets could again spook global financial markets," he said as global equities on Monday got off to a rough start to the year. "Serious challenges to restructuring remain in terms of state-owned enterprise balance-sheet weaknesses, the financial markets, and the general flexibility and rationality of resource allocation."
Mr Obstfeld, who took over as chief economist at the International Monetary Fund in September, said emerging markets will also be "center stage" this year. Currency depreciation has "proved so far to be an extremely useful buffer for a range of economic shocks," he said.
"Sharp further falls in commodity prices, including energy, however, would lead to even more problems for exporters, including sharper currency depreciations that potentially trigger still-hidden balance sheet vulnerabilities or spark inflation," he said.
With emerging-market risks rising, it will be critical for the US Federal Reserve to manage interest-rate increases after lifting its benchmark rate in December for the first time since 2006, Mr Obstfeld said.
BLOOMBERG

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600