Tuesday, January 13, 2015

RBS Says Sayonara to World's Weirdest Bond Market

<p>He's buying all the bonds.</p>
 Photographer: Kiyoshi Ota/Bloomberg
HE'S BUYING ALL THE BONDS.
 PHOTOGRAPHER: KIYOSHI OTA/BLOOMBERG


Japan has long been the world's living laboratory for observing what happens when a large chunk of the population grows old. Now, it's also a financial testing ground -- demonstrating how a huge, developed economy will live without a bond market.
The nation has loads of bonds -- 1 quadrillion yen ($8.67 trillion) worth -- but no real market for them. That's because the Bank of Japan, in its aggressive campaign to end deflation, is nationalizing the debt arena.  In response, Royal Bank of Scotland is saying sayonara to Japan's debt business, giving up its position as a primary dealer.
Haruhiko Kuroda, governor of Japan's central bank, has been buying up roughly $100 billion in debt per month, immobilizing trading opportunities and giving new meaning to the old concept of "crowding out." That's when government dominates an area of the private sector to the point where the laws of supply and demand stop working. That's where Japan finds itself as the BOJ bigfoots individual buyers and narrows the investor base. With more than 90 percent of IOUs held domestically, Japan is already the Galapagos of debt realms. As yields disappear, it's looking like the financial equivalent of "The Matrix," where market reality is a simulated one.
It's impossible, after all, to rationalize a nation's 10-year bonds with a public debt two-and-half times bigger than the economy. Soon, quips Richard Duncan of Blackhorse Asset Management, people will be paying Japan's government for the right to hold its debt. "The very low JGB yields," he says, "certainly do indicate that something is very wrong."
It also indicates why central bankers in the U.S. and Europe need to tread carefully with their own quantitative-easing schemes. Japan is also the word's lab for the post-QE experience. How it copes without a conventional debt market will offer timely lessons for policy makers from Washington to Frankfurt.
Among the unknowns is how corporate borrowers price debt. Deciding on a security's coupon, maturity and structure is a challenge in the best of times. But when yields on 2- and 5-year Japanese debt are going negative -- and 10-year bonds are heading that way, too -- corporate treasurers might as well rely on a coin toss. That could lead to mispricing on an epic scale. Kuroda has been driving down sovereign yields to encourage investment in riskier corporate notes and stocks. But when it comes to measuring risk, says Marshall Mays, director of Emerging Alpha Advisors, Kuroda's massive easing efforts have obliterated the lines between perception and reality.
Another problem is the replacement of old bubbles with new ones. As I've written before, Kuroda is adding fresh fuel for the world's most obvious bond bubble. Even if the BOJ were to achieve its 2 percent inflation goal, it would struggle to keep yields from skyrocketing. Kuroda would need to buy up ever larger blocks of debt, further warping the financial system and forcing the BOJ to feed an expanding pyramid scheme.
How to mitigate the damage? Avoid encroaching so much on the bond market. While it's possible that Janet Yellen's Federal Reserve can avoid this fate, Mario Draghi's European Central Bank might not, as deflation grips the continent. Deadening the mechanics of European and U.S. bond markets, Japan-style, would raise the odds of another global crisis. What’s more, without the risk-measuring function that yields provide, investors won't see it coming.
Central banks also should turn up the heat on government policy makers -- something the BOJ has avoided. Becoming a crutch for risk-adverse politicians has its dangers -- including, in Japan, renewed recession and disappearing yields. Huge injections of liquidity should come with quid pro quos: We do X on monetary side, you do Y on the fiscal side. 
For Japan, the end, as Duncan points out, may justify the means. "I believe the BOJ will eventually write off all the government debt it's acquiring through QE," he says. "I think that will be a good thing as it will greatly reduce the level of Japan's government debt."
But a functioning and trusted debt market is the backbone of any healthy economy. Japan no longer has one.
To contact the author on this story:
William Pesek at wpesek@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor on this story:
Mary Duenwald at mduenwald@bloomberg.net

Tentative but no fundamental change in Singapore

Tentative but no fundamental change in Singapore

Authors: Mukul G. Asher, NUS, and Chang Yee Kwan, Independent
On the usual measures of economic prosperity, Singapore went from strength to macroeconomic strength in 2014. Real economic growth was between 2.5 and 3.5 per cent for the year. The world economy was forecast by the IMF in October to have grown at 3.3 per cent. Singapore continued to grow in importance as anASEAN hub for RMB-denominated financial services, and was named, for the ninth year running, the best global location for business and enterprise.
Singapore's skyline gliters with lights as spheres in the waters of Marina Bay form the number '50' to mark Singapore’s 50th anniversary in 2015, ahead of the New Year's countdown celebrations in Singapore on December 31, 2014. (Photo: AAP)
Inflation ran at between 1 to 1.5 per cent, with real income growing purportedly at0.4 per cent. Unemployment stayed low at 2 per cent. Income inequality amongst those with a job was slightly lower — with a Gini coefficient at 0.463 before government taxes and transfers, and 0.412 after — than the year before.
But these healthy numbers need to be interpreted with caution.
For example, inflation has been low because healthcare costs have been kept low, thanks to a 2014 government subsidy for the elderly, and cannot be attributed to improvements in productivity and economic performance. Income inequality is also likely to be understated, since retirees, who form over 6 per cent of households, and capital income, which accrues largely to higher income groups, are excluded from the calculations. As wages consistently comprise less than half of household income, measured inequality would be much higher if both retiree households and capital income are included.
There are also some warning signs on the horizon. A mid-2014 study reported that Singapore’s household debt-to-GDP ratio had risen sharply from 48 per cent in 2007 to between 78 per cent and 130 per cent in 2013, depending on the sources used. A rapidly rising debt ratio not only accentuates inequality but also makes households and the economy more vulnerable to negative macroeconomic and asset price shocks. If current low oil prices persist, Singapore could suffer in 2015 as oil companies reduce capital expenditure globally, affecting oil equipment manufacturing in Singapore. Growth uncertainty from lower oil and commodity prices in Indonesia, Malaysia, and China may also impact Singapore negatively.
Singapore’s economic prosperity means that policymakers face different problems from the past. A focus on rapid increases in absolute income and the provision of basic goods are giving way to concerns about relative income, the adequacy and accessibility of healthcare as well as retirement provision and public sector transparency and accountability. The elements of Singapore’s social safety net remain inadequate, but policymakers appear content with marginal changes.
For example, changes have been announced to MediShield, the state-administered health insurance scheme, which promises universal coverage and wider benefits. But premiums remain priced on commercial guidelines which vary with gender andincrease with age. Lower-income groups and the elderly still face inadequate coverage because of short-term income fluctuations as a result of to macroeconomic conditions and illness. The principles of social risk pooling remain unimplemented.
Similarly half-hearted reforms are proposed in the area of retirement financing. It is increasingly clear that relying on the social security scheme, the Central Provident Fund (CPF) will, for many, be insufficient for retirement. To address this concern, the government has announced an income supplement scheme to be unveiled in the 2015 budget. But preliminary indications suggest its impact is likely to be marginal.
Singaporeans are increasingly expecting greater social equality and public accountability. Policymakers will need to re-examine their guiding philosophies on service provision by the state, aligning them better with popular demands for better quality-of-life. This includes acknowledging that relative, not absolute, povertymatters in a rapidly ageing and affluent Singapore and introducing a means-tested budget-financed social pension for the elderly and disabled. There is sufficient fiscal space for such an initiative.
The MediShield insurance scheme should also be re-orientated along the lines of social rather than commercial principles. The goal of social protection policies is not to minimise government budgetary spending but rather the total amount of economic resources for a fair and adequate level of social protection.
A move towards greater accountability can be signalled by accepting demands tocollect and release better quality data, which encourages higher quality widely-based public policy debates. This also includes a detailed disclosure of data for CPF balances and returns, as these impact the adequacy (and public perception) of retirement financing andthe government’s accountability. A similar case can be made for scrutiny of the methodology and assumptions used to calculate the ‘after tax’ Gini coefficient, since analysts face significant conceptual and statistical limitations in estimating household economic tax burdens.
Singapore’s economy continues to impress, even with some potential storm clouds on the horizon. The government’s response to calls for greater equity and accountability will determine the extent of trust and credibility it has with the populace. Current measures remain inadequate.
Mukul G. Asher is Professorial Fellow at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore, and Councillor at the Takshashila Institution in Bangalore.
Chang Yee Kwan is an independent researcher.
This article is part of an EAF special feature series on 2014 in review and the year ahead.

Gold bulls – beware of Greeks bearing gifts! - BY THE DAILY COIN · JANUARY 13, 2015

TDC note – I’m going with Andy Hoffman on this one, but Mr. Williams, makes a valid point.
by Lawrence Williams, MineWeb
The prospect of a Syriza victory in the Greek elections next week has been gold price supportive, but beware – it’s not a foregone conclusion.
gold bull
Some of the recent positive action in the gold price has been due to fear of a Syriza win in the Greek election next week and a possible new government’s potential for cutting imposed austerity measures, defaulting on its financial commitments and, ultimately, for the country being forced out of the Eurozone. It would be the first Eurozone domino to fall and there are worries that if Greece goes, others may follow.
The attractions of the monetary flexibility of utilising one’s own currency rather than being forced to work with a currency, the Euro, the value of which is largely controlled by nations with much bigger, and more stable, economies, is strong regardless of the actual costs incurred in making the change – which would be enormous.
For a country like Greece with its enormous tourist industry, a weaker currency – probably far weaker if it should exit the Euro – could give this very significant sector an enormous boost, albeit hugely increasing the cost of imports at the same time.
Investors seem to be assuming that Alexis Tsipras’ Syriza party will win the election, but it is only perhaps 3-5% ahead of Antonis Samaras’ New Democracy party – the party of the ruling government, although the latter has only been able to rule in coalition with the much smaller Pasok party. That suggests that the election result is perhaps too close to call and even if the pollsters findings are borne out, Syriza would still probably have to find its own coalition partner to gain a majority in the Greek parliament, and the attitude of the coalition partner to Syriza’s proposed anti-austerity programme could be key.
Syriza leader Tsipras has also been rather more circumspect in his proposals through the campaign. Once considered totally anti-Eurozone, his more recent statements do not appear to contemplate leaving it – perhaps as a sop to the electorate which appears to be largely in favour of remaining in the European Community, although one doubts the majority are aware of the potential financial ramifications of either remaining in or out. Meanwhile the New Democracy campaign is playing on people’s fears of ‘Grexit’ – the prospect of Greece leaving the EC should Syriza win the election.
From the gold point of view though, a Syriza victory would lead to continuing uncertainty as to exactly what path Greece would take. Would it default on its commitments or not? The probability is that it would providing it can find sufficient support in parliament for the policy, but then would Germany, and the other Eurozone leaders, force Greece out of the single currency system, as it has said it would, or would some kind of compromise prevail? Continuing uncertainty over a possible Grexit would probably remain positive for gold.
On the other hand, should New Democracy win the election, which is certainly still possible, that could well knock the gold price back as it would take the Greek exit and its possible ramifications off the agenda for the time being. So it may be best not to count on a Syriza victory yet.
However there are other things also helping drive the gold price upwards. It appears to be following its recent pattern – the price going up in Asia overnight – it hit $1,245 last night, before being brought back down a few dollars at London opening.
But there are plenty of other geopolitical uncertainties sitting out there at the moment and the fact that the gold price has been moving upwards during Asian dominated hours suggests that Chinese demand in particular is less sensitive to price than many would have us believe. 2015 looks like turning into a year of uncertainties on the geopolitical front which will be gold positive and if demand from China stays up and that from India picks up again during the current year, the supply/demand equation will also be gold positive. But so much will continue to depend on the machinations in the futures markets as to what path gold will take throughout the year and market reaction to the likely start of U.S. interest rate increases later in the year.
But overall, it’s probably best not to count on a Syriza overall success in the Greek elections. If it is defeated the gold price could take a nasty knock. If it wins, without an overall majority, it may be forced to mitigate its stance on ending austerity and a Greek default – and even if it wins outright, political expediency may also force it to rein in its projected policies. Tsipras has already been modifying his stance through the election campaign.
19 total views, 19 views today
Don't forget to follow The Daily Coin on Twitter and like us on Facebook .





Only YOU can spread brushfires of Freedom

Deflation and Central Bank Delusions

Deflation and Central Bank Delusions

Gary Christenson
 |
Tuesday, January 13th
Contradictions exist in our less than sane financial world.
Is it sensible to pay insolvent banks to hold your currency? Negative interest rates are now common.
Is it sensible to lend your savings to insolvent governments for 10 years at 2% interest or less when history shows us that the purchasing power of the currency will decrease far more than 2% per year?
Is it sensible that the time value of currency is effectively zero?  Zero or negative interest rates are not a sign of economic health.
Graham Summers has written about the $100 Trillion Trigger That Terrifies Central Banks.   From his article:
“The world is turning Japanese. 
“For over 20 years, Japan has been ground zero for the great Keynesian nightmare of central planning. Japan’s financial bubbles burst in 1989 – 1990. Since that time, Japan has seen little to no growth for 30 years. 
“In the simplest of renderings, Japan has proven point-blank that you cannot fight an epic debt bubble by making debt cheaper…However, this has not stopped Central Banks from around the world from implementingthe exact same failed policies to fight their own bouts of deflation. 
“When stocks crash, investors go broke.  When bonds CRASH, entire countries go bust…  When this bubble bursts, 2008 will look like a picnic.” 
“At any time the Western house of cards could collapse.”
“The good times are over… there will be minus signs in front of returns for many asset classes.”
Andy Hoffman points out that the Baltic Dry Index fell to its lowest ever level in early January. He also notes that Japanese corporate bankruptcies exploded to an all-time high and that the number of Japanese households receiving welfare hit an all-time high for the sixth straight month.   He goes on to say:
 “…when deflation truly kicks in, everything will decline in value – except money itself, i.e. physical gold and silver. The fact that nominal values will eventually explode when hyper-inflation arrives is immaterial, as real values will continue to plummet irrespective – just as they did in Weimar Germany and 1990s Zimbabwe, to name a few examples. Yes, everything that can’t maintain its purchasing power will plunge; and what ‘asset’ will lose more purchasing power than U.S. Treasury bonds?
 “After all, who on earth would voluntarily lend money to the most heavily indebted, insolvent entity in history?”
“Under the gold standard, gold was money. So you had to pay for things with gold… But during World War I, European governments went off the gold standard… printed a lot of paper money… and used it to finance the government debt.
 “Today the global economy is like a big rubber raft.  Instead of being inflated with air, it’s inflated with credit.  On top of the raft you have all asset classes – stocks, bonds and commodities, including gold – and 7 billion people. 
“The problem is the raft has now become fundamentally defective.  So much credit has been created that the income of the 7 billion people is insufficient to service the interest on the debt… and they keep defaulting. 
“The natural tendency of the raft is to sink.  And when it sinks – as it did in 2008… and when QE1 and QE2 ended – all asset classes go down together. 
“There’s only one possible policy response – and that’s to pump in more credit. 
“That’s what the QE is about.  Central banks pump in more credit.”
“There is compelling evidence that 2015 will see a global slump in economic activity.  This being the case, financial and systemic risks will increase as evidence of the slump accumulates.  It can be expected to undermine global equities, property and finally bond markets, which are currently all priced for economic stability. Even though these markets are increasingly controlled by central bank intervention, it is dangerous to assume this will continue to be the case as financial and systemic risks accumulate. 
“Precious metals are ultimately free from price management by the state. Furthermore, they are the only asset class notably underpriced today, given the enormous increase in the quantity of fiat money since the Lehman crisis. 
“In short, 2015 is shaping up to be very bad for fiat currencies and very good for gold and silver.”
 MY CONCLUSIONS:
  • Watch Japan for further indications of a bond and currency implosion resulting from Abenomics and Keynesian money printing nonsense.
  • The good times are over. A major crash or collapse could occur at any time, this year or even as late as the end of 2016.
  • Deflation in many sectors has arrived. Excessive global debt can no longer be serviced, employment is weak, far too much collateral is impaired, commodity prices are declining, and too much wealth is being sucked out of our economies by the financial industry, the military-industrial complex, big pharmacy, big government and entitlements.
  • Central banks will fight the economic downturn, outright deflation, and a bond market implosion with the same failed policies. Volatility will increase, and QE, regardless of what they call it, in Japan, Europe, and the U.S. will accelerate.  That extra bond monetization and “money printing” may not help as much as central banks and insolvent government hope, as it will eventually dawn on savers and investors that QE to infinity is required merely to keep western economic systems afloat.  Then real money – gold and silver – will be bid much higher.
  • Under any scenario, gold and silver will remain the ONLY real money. They will maintain lasting value in a world of imploding stocks, bonds, and unbacked fiat currencies.
  • I expect that central banks will not voluntarily self-destruct by allowing a deflationary depression, that politicians will demand more QE to keep the system afloat, and that central banks will decide that rapidly rising gold and silver prices are a small price to pay in exchange for the continuance of the system that keeps the political and financial elite both wealthy and powerful.
Gary Christenson

New clout for Warren mind-set: Treasury nominee with Wall Street ties bows out




New clout for Warren mind-set: Treasury nominee with Wall Street ties bows out

New York banker Antonio Weiss withdrew from consideration for a top Treasury job, offering a symbolic victory for Sen. Elizabeth Warren and others seeking to limit Wall Street's influence in Washington.

By , Staff writer 

  • View Caption
A New York banker has withdrawn from being considered for a top US Treasury position, after coming under pressure in an era of heightened concern about the political influence of Wall Street.
As Antonio Weiss bows out of consideration, it’s a symbolic victory for Sen.Elizabeth Warren (D) of Massachusetts and others seeking to limit banker clout. She vocally opposed his nomination by President Obama to be the Treasury’s undersecretary for domestic finance.
The pull-out by Weiss may signal that a climate of closer scrutiny of Wall Street will linger as a legacy of the 2008 financial crisis – all with an eye toward safeguarding the US economy from the risk of other bubble-and-bust cycles in the future.
Recommended: Could you be a Federal Reserve banker?
Senator Warren is not the only senator or policymaker who holds such concerns.



“I have no personal animosity toward Mr. Weiss but I am very glad he withdrew his nomination,” Sen. Bernie Sanders, (I) of Vermont said in a statement Tuesday. “The president needs economic advisors who do not come from Wall Street. In fact, he needs advisors prepared to stand up to Wall Street. We need economic policies in this country which ask the wealthy and large corporations to pay their fair share of taxes and which create millions of good-paying jobs.” 
Don’t think the “revolving door” between Wall Street and Washington policy jobs has suddenly been sealed off, though.
Although Warren has a high profile as a possible presidential candidate,Republicans are now dominant in the Senate – and many of them lend a closer ear to Wall Street interests than Democrats do. Current Treasury Secretary Jack Lew worked for a big bank, just like several of his recent predecessors. And Mr. Weiss himself will still end up helping to guide policy, serving Secretary Lew in an advisory job that doesn’t require Senate confirmation.
What’s clear, in fact, is simply that the battle over Wall Street’s role in Washington will go on. Banks still wield major influence, but now that influence also can potentially be checked by populist senators, some independent-minded regulators, and a more skeptical public.
A next stage in the battle could come as banks try to get the Republican-controlled Congress to lighten financial regulations imposed after the 2008 crisis. (Already banks have sought and won a rollback in oversight of the investments known as “derivatives.”)
Some economists say over-regulating banks can create risks of slower economic growth, but others say the real danger lies in allowing banks to take too many risks.
“One top priority now should be attempting to strengthen the safeguards in the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation. Repealing or rolling back that legislation poses a major fiscal risk,” economist Simon Johnson of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology told a House hearing on the economy Tuesday. “The fact that this is not currently scored by the Congressional Budget Office does not reduce this risk or make it any smaller.”
He said the 2008 crisis showed the risks of financial firms taking great risks without sufficient buffers of capital on their books. “Systemic risks materialized suddenly and with devastating impact,” Mr. Johnson said. 
Passion for such concerns is strongest on the left, but some Republicans share the worry.
One sign: When AFL-CIO leader Richard Trumka recently sent letters to big banks asking them to explain why they give financial bonuses when executives exit to take influential policy positions in Washington, he got some support from conservative press.
The editorial page of The Wall Street Journal said the Trumka letters raise important questions.
For all the power banks still have, through campaign donations and lobbying, they’ve also taken a hit in public opinion.
Gallup polling on confidence in various institutions find only about 26 percent of Americans have strong faith in banks. That’s better than opinions of Congress, but it’s far below the above-50 levels that were common for the banking industry in Gallup polls before 2007.




728 X 90

336 x 280

300 X 250

320 X 100

300 X600