Friday, February 13, 2015

Greece – and Spain – put Merkel in a no-win situation



EURO ZONE

Greece – and Spain – put Merkel in a no-win situation




The Greek quandary has put Germany into a no-win situation.
If Germany gives into the anti-austerity demands of Greece’s new Syriza government, the decision will embolden other anti-austerity movements in Europe, notably in Spain, where a Syriza-lookalike party, Podemos, is coming on strong.
If Germany gives Syriza nothing, Greece could well be forced out of the euro zone, wrecking the notion touted by the European Central Bank that the euro is “irreversible” and unleashing a bout of contagion that could send the euro zone back into recession.

MORE RELATED TO THIS STORY




The strong support within Greece for Syriza – including a big pro-Syriza rally in central Athens Friday night – must be giving German Chancellor Angela Merkel a nightmare. It is signalling that voters don’t want Syriza to back down in the fight with Germany and its pro-austerity allies.
On Sunday, Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras was defiant: Greece’s bailout program, which expires on Feb. 28, will not be extended.
“The bailout has failed,” he told parliament. “The Greek people gave a strong and clear mandate to immediately end austerity and change policies.”
Greece’s potential exit – Grexit – rocked the markets again on Monday. The main European stock indexes fell and Greek banks dropped by 10 per cent or more on fears that the deposit flight is accelerating. Greek government bonds plunged, pushing up the yield on three-year bonds by about 2.3 percentage points, to 20.4 per cent, the highest since March, 2012, the last time Grexit was a clear and present danger.
In Istanbul, where the Group of 20 finance ministers were meeting, Canadian Finance Minister Joe Oliver urged both sides to give ground.
“It’s clear that Greece has got to be prepared to make some changes, and I think a wholesale repudiation of their debt is not in the cards,” he told Reuters. “But other countries, creditors, will have to work with Greece to arrive at a compromise solution.”
At the same time, the Grexit odds are rising across the board. Over the weekend, former U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan told the BBC that a Greek exit is inevitable, though he didn’t say when, and the British government admitted it was making contingency plans.
On Monday, Gary Jenkins, chief credit strategist at LNG Capital, put the odds at 50 per cent. Nicholas Spiro of London’s Spiro Sovereign Strategy is now giving Greece only a 30-per-cent chance of leaving, but that’s up from essentially zero before the election.
“It’s clear that Syriza fears the political consequences of backing down and is determined to push the envelope,” Mr. Spiro said.
As the biggest European economy and the main sponsor of Greece’s €240-billion ($339-billion) bailout program, Germany has the power to make or break Greece’s euro zone membership. But Germany seems to be in losing position.

Blame Spain.
Spain is grappling with austerity even though the country is not under an international bailout program (It did, however, request the European bailout of its banks in 2012, blurring the lines between a sovereign and a bank bailout).
Spain has come out of recession but its economy remains in tatters. The unemployment rate, at 23.7 per cent, is the second highest in the developed world, after Greece. Youth unemployment, at more than 50 per cent, matches Greece.
No surprise that the Spanish anti-austerity party, Podemos, has become a phenomenon. The party did not exist a year ago; it’s now winning the political beauty contest. A new poll released Monday gave Podemos 27.7 per cent, a commanding lead over the conservative Partido Popular party of Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy.
Spain faces a general election in the autumn and if the polls hold up, Mr. Rajoy and his pro-austerity colleagues are goners.
The political and economic calculus of Ms. Merkel and her Finance Minister, Wolfgang Schaeuble, must be painful. Germany must know that if it gives Greece what it wants – the end to austerity and a debt-lite agreement – Podemos would win the Spanish election and demand similar anti-austerity relief.
Ditto the ample anti-austerity movements in Portugal and Italy. In effect, giving in to Syriza could kill austerity, the combination of tax hikes and spending cuts that are the cornerstone of Germany’s fix-Europe strategy, in all of southern Europe.
On the other hand, allowing Greece to self-destruct would get rid of a country that should never have been in the euro zone in the first place because of its weak fiscal situation and discourage Podemos from Syriza copycat tactics.
Plus, it would please the German electorate, which is losing it patience with Greece and knows full well it will never be able to repay its enormous debt. Spain is the euro zone’s fourth-biggest economy. Germany may decide that sacrificing Greece is the price to pay to keep Spain in the family fold. The trouble with letting Greece go is the unknown, and potentially dire, economic consequence.
Of course, a classic euro zone fudge is possible, where Greece gets a little of what it wants and Syriza dresses up the meagre gruel as a victory. But based on Syrizia’s hard-line stance and encouragement from voters who are sick of austerity, this is one time a fudge may not work.

Scientists raise alarm over plastic waste in oceans







Scientists raise alarm over plastic waste in oceans



An estimated eight million metric tonnes of plastic waste ended up in the world’s oceans from the garbage of those who live along the coasts in 2010, a new study says, a figure that amounts to five full grocery bags for every foot of coastline.
The team of researchers estimates 9.1 million metric tonnes of plastic will end up in oceans this year.

MORE RELATED TO THIS STORY








“And it can get worse,” Jenna Jambeck, the lead author of the study, said at a news conference at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in San Jose, Calif. “If we assume a business-as-usual projection with growing population, increasing plastic consumption, and increased waste generation, by 2025, this number doubles. We may be adding 17.5 million metric tonnes of plastic per year.”
While marine pollution is a well-known problem, the study by the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis to be published on Friday in the journal Science is the first time researchers have estimated the amount of plastic waste that flowed into the ocean in a given year.
The study looked at the amount of waste generated within 50 kilometres of the ocean in each of 192 countries with coastline in 2010. Based on those findings, the researchers calculated how much of that garbage was properly managed and how much was not.
They factored in how much was plastic and how much of that plastic was likely to make its way to the sea. Their statistical analysis included population density, the sophistication of waste management systems, and overall plastic use in each country.
“We’re being overwhelmed by our waste,” Dr. Jambeck said in a statement.
Only a fraction of that plastic is on the surface, she said. Much of it is on the ocean floor.
The median estimate of eight million metric tonnes – from a range of between 4.8 million and 12.7 million – did not take into account natural disasters like the 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan that washed about five million metric tonnes of debris into the ocean, said Kara Lavender Law, a team member from the Sea Education Association in Massachusetts.
Nor did it include plastic pollution from ships, fishing or aquaculture, she said.



“Having sailed in the Atlantic and Pacific … and observing the problem first-hand, I knew that number had to be big, but the magnitude is hard to fathom,” she said.
China was, by far, the largest polluter, contributing between 1.32 and 3.53 million metric tonnes of plastic marine debris in 2010. For comparison, No. 2 Indonesia added 0.48 to 1.29 million metric tonnes.
Only one high-income country is on the list of top polluters: The United States is No. 20, responsible for an estimated 0.04 to 0.11 million metric tonnes because of its population density along the coasts and high volume of plastic waste.
Canada, with the longest coastline in the world, fared much better.
This country produced almost 8,000 tonnes of mismanaged plastic waste in 2010, compared with more than 275,000 tonnes in the United States and 8.8 million in China. Under the study model, only a percentage would make its way to the ocean.
A 2012 study by the University of British Columbia found plastic pervasive in the stomachs of beached marine birds along the B.C., Washington state and Oregon coasts.
Necropsies on 67 Northern fulmars found 92.5 per cent had plastics such as twine, Styrofoam and candy wrappers in their stomachs. One bird had ingested 454 pieces.
Max Liboiron, an ocean activist and academic who is launching an ocean plastic monitoring program in St. John’s, said previous studies have suggested two-thirds of all marine animals are affected.
The chemicals in plastic are like “poison pills” that bio-magnify as they make their way up the food chain, all the way to humans, she said.



Watch Elizabeth Warren Put a Banker in His Place — And Another Banker Applaud Her for It




Watch Elizabeth Warren Put a Banker in His Place — And Another Banker Applaud Her for It


It’s nothing new to watch Sen. Elizabeth Warren hand a banker his ass during a committee hearing, as she does here:
What’s unusual about this particular hearing occurs about 15 seconds before the end, when someone off camera applauds. Why unusual? Because according to The Huffington Post, the person clapping is another banker, John H. Buhrmaster, the chairman of the Independent Community Bankers of America.
He was applauding because Warren was grilling R. Dan Blanton, testifying on behalf of the American Bankers Association, over regulations the ABA has proposed that they claim would benefit community banks. The regulations — actually “deregulations,” since they would overturn part of the Dodd-Frank rules — wouldn’t actually apply to many mortgages held by community banks, since they are already exempt under the current rules (as well as proposed new ones from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that would exempt even some larger community banks).
Elizabeth Warren Banking CommitteeWarren pointed out that the vast majority of the benefits would go to big banks like Wells Fargo and Citibank, and that community banks have in fact become more profitable since the Dodd-Frank rules went into effect.
Big business associations like the ABA do this all the time. They always claim they’re speaking for small businesses, Mom and Pop shops lining the Main Streets of small-town America. But these organizations are funded by the big corporations, and that’s who they truly represent. So when Warren spoke up for the community banks, it’s no surprise that the person in the audience who actually works for community banks applauded her.
Jesse Berney is senior editor of BNR and stand-up comedian in Washington, DC. Follow him on Twitter: @jesseberney

Thursday, February 12, 2015

Swiss government proposes draft law to curb immigration from EU

Swiss government proposes draft law to curb immigration from EU

PUBLISHED ON FEB 11, 2015 11:00 PM
Cars near a checkpoint at the Swiss-German border in the northern Swiss town of Kreuzlingen Jan 17, 2015. The Swiss government on Tuesday proposed a draft law to limit immigration following a controversial popular vote, but said it is seeking talks with the European Union in order not to violate bilateral treaties including free movement of people. -- PHOTO: REUTERS

ZURICH (REUTERS) - The Swiss government on Wednesday proposed a draft law to limit immigration following a referendum but said it was seeking talks with the European Union in order not to violate bilateral treaties including on the free movement of people.
A year ago, the Swiss voted to impose quotas on immigration, which could mean tearing up treaties between the EU and Switzerland including on the free movement of labour.
The referendum, initiated by the right-wing Swiss People’s Party (SVP), was strongly opposed by the government as well as Swiss banks, drugmakers and other industries that rely heavily on skilled workers from the EU.
The vote in favour handed the government the problem of how to manage immigration through quotas without angering Brussels, which has said any curb on the influx of EU workers would violate treaties that cover a range of issues including economic and technological cooperation, agricultural trade, aviation and road and rail traffic.
The government plans to set annual limits for the number of people allowed to move to Switzerland, President Simonetta Sommaruga said, without giving details.
Employers will be required to favour Swiss nationals when hiring new staff, according to the draft, although there should be exceptions in certain jobs that have proved difficult to fill.



China allows companies more freedom in free trade zone

China allows companies more freedom in free trade zone


[SHANGHAI] China has opened the door of its tightly-controlled capital account a fraction wider by allowing firms operating within its Shanghai free trade zone to borrow funds without having to go through complicated regulatory hurdles.
Firms - both non-financial and financial - in the free trade zone in Shanghai will now be able to borrow up to twice their capital base, double the previous limit allowing them greater access to cheaper offshore financing.
Firms in the free trade zone will be allowed to determine their own level of foreign capital financing exposure, according to the central bank's statement released on Thursday.
Banks operating in the zone can raise funds either in foreign or domestic currency. Non-bank financial institutions such as securities firms can also import foreign capital but domestic firms are urged not to rely on short-term financing, authorities said. "It is a positive step in terms of liberalization of the capital account for the corporate sector," said Eddie Cheung, a foreign exchange strategist at Standard Chartered Bank in Hong Kong.




Strategists say the latest steps indicate Beijing is looking to accelerate its reform agenda by allowing foreign companies greater flexiblility in operating on the mainland and perhaps counter some of the large capital outflows it saw last year.
By allowing greater access to companies to overseas markets, China is hoping to reverse some of the flows and boost the attractiveness of the free trade zone, where the incremental pace of opening has been greeted with lukewarm enthusiasm among foreign companies in recent months. "This specific decree means that the capital account for firms in the free trade zone has effectively been opened, another step towards actively deepening capital account opening in China," said Shanghai PBOC deputy director Zhang Xin on Thursday.
China launched the Shanghai free trade zone in September 2013 and officials promised a far more open and streamlined environment for foreign firms to do business there, along with the relaxation of policies for a raft of service sectors.
In recent months, it has speeded up the reform initiative by expanding the footprint of the free trade zone and allowing full foreign ownership of e-commerce firms in Shanghai.
REUTERS







728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600