Sunday, August 9, 2015

China's much-hyped healthcare reform drive stuck in first gear

China's much-hyped healthcare reform drive stuck in first gear   


[BEIJING] Li Tiantian, a Chinese doctor turned tech entrepreneur, is a leading light of the country's much-trumpeted healthcare reform drive. His medical networking platform DXY.com links two million doctors across China and has attracted funding from tech giants like Tencent.
DXY is exactly what Beijing has said it's looking to support after it pinpointed remote healthcare, Internet and technology as drivers to solve its healthcare woes in a five-year roadmap in March.
The reality is rather different: DXY is curbing plans to work with public hospitals to help connect doctors and patients online because of a lack of support by Beijing and obstacles working with China's huge, fragmented public healthcare sector.
"We've heard a lot of good stories from the top - Internet +, driving force, policy changing - but see nothing happen at the bottom," Mr Li told Reuters. "It's not about market, capital or even tech - these things are already developed very well ... rather it's the regulations, laws and systems of support." Mr Li's position reflects wider obstacles to healthcare reforms in technology, online drug sales, hospital privatisation and doctors' pay, drivers that are a major lure for investors and firms betting billions of dollars on China opening up a market set to be worth around US$1.3 trillion by 2020.



"Always ask: is there actually a macro tailwind, and is the government and regulatory environment - which is very important in China - supportive of this?" said Alexander Ng, associate principal at McKinsey & Co. "If there's a lot of negative voices it might make investors back off or calculate a much higher risk premium."
China has ramped up its healthcare reform rhetoric, touting greater access for foreign investors to healthcare services, a bigger role for technology and pushing drug sales from mostly state-run hospitals towards the retail market.
This has helped draw in close to US$30 billion worth of healthcare merger and acquisition investment so far this year, a fivefold leap from the same period in 2014, according to Reuters data. Healthcare M&A already leapt last year.
But, despite the government's longer-term ambitions, industry insiders say reforms are being held up because of technical issues such as crumbling and fragmented IT systems to in-fighting between regulators and push-back from the state-run firms who dominate the sector - and don't want change. "With so many vested interests - dealers, hospitals, insurance departments and others - reform is not very fast,"said Frank Zhao, chief financial officer at China Jo Jo Drugstores.
Privately, some health policy advisers admit reforms are falling behind, while the public line is that reform has "hit up against the Yangtze River", a reference to the obstacle famously overcome by Mao Zedong's Communist forces in 1949.
The healthcare ministry did not respond to faxed queries seeking comment for this article.
Mr Zhao points to the expected approval for online prescription drug sales, which he and other industry insiders say has been delayed this year due to regulatory concerns and opposition from state-run hospitals and distributors.
These hold-ups are a frustration for pharmacy chains like Jo Jo as it looks to increase its business online, but also for tech giants like Alibaba Group Holding Ltd, which wants to get into the online prescription drug space.
One big draw for investors has been China's privatisation drive of healthcare services - touted as key to revamping an unpopular healthcare system, blighted by crowded hospitals, corruption and simmering tension between patients and staff.
But, despite the fast growth of private investment in hospitals, the public sector still dominates around 90 per cent of all patient visits, according to a Deutsche Bank 2015 healthcare report. Investors cite issues with insurance schemes, access to Chinese doctors and a still tightly-controlled market. "With things still not market-led, organizations like ours are facing huge challenges and difficulties," Hu Lan, president and director of hospital investment firm AMCARE Corporation, said at a conference in Shanghai in June.
Healthcare spending as a slice of China's GDP also remains small at around six per cent in 2013 compared to 17 per cent in the United States, World Health Organization (WHO) data show.
Reforms to reduce hospitals' reliance on drug sales also faces a revolt from doctors who argue this will take away a key revenue stream at a time when medical staff are overworked, underpaid and often violently abused by angry patients. "Every few days you hear about a doctor being beaten or even killed. This situation is a huge mental burden for doctors,"said Wu Xiaobo a doctor at the Wangjing Hospital in Beijing in a recent viral video campaign for doctors' rights.
As for DXY's Mr Li, his firm now plans to change tack and set up an offline clinic in the eastern city of Hangzhou this year to pilot potential healthcare reforms - outside the state sector. "We were hoping we could leverage changing policy and do something on mobile and digital," Mr Li said. "We found it's just too slow, so the only way to do it is out on our own."
REUTERS

China's falling exports put Aussie, Kiwi dollars on back foot

China's falling exports put Aussie, Kiwi dollars on back foot


[TOKYO] The currencies of Australia and New Zealand retreated following gains of at least one per cent on Friday, after disappointing trade data in China deepened concern that demand for commodities will weaken in their biggest export market.
The South Pacific nations' dollars had the steepest declines among major currencies against the greenback on Monday, after reports in China over the weekend showed exports shrank five times more than economists estimated and producer prices fell by the most in almost six years. The Aussie and kiwi had dropped last month as commodities plunged and bets increased that the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates.
"The worsening Chinese trade balance poses a risk to resource currencies," Toshiya Yamauchi, a senior analyst in Tokyo at Ueda Harlow, a margin-trading services provider, wrote in a note to clients. "China's data boost expectations for more easing while raising concerns about Chinese stocks and resource-linked currencies due to slackening demand."
Australia's dollar declined 0.3 per cent to 73.98 US cents as of 9.06 am in Tokyo on Monday. The currency rallied 1.5 per cent last week after hitting a six-year low of 72.35 on July 31. New Zealand's currency fell 0.2 per cent to 66.11 US cents, after advancing 1.1 per cent on Friday.

The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index was little changed at 1,212.59 after a report on Friday showed the world's largest economy added more than 200,000 jobs for a third month and the unemployment rate remained at a seven-year low.
BLOOMBERG

Quantitative easing with Chinese characteristics takes shape

Quantitative easing with Chinese characteristics takes shape 


[BEIJING] China's leaders are increasingly relying on the central bank to help implement government programmes aimed at shoring up growth, in an adaptation of the quantitative easing policies executed by counterparts abroad.
Rather than bankroll projects directly, the People's Bank of China is pumping funds into state lenders known as policy banks to finance government-backed programmes. Instead of buying shares to prop up a faltering stock market, it's aiding a government fund that's seeking to stabilise prices. And instead of purchasing municipal bonds in the market, it's accepting such notes as collateral and encouraging banks to buy the debt.
QE - a monetary policy tool first deployed in modern times by Japan a decade and a half ago and since adopted by the US and Europe - is being echoed in China as Premier Li Keqiang seeks to cushion a slowdown without full-blooded monetary easing that would risk spurring yet another debt surge. While the official line is a firm "no" to Federal Reserve-style QE, the PBOC is using its balance sheet as a backstop rather than a checkbook in efforts to target stimulus toward the real economy.
"It's Chinese-style quantitative easing," said Shen Jianguang, chief Asia economist at Mizuho Securities Asia in Hong Kong. "But it's not a direct central bank asset-purchase plan. China's easing is indirect and more subtle compared with the US or Japan." Weekend data underscored the need for policy support. Producer price deflation deepened last month while consumer inflation remains about half the central bank's target of three per cent for this year. Exports declined more than economists expected in July, hobbled by a strong yuan and lower demand from the European Union.



While there's been no public unveiling of the strategy, China's leaders are putting in place plans for the central bank to finance, indirectly, a fiscal stimulus program to put a floor under the nation's slowdown. China will sell "special" financial bonds worth trillions of yuan to fund construction projects, and the PBOC will provide funds to state banks to buy the bonds, people familiar with the matter said this month.
China Development Bank and the Agricultural Development Bank of China - known as policy banks because they carry out government objectives - will issue bonds, people told Bloomberg earlier. The Postal Savings Bank of China will buy the debt, aided by liquidity from the central bank, according to one of the people.
It's unclear whether by taking on bonds as collateral and delivering cash in return the PBOC's official balance sheet will expand. In the US, the euro region and Japan, central banks have bought securities outright in secondary markets, making the quantitative easing transparent on their books.
By contrast, China's current leaders, who took power in 2012, are opting for indirect financing - a strategy that also prevents the central government's debt burden from rising. A record credit expansion unleashed in 2008 during the global crisis is seen as having left the economy with excessive borrowing that's now being restructured.
A lot of the credit growth unleashed ended up being spent on already existing assets, meaning it didn't directly add to gross domestic product. After wrestling with that problem since about 2012, the central bank is stepping up ways to target credit so it's steered toward newly produced goods and services, said Simon Cox, Asia-Pacific investment strategist at BNY Mellon Investment Management in Hong Kong.
"China is trying to channel the lending towards something that will have more stimulative oomph," Mr Cox said. "If that happens to be a public good that is in short supply, then that's great, but first and foremost, let's get it into the real economy."
The PBOC still has more options that the Fed or Bank of Japan, which adopted unconventional easing when interest rates were close to zero. China's one-year benchmark lending rate is 4.85 per cent, and the required reserve ratio for the biggest banks remains at 18.5 per cent, among the world's highest even after a series of reductions.
In its second quarter monetary policy report published on Friday, the PBOC reiterated it would stick to a "prudent" policy stance and use "various monetary policy tools" to manage liquidity and credit.
"China is not in a crisis mode, and it's not necessary for the central bank to intervene too much," said Li Wei, China economist for Commonwealth Bank of Australia in Sydney. "By definition, China has not started QE as the PBOC's balance sheet isn't expanding." China's government under Li has repeatedly said it wouldn't opt for a big stimulus plan and would keep a "prudent" monetary policy stance. Still, Mr Li is seeking to shore up growth amid fresh signs the economy is lagging the official target of about seven per cent for this year.
"It's not an all-out QE as the Fed's was, but there are increasing signs of a QE program," said Chen Xingdong, chief China economist and head of macro-economics research at BNP Paribas SA in Beijing. Mr Chen said the PBOC was now opening the door to borrowers, but hasn't reached the stage of "forcefully flooding the market with money."
BLOOMBERG

Jubilant celebrations for Singapore's 50th National Day

Jubilant celebrations for Singapore's 50th National Day


SINGAPOREANS from all walks of life united in a boisterous celebration on Sunday to mark the 50th anniversary of Singapore's independence with the nation's grandest National Day Parade yet. Returning to the Padang this year - a site of deep historic significance as the venue for Singapore's first National Day Parade in 1966 - the parade drew some 26,000 people who were seated at the Padang and over 200,000 more around the Marina Bay downtown area.
Foreign dignitaries such as Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, Cambodia Prime Minister Hun Sen and New Zealand Prime Minister John Key flew in specially for the occasion to celebrate alongside local members of parliament, political office holders and cabinet ministers.
Parade spectators sang, clapped and cheered through 2.5 hours of rousing performances of National Day tunes by homegrown crooners Dick Lee, JJ Lin, Kit Chan, Stefanie Sun and Corrine May, and spectacular aerial fly-pasts by Republic of Singapore Air Force (RSAF) personnel, including a special "Five Stars" tribute by the Black Knights to the late founding prime minister of Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew.
Another first for this year was a special nostalgia-themed vintage parade segment that featured over 450 participants from different sectors that contributed to the early growth of the nation, such as pioneers from the Singapore Armed Forces' veterans league as well as veterans from the Singapore Civil Defence Force, the Singapore Police Force, and POSB Bank, each one clad in uniforms from decades past.

The festivities were capped by the biggest pyrotechnics display ever to light up the Singapore skyline, consisting of never-before-seen fireworks such as a 300m long rainbow arc and fireworks in the shape of orchid flowers, a smiley face, a heart shape, the crescent moon and stars, and a continuous blast of fireworks lasting 4-5 minutes as a grand finale.

Saturday, August 8, 2015

Australia probes hundreds of home purchases by foreigners

Australia probes hundreds of home purchases by foreigners


[SYDNEY] Australia is cracking down on foreigners who unlawfully own residential properties, investigating hundreds of cases ahead of the introduction of tougher penalties, Treasurer Joe Hockey said on Saturday.
The government announced in May it would increase penalties for illegal purchases to rigorously enforce rules under which foreigners are only allowed to buy new dwellings, and not existing residential property.
Mr Hockey said he had ordered the sale of six properties illegally owned by foreigners who had so far come forward on their own, but officials were working on hundreds more cases.
"Through the information provided by the public together with our own inquiries, we now have 462 cases under investigation for breaches of the law by foreign nationals in the purchase of residential real estate," he said.



"I expect more divestment orders will be announced in the not-too-distant future," he told a press conference in Sydney.
Australian real estate prices, particularly in Sydney and Melbourne, have soared in recent years, with concerns growing that cashed-up foreigners, particularly from China, have helped inflate the market.
Mr Hockey said the majority of cases being investigated came from New South Wales and Victoria, the states of which Sydney and Melbourne are the respective capitals, as well as Western Australia.
"There is significant foreign investment in residential real estate. It has certainly increased over the last few years," the minister said.
"Australia wants foreign investment, we need foreign investment, but we need to make sure that foreign investors comply with the laws." Mr Hockey said he would introduce legislation into parliament in the coming weeks to ensure that the reporting requirements, enforcement and penalty regimes for foreign investors who broke the rules were tougher.
As already announced, foreigners who illegally buy Australian real estate will face up to three years in jail or fines of Aus$127,500 (S$130,958) for individuals and Aus$637,500 for companies.
In relation to civil penalties, investors will lose whichever is the greatest of the capital gain made on the property, 25 per cent of the purchase price or 25 per cent of its market value.
AFP

728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600